On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
[...]
>> I originally thought Traversal was the same as TurboGears dispatch and
>> wrote that in some documentation; I'll change those. The truth may be
>> that TurboGears has a dispatching model that is not in Pyramid, but I
>> don't see wh
I don't know what all you guys are smoking with this half-cocked "routes"
system. Personally it makes no sense to me. I started developing web pages
by putting index.html in a folder, and if I visited that folder I would see
index.html. Now I put an object in a nested dict, the framework finds it,
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:01 PM, jorge.var...@gmail.com
wrote:
> On Nov 24, 2:41 am, Mike Orr wrote:
>> the first matching route specifies which view callable to invoke. The
>> other way is called Traversal, which is familiar to BFG, TurboGears,
>> and Zope users.
^Wrong.
This is whe
On Nov 24, 2:41 am, Mike Orr wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Mike Orr wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 19:35 -0800, Mike Orr wrote:
> >>> I wonder if it would be clearer to to put the URL Dispatch chapter
> >>> before Context
On Nov 23, 9:48 pm, Ben Bangert wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2010, at 5:30 PM, Mike Orr wrote:
>
> > It sounds good in general. Will it still have a default index view
> > with a welcome page? I think that's a good minimum to get people
> > started. It saves user frustration and questions on the list, "How
Chris/Mike/Rob,
*Thank you!* This discussion has help me immensely. I can see now that
the config.add_handler() / @action combination is probably the best
path for someone in my position to go down, and that I was probably
mixing the traversal/context stuff up with my TurboGears-ish thinking.
I h
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 16:27 -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 13:13 -0800, Mike Orr wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
> > >> This move is natural based on BFG's history, and the new situation of
> > >> future Pylons newbies, which is forcing Pyr
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 13:13 -0800, Mike Orr wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
> >> This move is natural based on BFG's history, and the new situation of
> >> future Pylons newbies, which is forcing Pyramid to be more accessible
> >> and simpler out of the box, rather
as a former zope / plone developer, i've got quite a lot of experience
with traversal and view lookup, so maybe i'll be able to help here.
On 12/6/10 10:43 AM, Seth wrote:
Okay, so I think I'm just having a hard time grokking the idea of a
"context" (even after beating myself to death with the
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
>> This move is natural based on BFG's history, and the new situation of
>> future Pylons newbies, which is forcing Pyramid to be more accessible
>> and simpler out of the box, rather than just being a "hackers'
>> framework" as BFG was.
>
>
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 12:14 -0800, Mike Orr wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Seth wrote:
> > 1. What would a larger Pyramid app look like directory/module wise?
> > Wouldn't this look more like a default Pylons 1/TG 2 setup?
> > (controllers-*ahem*-views in a "views" dir, models in a "mod
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 10:43 -0800, Seth wrote:
> Okay, so I think I'm just having a hard time grokking the idea of a
> "context" (even after beating myself to death with the documentation).
>
>
> With that in mind, let me rephrase my initial question with a more
> high-level question:
>
> How is
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Seth wrote:
> 1. What would a larger Pyramid app look like directory/module wise?
> Wouldn't this look more like a default Pylons 1/TG 2 setup?
> (controllers-*ahem*-views in a "views" dir, models in a "models" dir,
> etc)
URL Dispatch has "view handlers", which a
Okay, so I think I'm just having a hard time grokking the idea of a
"context" (even after beating myself to death with the documentation).
With that in mind, let me rephrase my initial question with a more
high-level question:
How is a large web application in Pyramid supposed to look?
Yes, th
14 matches
Mail list logo
