Re: [PyMOL] morph issues

2016-04-26 Thread harold steinberg
Thank you both for taking the time to work this out, and explain how and why it works! > On Apr 26, 2016, at 8:14 AM, Thomas Holder > wrote: > > Hi Adam and Annemarie, > > There are no alt location in these files. In the slash notation, the second > item is the segment identifier, which fo

Re: [PyMOL] morph issues

2016-04-26 Thread Honegger Annemarie
OK, after some trial and error I have found out a way that works. The two structures have the corresponding chains in different orders and with different chain labels: You can copy-paste the following commands into Pymol to follow that I did: #---

Re: [PyMOL] morph issues

2016-04-26 Thread Thomas Holder
Hi Adam and Annemarie, There are no alt location in these files. In the slash notation, the second item is the segment identifier, which for mmCIF files in the label_asym_id field (the third item, chain, is the auth_asym_id field). For this example, the label_asym_id (segi) should be easier to

Re: [PyMOL] morph issues

2016-04-26 Thread harold steinberg
When I use the remove command it seems to be removing atoms. There is no explanation in the pymol wiki about how to specify details to the command. Since I have multiple chains I’m not sure if I have to use it multiple times (once on each chain) and I’m also not sure if I have to specify the fir

Re: [PyMOL] morph issues

2016-04-26 Thread harold steinberg
I ask because if I use the command "remove (not alt “”+A)” every atom is erased from the session. > On Apr 26, 2016, at 6:16 AM, harold steinberg > wrote: > > Hi Annemarie, > > Thank you for the answer. Do you know the command to remove the alternative > conformation? > > >> On Apr 26, 20

Re: [PyMOL] morph issues

2016-04-26 Thread harold steinberg
Hi Annemarie, Thank you for the answer. Do you know the command to remove the alternative conformation? > On Apr 26, 2016, at 4:31 AM, Honegger Annemarie wrote: > > Hi Adam > > This additional letter means that you have an alternative conformation for > the atom, therefore you do not have a

Re: [PyMOL] morph issues

2016-04-26 Thread Honegger Annemarie
Hi Adam This additional letter means that you have an alternative conformation for the atom, therefore you do not have a 1:1 correspondence between the atoms in the two endpoints of the morph. If you eliminate the alternative conformations (remove (not alt “”+A)) or restrict the selection to t