On Sunday, January 8, 2017 at 7:53:37 PM UTC-8, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Suppose you have an expensive calculation that gets used two or more times in
> a
> loop. The obvious way to avoid calculating it twice in an ordinary loop is
> with
> a temporary variable:
>
> result = []
> for x in data
On Friday, January 6, 2017 at 6:04:33 AM UTC-8, Peter Otten wrote:
> Example: you are looking for the minimum absolute value in a series of
> integers. As soon as you encounter the first 0 it's unnecessary extra work
> to check the remaining values, but the builtin min() will continue.
>
> The s
On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 1:10:04 PM UTC-8, Dietmar Schwertberger wrote:
> On 04.01.2017 07:54, Antonio Caminero Garcia wrote:
> > Unfortunately most of the time I am still using print and input functions.
I know that sucks, I did not use the pdb module, I guess that IDE debuggers
On Thursday, January 5, 2017 at 12:32:19 PM UTC-8, fpp wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Chris Clark
> > wrote:
> >> I want an IDE that I can use at work and home, linux and dare I say
> >> windows.
> >> Sublime, had to remove it from my work PC as it is not licensed.
> >> Atom, loved it
On Thursday, January 5, 2017 at 9:51:17 AM UTC-8, ArnoB wrote:
> On 02-01-17 12:38, Antonio Caminero Garcia wrote:
> > Hello, I am having a hard time deciding what IDE or IDE-like code editor
should I use. This can be overwhelming.
> >
> > So far, I have used Vim, Sublime, Ato
On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 1:10:04 PM UTC-8, Dietmar Schwertberger wrote:
> On 04.01.2017 07:54, Antonio Caminero Garcia wrote:
> > Unfortunately most of the time I am still using print and input functions.
> > I know that sucks, I did not use the pdb module, I guess tha
On Thursday, January 5, 2017 at 9:51:17 AM UTC-8, ArnoB wrote:
> On 02-01-17 12:38, Antonio Caminero Garcia wrote:
> > Hello, I am having a hard time deciding what IDE or IDE-like code editor
> > should I use. This can be overwhelming.
> >
> > So far, I have used Vim,
On Thursday, January 5, 2017 at 12:32:19 PM UTC-8, fpp wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Chris Clark
> > wrote:
> >> I want an IDE that I can use at work and home, linux and dare I say
> >> windows.
> >> Sublime, had to remove it from my work PC as it is not licensed.
> >> Atom, loved i
On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 4:12:34 PM UTC-8, Dietmar Schwertberger wrote:
> On 02.01.2017 12:38, Antonio Caminero Garcia wrote:
> You did not try Wing IDE? It looks less like a spacecraft. Maybe you
> like it.
> Maybe the difference is that Wing is from Python people while th
On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 4:12:34 PM UTC-8, Dietmar Schwertberger wrote:
> On 02.01.2017 12:38, Antonio Caminero Garcia wrote:
> You did not try Wing IDE? It looks less like a spacecraft. Maybe you
> like it.
> Maybe the difference is that Wing is from Python people while the
Guys really thank you for your answers. Basically now I am more emphasizing in
learning in depth a tool and get stick to it so I can get a fast workflow.
Eventually I will learn Vim and its python developing setup, I know people who
have been programming using Vim for almost 20 years and they di
On Monday, January 2, 2017 at 5:57:51 PM UTC-8, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 10:38 pm, Antonio Caminero Garcia wrote:
>
> > Hello, I am having a hard time deciding what IDE or IDE-like code editor
> > should I use. This can be overwhelming.
>
>
On Monday, January 2, 2017 at 8:24:29 AM UTC-8, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 01/02/2017 04:38 AM, Antonio Caminero Garcia wrote:
> > The problem with Vim is the learning curve, so I know the very basic
> > stuff, but obviously not enough for coding and I do not have time to
> &
Hello, I am having a hard time deciding what IDE or IDE-like code editor should
I use. This can be overwhelming.
So far, I have used Vim, Sublime, Atom, Eclipse with PyDev, Pycharm, IntelliJ
with Python plugin.
The thing with the from-the-scratch full featured IDEs (Eclipse, IntelliJ,
Pycharm
On Monday, March 28, 2016 at 11:26:08 PM UTC+2, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 4:30 AM, Rob Gaddi
> wrote:
> > beliav...@aol.com wrote:
> >
> >> On Saturday, March 26, 2016 at 7:24:10 PM UTC-4, Erik wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Or, if you want to "import operator" first, you can use 'operat
On Sunday, March 27, 2016 at 11:52:22 AM UTC+2, larudwer wrote:
> how about
>
> sorted(["a", "b"]*3)
> ['a', 'a', 'a', 'b', 'b', 'b']
that's cooler, less efficient though and do not maintain the original order. In
case such order was important, you should proceed as follows:
If the elemen
On Sunday, March 27, 2016 at 10:02:44 AM UTC+2, Antonio Caminero Garcia wrote:
> On Saturday, March 26, 2016 at 11:12:58 PM UTC+1, beli...@aol.com wrote:
> > I can create a list that has repeated elements of another list as follows:
> >
> > xx = ["a","
On Saturday, March 26, 2016 at 11:12:58 PM UTC+1, beli...@aol.com wrote:
> I can create a list that has repeated elements of another list as follows:
>
> xx = ["a","b"]
> nrep = 3
> print xx
> yy = []
> for aa in xx:
> for i in range(nrep):
> yy.append(aa)
> print yy
>
> output:
> ['a
18 matches
Mail list logo
