On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 at 04:26, <mutt...@dastardlyhq.com> wrote: > > Its not evolution, its revolution. Evolution retains old functionality. >
By the way, I'd like to see your opinions on eternal retention of old functionality. Which of these features are you willing to put effort into supporting? 1) Long integer constants eg 1234L which are the long type rather than the int type 2) dict.has_key method, doing the same job as "key in dict" 3) The input() function, which automatically evals what was entered at the keyboard 4) `x` which does the same as repr(x) 5) "from module import *" inside a function Retaining old functionality is all well and good, but there are limits, especially when the old functionality is downright wrong (input vs raw_input). Before you complain about other people's decisions, find out how many hours of YOUR time you're willing to invest into a project. Or alternatively, how many dollars you would spend on it. Let's pretend that you can pay for as many core Python developers as you like for USD 150,000 a year each. (See job posting https://jobs.pyfound.org/apply/TwgMP1b4OV/Security-Developer-In-Residence for where I got that figure from.) How many are you personally willing to hire in order to have these features maintained? It's easy to whine. Much harder to actually do something about it. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
