https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256558
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Marakasov ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #1)
I have no idea. Why are you asking me? You are python@.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256558
--- Comment #3 from Kubilay Kocak ---
(In reply to Dmitry Marakasov from comment #2)
I'm sorry Dmitry but the proposed patch added a new variable, hence the
question/review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee fo
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256558
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry Marakasov ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #3)
The addition of a new variable is well explained in the first comment. The
questions of why ABIFLAGS is no longer sufficient and when the breakage
happened
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243937
John Hein changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|maintainer-feedback?(jcfyec |maintainer-feedback+
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231555
Goran Mekić changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meka@tilda.center
--- Comment #11 fr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256624
Sergey A. Osokin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ports-b...@freebsd.org |python@FreeBSD.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256624
Sergey A. Osokin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-qa, needs-staging
--
You
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231555
--- Comment #12 from Sergey A. Osokin ---
(In reply to Goran Mekić from comment #11)
Thank you so much, Goran!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256624
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-staging |
Summary|devel/py-pytes
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256624
--- Comment #2 from Goran Mekić ---
As number of ports using pytest is huge, how do we continue? I don't have a
server that can run all those tests.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256624
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #3 fr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256624
--- Comment #4 from Goran Mekić ---
If you refer to {RUN,BUILD}_DEPENDS, yes, you're probably right, but
TEST_DEPENDS will probably yield a much larger port collection dependent on
pytest. I mean, https://www.freshports.org/devel/py-pytest/
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256624
--- Comment #5 from Thierry Thomas ---
Such a command line will list all ports using devel/py-pytest in TEST_DEPENDS:
$ find /usr/ports -type d ! -name files -print -exec make -V TEST_DEPENDS -C {}
\; 2>/dev/null | grep -B 1 devel/py-pytes
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256699
Bug ID: 256699
Summary: building lang/python38 fails when IPv6 not set up
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: i386
OS: Any
Status: New
Bugzilla Automation has asked freebsd-python (Nobody)
for maintainer-feedback:
Bug 256699: building lang/python38 fails when IPv6 not set up
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256699
--- Description ---
Building python38 on poudriere in a i386 jail on an amd64 host (FreeBSD 12.2
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256705
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||maintainer-feedback?(timp87
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256699
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||maintainer-feedback?(freebs
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256699
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/raspberr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256699
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|building lang/python38 |lang/python38: Fails to
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256705
--- Comment #2 from tim...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #1)
Thanks for this fast reply!
- Can you describe a bit more your thoughts about strip?
- It build .so during installation
https://github.com/google/jsonnet/b
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256705
--- Comment #3 from Kubilay Kocak ---
(In reply to timp87 from comment #2)
The strip method in the patch has a hardcoded python version (38). It will fail
for all other versions.
It looks like they're using make to build libraries (not th
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256706
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bdrew...@freebsd.org,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256141
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|merge-quarterly?|merge-quarterly+
--
You are recei
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256706
--- Comment #2 from Guido Falsi ---
The calibre port has a minimum requirement of python 3.8. This is due to
upstream development targeting that version and the code actually including
statements incompatible with python 3.7
Not sure if th
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256699
--- Comment #4 from freeb...@spm.s.deo.rodeo ---
Created attachment 225931
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=225931&action=edit
Build logs for python37 & python38 + make.conf
lang/python37 builds fine, lang/python38
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256699
--- Comment #5 from freeb...@spm.s.deo.rodeo ---
The information from my last comment was not entirely correct.
Actually I disabled the IPv6 option for python37. When I enable it the build
fails, just like for python38. Conversely, when I d
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256705
--- Comment #4 from Pavel Timofeev ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #3)
Thanks, initially I thought 38 is a line number in Makefile or something. I
just missed thath.
Yep, depending on jsonnet shared lib would be great, but they
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252424
Yasuhiro Kimura changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #225228|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256624
--- Comment #6 from Goran Mekić ---
Tested with "make -DBATCH test" and following ports reported no problems:
cad/netgen
devel/py-pytest-factoryboy
www/py-textile
devel/py-pytest-aiohttp
devel/py-pytest-asyncio
devel/py-pytest-azurepipeline
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and ob
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252424
--- Comment #9 from Kubilay Kocak ---
(In reply to Yasuhiro Kimura from comment #8)
Much appreciated Yasuhirosan
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252424
--- Comment #10 from Kubilay Kocak ---
(In reply to Yasuhiro Kimura from comment #8)
Apologies, I forgot to ask... do all of the for each port match
those that are defined in the upstream sources?
