> It’s not a “shame” that we do not integrate this, it’s a feature that we > include only code fits into the product. The way it should work is defined, > but this guy does not followed this idea. This is ok for me but it’s clear > that in this case we will not integrate it.
My two cents ;) Yeah. We know that. My patches are not perfect either. There are cases where they fails to do the job right. Yet i use it for quite a long time and they work just fine. The solution I chose to distribute them is simple and I have many happy users :) Kamil
_______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
