Re: Replacement for Mailman

2021-06-08 Thread Jon Ribbens via Python-list
On 2021-06-08, Terry Reedy wrote: > On 6/8/2021 4:36 PM, Jon Ribbens via Python-list wrote: >> On 2021-06-08, Grant Edwards wrote: >>> On 2021-06-08, Paul Bryan wrote: How about Mailman 3.x on Python 3.x? >>> >>> According to https://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/requirements.html >>> mailma

Re: Replacement for Mailman

2021-06-08 Thread Mats Wichmann
On 6/8/21 5:34 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 8:46 AM Jon Ribbens via Python-list wrote: On 2021-06-08, Grant Edwards wrote: On 2021-06-08, Paul Bryan wrote: How about Mailman 3.x on Python 3.x? According to https://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/requirements.html mailman

Re: Replacement for Mailman

2021-06-08 Thread Chris Angelico
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 8:46 AM Jon Ribbens via Python-list wrote: > > On 2021-06-08, Grant Edwards wrote: > > On 2021-06-08, Paul Bryan wrote: > >> How about Mailman 3.x on Python 3.x? > > > > According to https://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/requirements.html > > mailman 3.x still requires Pyth

Re: Replacement for Mailman

2021-06-08 Thread Terry Reedy
On 6/8/2021 4:36 PM, Jon Ribbens via Python-list wrote: On 2021-06-08, Grant Edwards wrote: On 2021-06-08, Paul Bryan wrote: How about Mailman 3.x on Python 3.x? According to https://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/requirements.html mailman 3.x still requires Python 2.7 for the archiver and th

Re: Replacement for Mailman

2021-06-08 Thread Terry Reedy
On 6/8/2021 3:08 PM, D'Arcy Cain wrote: Given that mailman still runs under 2.7 and that's being deprecated, It is not 'deprecated'. Rather, official python.org support, including security fixes, has ended. The same is true of 3.x up to 3.5, and 3.6 by the end of the year. I don't know if

Re: Replacement for Mailman

2021-06-08 Thread Jon Ribbens via Python-list
On 2021-06-08, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2021-06-08, Paul Bryan wrote: >> How about Mailman 3.x on Python 3.x? > > According to https://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/requirements.html > mailman 3.x still requires Python 2.7 for the archiver and the web UI. I'm pretty sure that's out of date. --

Re: Replacement for Mailman

2021-06-08 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2021-06-08, Paul Bryan wrote: > How about Mailman 3.x on Python 3.x? According to https://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/requirements.html mailman 3.x still requires Python 2.7 for the archiver and the web UI. -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! Do you guys know we

Re: Replacement for Mailman

2021-06-08 Thread Jon Ribbens via Python-list
On 2021-06-08, D'Arcy Cain wrote: > Given that mailman still runs under 2.7 and that's being deprecated, > does anyone have a suggestion for a replacement? There is always Mailman 3... -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Replacement for Mailman

2021-06-08 Thread Paul Bryan
How about Mailman 3.x on Python 3.x? On Tue, 2021-06-08 at 15:08 -0400, D'Arcy Cain wrote: > Given that mailman still runs under 2.7 and that's being deprecated, > does > anyone have a suggestion for a replacement? > -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Replacement for Mailman

2021-06-08 Thread D'Arcy Cain
Given that mailman still runs under 2.7 and that's being deprecated, does anyone have a suggestion for a replacement? -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain Vybe Networks Inc. A unit of Excelsior Solutions Corporation - Propelling Business Forward http://www.VybeNetworks.com/ IM:da...@vybenetworks.com VoIP: sip:da.

Re: Neither pdb or print() displays the bug [FIXED]

2021-06-08 Thread Rich Shepard
On Tue, 1 Jun 2021, Rich Shepard wrote: I'm stuck with neither approach (pdb, print()) working. I moved the database code to a separate module, datasource.py, and when I run the activitytypes.py module (using pdb and having entered print() statements at various places in both the datasource and