this? Alternatively, can you
> make a recommendation for module best practices going forward.
>
Have you looked at Hiera yet Ryan? An awful lot of this is baked into it,
and you may find you don't need to set these at the ENC level.
--
Nigel Kersten
Product Manager, Puppet Labs
--
You re
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:52 AM, Felix Frank <
felix.fr...@alumni.tu-berlin.de> wrote:
>
> Is there a good reason that this function is even retained in recent
> versions of puppet? I have yet to encounter an instance where it can be
> used cleanly.
>
I'll start another thread about this, but I'd
d the
additional work you need to do to ensure that that dependency is always
fulfilled overcomes any simplicity advantage that might otherwise exist."
--
Nigel Kersten
Product Manager, Puppet Labs
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet
ther pair of cents.
>
> Cheers,
> Felix
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email t
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Walter Heck wrote:
> What if there was some standardised way modules expose a sort of list
> of requirements or an API of some sort?
I had this thought the other day, but more focused around the higher level
problem of dependency specification and consumption th
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Walter Heck wrote:
> > I had this thought the other day, but more focused around the higher
> level
> > problem of dependency specification and consumption than Packages in
> > particular.
> Yeah, since that is something that is currently kind of difficult to
> im
t;>> Groups "Puppet Users" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>&g
, Shark River Technical Solutions LLC
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> puppe
t;
(We moved to git-style subcommands a while ago)
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Peter Berghold wrote:
> master and agent are on the same box. they should be the same version.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
>> This looks like you've got a
ers/-/VChRtFes9wEJ.
> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
>
--
>
> # puppetmasterd --version
> 2.7.9
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Peter Berghold
> wrote:
>
>> There is only one version of puppet (agent and master) on the system.
>> This system was installed from bare metal this morning.
>>
>> On Jan 25, 2012
g to do it inside all your manifests?
If we have:
* puppet module tool supporting dependencies and generating module metadata
* classes not loading if their dependencies aren't satisfied (or at the
least big warnings)
do we really need defined()?
--
Nigel Kersten
Product Manager, Puppet La
on control.
Functionality I've found useful in the past here was:
* check whether the changed manifests parse
* verify whether foreign class dependencies are fulfilled
* verify whether references to file sources actually exist
etc etc
--
Nigel Kersten
Product Manager, Puppet Labs
--
I just wanted to post to this thread to primarily encourage you all to keep
brainstorming, and to make it clear that I'm paying close attention. :)
--
Nigel Kersten
Product Manager, Puppet Labs
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Us
the same goal.
What kind of a repository do we want?
--
Nigel Kersten
Product Manager, Puppet Labs
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscr
oogle Groups
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users
u are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.goo
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Peter Berghold wrote:
> Do I remember correctly that puppet-forge is no longer accepting uploads?
I don't think so. Did you run into a problem uploading?
--
Nigel Kersten
Product Manager, Puppet Labs
--
You received this message because you are subsc
or
> messages. The file in question was a tar.gz file yet nothing I did seemed
> to fix the problem. I'll try again later and see if I have better luck..
>
Please let me know if you're still hitting that, and we'll chase it up.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 1
e from this group, send email to
> > > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Gary Larizza
> > Professional Services
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 5:21 AM, Markus Falb wrote:
>
> And Question 3, finally: Does it make sense to you what I am trying to
> do, actually?
It feels significantly simpler for you to use hiera to pick out values that
you then pass to instances of defines, rather than baking hiera into the
def
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Jonathan Proulx wrote:
> I'm OK with flushing all my certs and starting over, but I have a
> couple of questions. How does the puppet CA populate the altName
> field? and can I make it do what I want for both the CA and the non-CA
> servers or do I just need to su
gt; To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=
to provide this as a service by us, and it's
difficult to get that level of integration with StackExchange.
I would like to point out that we've got a growing ServerFault community
under the 'puppet' tag, and there are some great people answering Puppet
questions there.
This
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Brian Gupta
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Daniel Pittman
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 22:53, Denmat wrote:
>>> &
basic of the most basic puppet setup, so
> I'm a fan
No apologies necessary at all, and certainly no panic :)
We also love hearing stories about Puppet pulling butts out of fires :)
>
> On 3 Apr 2012, at 21:13, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
>>
>> We do want to be running thi
ups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
>>
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are sub
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Chip Schweiss wrote:
> I'm in the process of scalling my puppet master to two server with a
> separate CA. My plan was to establish a new CA and reissue
> certificates. Part way through the process I noticed a behavior that
> seems a bit alarming.
>
> With one
ple
locations on disk that you want modules to be installed into, which doesn't
fit very well with traditional package management systems.
>
> I think it's good to split out these things, as it would allow us to
> properly add a nagios dep to the hypothetical puppet-module-nagi
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Tim Mooney wrote:
> In regard to: Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: [Puppet Users] Telly: Nagios types...:
>
>
> Todd, welcome and I feel your pain. Trust me, I pushed every way I
>> could to use native packages as our module deliver mechanism. However
>> we have some odd
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Geoff Davis wrote:
> I'm doing some work on module development inside of a Vagrant VM of CentOS
> 6.2. This VM has the community version of Puppet installed (2.7.13 I
> think), but that doesn't include Hiera by default.
