On 10 May 2017 at 02:11, Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+py...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Gregory P. Smith <g...@krypto.org> wrote: >>> Please do not send automated buildbot state transition mail to _this_ >>> list. Leave this low traffic list to communication from humans about >>> buildbots and infrastructure (the purpose as I understand it). > > That is indeed the intended purpose :) > >> Agreed. Maybe a new list "buildbot-sta...@python.org"? > > I'd agree with this, or with using python-checkins@. Dusty, commented > code in the master config looks like notifications used to go there, > but it was before my time and I don't know why it was stopped (if > indeed it ever happened).
My vague recollection is that it was originally turned on, but then switched off for generating too many false alarms (i.e. problems with the buildbots rather than problems with the test results). Separating out a "stable" subset of buildbots that were expected to stay green came later. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Buildbots mailing list Python-Buildbots@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-buildbots