In particular:
- Any " or >= specifier
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252424
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #225952||maintainer-approval?(python
Kubilay Kocak has asked freebsd-python (Nobody)
for maintainer-approval:
Bug 252424: Mk/Uses/python.mk: Remove broken shared macros (chase removal of
graphics/py-pillow6)
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252424
Attachment 225952: Updated patch file
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzi
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252424
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|maintainer-feedback?(python |maintainer-feedback+
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256624
--- Comment #7 from Kubilay Kocak ---
(In reply to Goran Mekić from comment #6)
Thank you for running this QAS Goran
Can you detail the failure modes experienced? Such as the "The ports that fail
even on main branch:" group?
--
You are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256624
--- Comment #8 from Kubilay Kocak ---
For any of the failure cases that are ports bugs (incorrectly incompletely
specified version specs of *_DEPENDS), any changes are
Approved by: portmgr (blanket: bugfix)
And wont require issues to be
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256705
--- Comment #5 from Kubilay Kocak ---
(In reply to Pavel Timofeev from comment #4)
Try removing the dependency sources in WRKSRC post-extract and adding
USES=localbase which will setup CFLAGS/LDFLAGS to /usr/local/{include,lib}
--
You ar
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256705
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252424
--- Comment #11 from Yasuhiro Kimura ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #10)
My patch simply replaces "${PY_PILLOW}" in Makefile of each port with
"${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}pillow>=7.0.0:graphics/py-pillow@${PY_FLAVOR}".
So if these
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252424
--- Comment #12 from Kubilay Kocak ---
(In reply to Yasuhiro Kimura from comment #11)
We'll want to check that those lines match the source specifiers.
See Also: bug 243665 comment 1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256624
--- Comment #9 from Goran Mekić ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #7)
I have no idea what the errors were, I didn't write them down.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256624
Goran Mekić changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||256745
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256624
--- Comment #10 from Goran Mekić ---
Updating pytest-flask also makes it pass the tests, but all other ports are
either on latest version or fail for some reason (I'm suspecting some deeper
dependency needs update). Failing ports:
devel/py
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256705
Pavel Timofeev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #225918|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256705
--- Comment #7 from Kubilay Kocak ---
(In reply to Pavel Timofeev from comment #6)
Nice work Pavel. Does this pass QA (poudriere) for default and a non default
Python version?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256624
--- Comment #11 from Goran Mekić ---
What's our next move?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256705
--- Comment #8 from Pavel Timofeev ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #7)
Lemme run it and attach logs
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256705
--- Comment #9 from Pavel Timofeev ---
Poudriere found small issue.
Fixing it and rerunning
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256705
Pavel Timofeev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #225986|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256705
--- Comment #11 from Pavel Timofeev ---
Created attachment 226003
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=226003&action=edit
py38-jsonnet-0.17.0.log
Running against py36, py37 and py39 also. Stay tuned ;)
--
You are rec
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256705
--- Comment #12 from Pavel Timofeev ---
Created attachment 226004
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=226004&action=edit
py37-jsonnet-0.17.0.log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256705
--- Comment #13 from Pavel Timofeev ---
Created attachment 226005
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=226005&action=edit
py36-jsonnet-0.17.0.log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256705
--- Comment #14 from Pavel Timofeev ---
Created attachment 226007
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=226007&action=edit
py39-jsonnet-0.17.0.log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256705
--- Comment #15 from Pavel Timofeev ---
I've tested it against all available in ports tree python version. See attached
poudriere logs. But I did it only on FreeBSD 13.0 amd64 as I don't have other
machines.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256219
--- Comment #24 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch main references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=f3e4dbcb5ff2fe2a018f78f396a4247f1dd32cc9
commit f3e4dbcb5ff2fe2a018f78f396a4247f1dd32cc9
Author:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256219
Li-Wen Hsu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lw...@freebsd.org
Resolution|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256624
--- Comment #12 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch main references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=0c6ce3c9c26d878acf943d53fb2a01ba602b71c2
commit 0c6ce3c9c26d878acf943d53fb2a01ba602b71c2
Author:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256624
--- Comment #13 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch main references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=d07f92b9bf00821e372f003d698525cd1ae19dc2
commit d07f92b9bf00821e372f003d698525cd1ae19dc2
Author:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256624
Kevin Bowling changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|Open
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256624
Kevin Bowling changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|python@FreeBSD.org |kbowl...@freebsd.org
Key
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256361
--- Comment #4 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch main references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=b774f59d2df7d9df10c3b39f68796360e79c89e8
commit b774f59d2df7d9df10c3b39f68796360e79c89e8
Author:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256361
--- Comment #5 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch 2021Q2 references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=3e55273e25e24d0707265e48545a31016e749db3
commit 3e55273e25e24d0707265e48545a31016e749db3
Author:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256361
Kevin Bowling changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kbowl...@freebsd.org
S
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256705
