https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256872
--- Comment #3 from Kubilay Kocak <ko...@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #2) I missed this in the review, but Kai (via IRC) notes that 'toml' should be satisfied via the TOML option in setuptools_scm, which is enabled by default, so this is likely a case of that option being disabled. Is that the case Philipp? Nevertheless, ports (like this one) must depend explicitly on their dependencies optional dependencies (transitively), and not rely on their presence (which, is... optional). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
