> It’s not a “shame” that we do not integrate this, it’s a feature that we
> include only code fits into the product. The way it should work is defined,
> but this guy does not followed this idea. This is ok for me but it’s clear
> that in this case we will not integrate it.
My two cents ;)
Ye
Hi guys,
I'm interested in contributing code/features for Proxmox, and want to know
where to begin.
(I've already contributed with Danish translation... small thing, I know)
It's important to me to know how my code/features will be included in the
official release, and not only as my private p
> > Fx I don’t want to come in a situation like Kamil where he develop a
> > very nice (in my opinion) feature – differential backup – which you
> > don’t want to include in the release (don’t know exact reason though)
> > http://ayufan.eu/projects/proxmox-ve-differential-backups/
>
> I always tol
> Fx I don’t want to come in a situation like Kamil where he develop a very nice
> (in my opinion) feature – differential backup – which you don’t want to
> include in the release (don’t know exact reason though)
> http://ayufan.eu/projects/proxmox-ve-differential-backups/
I always told them that
Hi guys,
I'm interested in contributing code/features for Proxmox, and want to know
where to begin.
(I've already contributed with Danish translation. small thing, I know)
It's important to me to know how my code/features will be included in the
official release, and not only as my private