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|maintainer-feedback?(timp87 |maintainer-feedback+
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256705
--- Comment #17 from Pavel Timofeev ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #16)
This flag tells the linked to strip shared lib which is part of this port
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256705
--- Comment #18 from Kubilay Kocak ---
(In reply to Pavel Timofeev from comment #17)
Ah ok, yep, definitely use post-install: STRIP_CMD for this, as
it has support for WITH_DEBUG at the framework level
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256705
Pavel Timofeev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #226002|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256705
Pavel Timofeev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #226024|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251626
Yuri Victorovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||256814
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256219
--- Comment #26 from John Hein ---
(In reply to Li-Wen Hsu from comment #25)
Adjusting vuxml was fine, but it papers over the problem of the incorrect
version specification. However, since 3.7.4 never made it into the ports tree,
the incor
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256391
Danilo G. Baio changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|python@FreeBSD.org |db...@freebsd.org
Fl
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256391
--- Comment #2 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch main references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=c9afda5a14a3c39ccb8394f2e5ab4455870a82a8
commit c9afda5a14a3c39ccb8394f2e5ab4455870a82a8
Author:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256826
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|dns/py-namebench fails to |dns/py-namebench: Fails to
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256832
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||python@FreeBSD.org,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256705
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easy
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256705
--- Comment #21 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch main references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=f091166687409804b91a1a041fb715d24f25c028
commit f091166687409804b91a1a041fb715d24f25c028
Author:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256705
Kevin Bowling changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|ports-b..
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256832
--- Comment #2 from ru...@verweg.com ---
Created attachment 226058
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=226058&action=edit
change use of command_interpreter in procname for rc.d files
This is a proposed patch to let the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256832
--- Comment #3 from ru...@verweg.com ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #1)
I see two things,
I happen to have netbox installed on the same system as the salt minion, and
net-mgmt/netbox installs devel/py-setproctitle as a indirec
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256391
--- Comment #3 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch 2021Q2 references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=47b064398715c91f65bea9828a58c0ebd7018c13
commit 47b064398715c91f65bea9828a58c0ebd7018c13
Author:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256391
Danilo G. Baio changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|merge-quarterly?|merge-quarterly+
Resoluti
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246328
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||feature, needs-patch,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246328
--- Comment #33 from Kubilay Kocak ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #32)
Also, the upstream project provides tests, so adding TEST_DEPENDS,. defining a
do-test target and confirming the test suite passes would be great.
See:
ht
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256705
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|Closed
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256705
--- Comment #24 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch main references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=65fbda12aea9ace689972d9c7e726ceb706c876f
commit 65fbda12aea9ace689972d9c7e726ceb706c876f
Author:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246328
--- Comment #34 from Daniel Menelkir ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #33)
I'm making the changes. One thing I don't get it is the test phase (I didn't
find anything documented), how should I declare the test phase? Something lik
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246328
Daniel Menelkir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #226066|0 |1
is obsolete|
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and ob
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246328
--- Comment #36 from Kubilay Kocak ---
(In reply to Daniel Menelkir from comment #34)
Ahh sorry.
TEST_DEPENDS are for dependencies on ports that the port depends on for the
'test' target' (like BUILD / RUN depends for other stages)
You c
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256705
Kevin Bowling changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|In Progre
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246328
Daniel Menelkir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #226081|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246328
--- Comment #38 from Kubilay Kocak ---
Please add any upstream declared to *_DEPENDS lines, and minor
nits:
- Add tab for MASTER_SITES line
- Add -v (verbose) for unittest invocation (one liner per test in output)
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256872
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|devel/py-zipp: configure|devel/py-zipp: Fails to
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256872
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-patch
Severity|Aff
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256872
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-qa|
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246328
Daniel Menelkir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #226101|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256872
--- Comment #3 from Kubilay Kocak ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #2)
I missed this in the review, but Kai (via IRC) notes that 'toml' should be
satisfied via the TOML option in setuptools_scm, which is enabled by default,
so t
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256872
--- Comment #4 from Philipp Engel ---
Kubilay: Thank you. As you said, the disabled TOML option in
devel/py-setuptools_scm caused the issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256872
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|Affects Many People |Affects Some People
--- Comment #5
1201 - 1300 of 5495 matches
Mail list logo