>
> My module is dependent on Nan Liu's pup
This should get reported as a bug though.
We should probably only accept absolute paths for the 'path' parameter, and
"false" should get interpreted as the boolean.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Peter Bukowinski wrote:
> Glad you got it sorted. You've discovered the importance of quoting and
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:18 AM, JA wrote:
> Stefan;
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. However, we are running puppet via
> Passenger. So, I assume I need to update the config.ru file. Do you
> have any suggestions about that? Greatly appreciate your help and
> advice!
>
Look for the ARGV line
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 4:19 AM, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "John Kennedy"
> > To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 11:59:49 AM
> > Subject: [Puppet Users] Using fact to determine node environment
> >
> > We have a custom fact tha
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 8:18 AM, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Nigel Kersten"
> > To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 4:10:16 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] Using fact to determine
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 8:37 AM, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
>
> > > Unless something broke it recently, I ran for years with a fact
> > > that
> > > returned ":environment" and didn't set it in puppet.conf at all.
> >
> > yes, it broke. You'll get a mix of files from one environment and
> > classes
> > fr
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 8:53 AM, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
>
> > > > I think you're thinking of the ENC setting the environment, not a
> > > > fact called 'environment' RI?
> > >
> > > nope.
> > >
> > >
> > > Anyone got a bug # for this?
> >
> > pretty sure there was one but couldnt find it so I just kno
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Trevor Vaughan wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> With the integration of Hiera, is the extlookup functionality being
> deprecated?
>
> If so, I would like to ask that the team add a Hiera backend for the
> existing extlookup data sources.
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Derek J. Balling wrote:
>
> On May 3, 2012, at 1:05 PM, Pieter van de Bruggen wrote:
>
> As many of you may be aware, Hiera will be tightly integrated into Puppet
> in the upcoming release of Puppet 3.0.
>
> What will this mean for sites that have specifically avoi
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Derek J. Balling wrote:
>
> On May 7, 2012, at 11:54 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> > Yes. If you're not planning to externalize data at all, the only
> difference you'll see is that you'll now have Hiera installed on your
> s
>>
>> James Turnbull
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/nMXLUbPYvfgJ.
> To post to th
(removed puppet-announce to try and head off more people compounding my
error)
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Matt wrote:
>
>> Reading the documentation so far, it looks like it has the option to
>> quer
t; group.
> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
>
>
--
Nigel
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Erik Dalén wrote:
> On 14 May 2012 18:35, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Alex Harvey
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi list,
> >>
> >> I am looking at configuration management
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
>
>
--
Nigel Kersten | http://puppetlabs.com | @nigelkersten
Schedule Meetings at: http://tun
that you're defining an environment with the name
"master" David ?
Are you doing this in a block like: "[master]" or by using
$environment in the modulepath/manifest directives ?
--
Nigel Kersten | http://puppetlabs.com | @nigelkersten
Schedule Meetings at: http://tungle.me/ni
mail to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
--
Nigel Kersten | http://puppetlabs.com | @nigelkersten
Sc
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Gabriel Filion wrote:
> On 11-06-16 03:47 PM, Nathan Clemons wrote:
> > Or what you might want to do is to create a specific common directory
> > for code that should be shared, and per-environment directories which
> > contain code that should not be shared. If y
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 7:15 AM, TJ Yang wrote:
>
> I am referring to puppet agent/client.
> I hope future version can support this certificate reset/cleanup on
> puppet agent.
If you really do want agents to be able to clean certificates on the master,
you can open up the API Access Control in
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:50 AM, Andreas Kuntzagk <
andreas.kuntz...@mdc-berlin.de> wrote:
> Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
>>
>> I feel we've produced inconsistencies here, and given I added the
>> group membership support for OS X, it's largely my fault :)
>&g
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Guy Matz wrote:
> hi,
> i get the following error when trying to use a template with XML in it:
> Could not parse for environment production: Syntax error at '<'
>
> So I tried using the HTML & "codes" for special chars but now get:
> "Could not parse for environm
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Bruce Bushby wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm new to large scale puppet deployment and was hoping the list could
> offer some pointers on "module layout"
>
> My initial "layout" was motivated by a need to "harden" our Linux
> systems. I grouped the various hardening configs
27;'
> debug: /Stage[main]/Ntp/Service[ntp]/subscribe: subscribes to
> File[ntp.conf]
> debug: /Stage[main]/Ntp/File[ntp.conf]/require: requires Package[ntp]
> info: Applying configuration version '1308671777'
> err: /Stage[main]/Ntp/File[ntp.conf]: Could not evalua
subscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
>
>
--
Nigel Kersten
Product, Puppet Labs
@nigelkersten
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users"
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 6:37 AM, Kinzel, David wrote:
> >> this is not directly built into puppet.
