On 1 Feb 2023 17:31:02 GMT, Stefan Ram wrote:
> rbowman writes:
>> Why does every language have to invent their own function to
>>print to the console that is very similar but not the same as the rest
>>of the herd?
>
> Why do there have to be different languages at all?
https://homepages.cwi
On 2/1/23 12:46 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
C (the language) doesn't support Unicode at all. There are, however,
libraries that can be used to deal with it.
No, it does, but only optionally.
provides functions that manipulate Unicode "Characters"
The type char32_t will hold Unicode Code Points,
On 2/1/23 3:59 AM, mutt...@dastardlyhq.com wrote:
On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 11:59:25 +1300
Greg Ewing wrote:
On 31/01/23 10:24 pm, mutt...@dastardlyhq.com wrote:
All languages have their ugly corners due to initial design mistakes and/or
constraints. Eg: java with the special behaviour of its string
On 2/1/2023 1:37 PM, Jack Dangler wrote:
If you're not familiar with snap, lookup 'snap' 'ubuntu' ...
Many people would rather avoid snap if possible ...
On 2/1/23 13:13, Thomas Passin wrote:
On 2/1/2023 12:36 PM, אורי wrote:
Thank you all.
I'm not familiar with snap update but I did `sudo
On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 at 04:26, wrote:
>
> Its not evolution, its revolution. Evolution retains old functionality.
>
By the way, I'd like to see your opinions on eternal retention of old
functionality. Which of these features are you willing to put effort
into supporting?
1) Long integer constants
If you're not familiar with snap, lookup 'snap' 'ubuntu' ...
On 2/1/23 13:13, Thomas Passin wrote:
On 2/1/2023 12:36 PM, אורי wrote:
Thank you all.
I'm not familiar with snap update but I did `sudo apt update` & `sudo
apt
upgrade`, but about one or two months ago.
אורי
u...@speedy.net
You
On 2/1/2023 12:36 PM, אורי wrote:
Thank you all.
I'm not familiar with snap update but I did `sudo apt update` & `sudo apt
upgrade`, but about one or two months ago.
אורי
u...@speedy.net
You can probably install it from the deadsnakes repository:
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:deadsnakes/ppa
M
On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 at 04:29, wrote:
>
> On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 11:59:25 +1300
> Greg Ewing wrote:
> >On 31/01/23 10:24 pm, mutt...@dastardlyhq.com wrote:
> >> All languages have their ugly corners due to initial design mistakes and/or
> >> constraints. Eg: java with the special behaviour of its strin
On 2023-02-01, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> On 2023-02-01 09:00:39 -, mutt...@dastardlyhq.com wrote:
>> Its not evolution, its revolution. Evolution retains old functionality.
>
> Tell a penguin that it can fly :-)
Penguins can fly. They just do it underwater...
--
https://mail.python.org/mail
On 2023-02-01, mutt...@dastardlyhq.com wrote:
>
>>No, but it was decided that Python 3 would have to be backwards
>>incompatible, mainly to sort out the Unicode mess. Given that,
>>the opportunity was taken to clean up some other mistakes as well.
>
> Unicode is just a string of bytes.
No it isn'
On 2023-02-01 09:00:39 -, mutt...@dastardlyhq.com wrote:
> Its not evolution, its revolution. Evolution retains old functionality.
Tell a penguin that it can fly :-)
hp
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer| Story must make more sense than reality.
|_|_) ||
| | | h...
Thank you all.
I'm not familiar with snap update but I did `sudo apt update` & `sudo apt
upgrade`, but about one or two months ago.
אורי
u...@speedy.net
On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 7:33 PM Jack Dangler wrote:
> Ari
>
> Have you tried running a snap update?
>
> Regards
>
> יַעֲקֹב
>
> On 2/1/23 11:
Ari
Have you tried running a snap update?
Regards
יַעֲקֹב
On 2/1/23 11:31, אורי wrote:
Hi,
I have a server with Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS and the Python version there
is Python 3.10.6. Is there a safe way to upgrade to the latest version of
Python 3.10 (3.10.9)? I tried with the OS update and upgra
On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 11:59:25 +1300
Greg Ewing wrote:
>On 31/01/23 10:24 pm, mutt...@dastardlyhq.com wrote:
>> All languages have their ugly corners due to initial design mistakes and/or
>> constraints. Eg: java with the special behaviour of its string class, C++
>> with "=0" pure virtual declaratio
On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 08:56:40 - (UTC), Muttley wrote:
> Why couldn't they just keep "print" and call the function , oh I dunno,
> "printf" ?
Why does every language have to invent their own function to
print to the console that is very similar but not the same as the rest of
the herd?
--
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 21:00:53 +
Mark Bourne wrote:
>Greg Ewing wrote:
>> On 30/01/23 10:41 pm, mutt...@dastardlyhq.com wrote:
>>> What was the point of the upheaval of converting
>>> the print command in python 2 into a function in python 3 if as a
>>> function
>>> print() doesn't return anyth
On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 13:17:33 +1300
dn wrote:
>On 01/02/2023 11.59, Greg Ewing wrote:
>> On 31/01/23 10:24 pm, mutt...@dastardlyhq.com wrote:
>>> All languages have their ugly corners due to initial design mistakes
>>> and/or
>>> constraints. Eg: java with the special behaviour of its string class,
On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 at 03:33, אורי wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a server with Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS and the Python version there
> is Python 3.10.6. Is there a safe way to upgrade to the latest version of
> Python 3.10 (3.10.9)? I tried with the OS update and upgrade but the Python
> version remaine
>
>
> I have a server with Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS and the Python version there
> is Python 3.10.6. Is there a safe way to upgrade to the latest version of
> Python 3.10 (3.10.9)? I tried with the OS update and upgrade but the Python
> version remained the same.
>
> I have an Ubuntu 22.04 system. The in
On 2023-02-01, אורי wrote:
> I have a server with Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS and the Python version there
> is Python 3.10.6. Is there a safe way to upgrade to the latest version of
> Python 3.10 (3.10.9)? I tried with the OS update and upgrade but the Python
> version remained the same.
This is an Ubun
Hi,
I have a server with Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS and the Python version there
is Python 3.10.6. Is there a safe way to upgrade to the latest version of
Python 3.10 (3.10.9)? I tried with the OS update and upgrade but the Python
version remained the same.
Thanks,
אורי
u...@speedy.net
--
https://mail.p
21 matches
Mail list logo
