Re: [Python-buildbots] adding "installed Python" buildbots to the stable list

2016-08-01 Thread Nick Coghlan
/issue24773#msg271313 > I'm not sure which ones are new, but there are > definitely several more than there used to be. Definitely a nice mix of distros and architectures on the Linux side of things now. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com |

Re: [Python-buildbots] Email notifications on buildbot failures

2017-05-09 Thread Nick Coghlan
enerating too many false alarms (i.e. problems with the buildbots rather than problems with the test results). Separating out a "stable" subset of buildbots that were expected to stay green came later. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australi

[Python-buildbots] FreeBSD 10 buildbot may need a nudge

2017-06-24 Thread Nick Coghlan
://buildbot.python.org/all/buildslaves/koobs-freebsd10 Cheers, Nick. P.S. Thanks for providing these Kubilay! They've been invaluable in attempting to get the PEP 538 locale coercion behaving sensibly on FreeBSD (and hence hopefully other BSD variants as well). -- Nick Coghlan |

[Python-buildbots] Linux buildbots with the vm_socket.h kernel header?

2017-07-02 Thread Nick Coghlan
nning sufficiently recent Linux distros that they actually have this header? If not, it would probably make sense to wait for at least one of them to be updated before we accept the change. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com

Re: [Python-buildbots] Moving Python.org to Buildbot 9 + Python 3

2017-09-20 Thread Nick Coghlan
go with pre-merge CI on Linux and Windows, and only run post-merge testing across the entire fleet) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ___ Python-Buildbots mailing list Python-Buildbots@python.org https:

Re: [Python-buildbots] The process of adding my buildbot worker to the buildbot fleet

2019-02-26 Thread Nick Coghlan
ildbots only run on commits that have been reviewed and accepted by a core developer, there's always a chance of someone's credentials getting compromised and problems being caused as a result. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia

Re: [Python-buildbots] Idea: have a different buildbot server for unstable workers?

2019-03-07 Thread Nick Coghlan
se going out. Our stable/unstable split is similar, so if using a separate master would make that easier to manage than the existing "stable" tag [1], it seems like a reasonable idea to me. Cheers, Nick. [1] https://buildbot.python.org/stable/ -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.

Re: [Python-buildbots] Finally ! Many thanks!

2019-06-19 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Sun, 16 Jun 2019 at 22:22, Michael wrote: > > Finally, got to this point that the tests are all passing on the bot - 3.X!! Huzzah! Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ___ Python-Buildbots mailin

Re: [Python-buildbots] Some more Fedora and RHEL machines willing to join the fleet

2019-07-07 Thread Nick Coghlan
s, > > Charalampos Stratakis > Software Engineer > Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat > ___ > Python-Buildbots mailing list > Python-Buildbots@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-buildbots -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ___ Python-Buildbots mailing list Python-Buildbots@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-buildbots

[Python-buildbots] Re: No notification mails for AIX bots - why?

2020-03-13 Thread Nick Coghlan
something > that can be fixed by anyone. Does the buildbot master need to be a physical machine? Or should we be talking to the PSF about potentially moving it onto their cloud hosting infrastructure? Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com