> >
> >Is there any specific reason why this is not built into puppet?
> >
> >We've put __addifnosuchline [0] into cdist [1] as one of
> >the most basic features, because it's often needed if you do
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Nico -telmich- Schottelius <
nico-puppet-us...@schottelius.org> wrote:
> Nigel,
>
> Nigel Kersten [Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 07:37:30AM -0700]:
> > [...]
> >
> > It's simple enough at first, [...]
> >
>
> that
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 6:01 AM, jcbollinger wrote:
>
> While I'm on my soapbox, this is one reason why I don't like
> interclass dependencies very much, and why run stages (which magnify
> this problem) need to be approached with caution. There is certainly
> something to be said for the layer o
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Kinzel, David wrote:
>
> I just think having some built-in functions for text patterns would be
> lovely. There are many cases where something like addifnosuchline would
> be perfectly valid. Just because it won't be the solution in all cases
> doesn't mean it shou
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Nico -telmich- Schottelius
wrote:
> Nigel Kersten [Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 07:51:23AM -0700]:
>> nico-puppet-us...@schottelius.org> wrote:
>> [...]
>> I am hesitant for us to put something like this in the core distribution
>> though,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Peter Meier wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
I am hesitant for us to put something like this in the core distribution
though, simply because we know it's a maintenance problem over time.
>>>
>>> Fair enough.
>>>
>>> Though I imag
ured in a public ticket people can watch
very soon, I apologize for the lack of transparency here.
--
Nigel Kersten
Product, Puppet Labs
@nigelkersten
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send emai
d then /etc/puppet/modules/os/manifest/init.pp would include the
> various "pp" components for various hosts lists.
>
> Is this even possible?
>
>
>
>
> On Jun 20, 5:50 pm, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Bruce Bushby wrote:
>>
>>
&g
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Craig White wrote:
> class nginx::install {
> $prerequisites = [ "build-essential", "libcurl4-openssl-dev", "libssl-dev",
> "zlib1g-dev" ]
> case $operatingsystem {
> centos, redhat: {
> }
> debian, ubuntu: {
> package { $prerequisites : ensure =>
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Craig White wrote:
> Nevermind... under control - thanks for the fish
Heh. Great timing, I was just typing up a reply.
Craig, I'd appreciate it if we could try and work out what led you
down the wrong path in terms of syntax so we can try to make sure it
doesn't
ell done!
Glad to hear the docs weren't a big problem, but it does feel like
there's something here that could maybe have been called out in a more
obvious manner in the docs.
--
Nigel Kersten
Product, Puppet Labs
@nigelkersten
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
ameters did not succeed: In the bottom example,
> Puppet would attempt to install packages contained in the class even
> though the nfs share was not mounted.
>
> I realize that the top example is applying the relationship to all
> 'nfs::client' defined types (which is fin
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Craig White wrote:
> 1. I want to require =>
> /etc/puppet/modules/custom/lib/facter/$SOME_CUSTOM_FACT is actually executed
> and the fact is established before a particular package is
> installed/configured. I can't seem to find the proper syntax for requiring
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> Regardless of that, if you can submit a bug report about the failure,
> that would be excellent. Facter *shouldn't* be that easy to break. ;)
Ugh. I missed that there was an error in this case, and yes, we
totally shouldn't gag on such
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Henrik Lindberg
wrote:
> Title says it all... "When will puppet versions later than 2.6.4 be
> available on macports?"
um... when I fix the bug that it's currently suffering and is blocking
updates? :)
It is set to openmaintainer, so anyone can contribute patche
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 7:27 AM, wrote:
> We have often the Problem that some files need to be checked for updates
> faster than the cycle of the puppet agent. I try to solve this with a
> script which tries to download the files directly from the fileserver of
> the puppetmaster. So far i couldn
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 7:41 AM, wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 7:27 AM, wrote:
> >
> >> We have often the Problem that some files need to be checked for updates
> >> faster than the cycle of the puppet agent. I try to solve this with a
> >> script which tries to download the files directly
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Peter Berghold wrote:
>
> err: Could not retrieve catalog from remote server: Error 400 on SERVER: No
> support for http method POST
>
To explain this error a bit more, we've moved the catalog retrieval to a
POST rather than a GET to avoid the compile-time size li
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Jon Jaroker wrote:
>
> After adding both forms of the dependency (the 'collection' as well as
> 'before'), I have not had a failure for the past few days.
>
> I believe my syntax is right and that the issue is specific to the
> dependency. I wonder if a timeout i
I've long wanted the equivalent of a "conffile" in Puppet.
e.g. "replace this file if it's still the same as the one Puppet put down,
but if it's been modified from the default, don't replace it"
I've wanted this in the past for things like a user .rc file, where you want
to be able to continuall
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Jon Jaroker wrote:
>
> Please let me know if you want me to create a bug for this, or whether
> you have debugging or workaround recommendations.
>
I'll read your post a bit more closely later on today, but a quick
suggestion would be to use the --graph output on
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 6:49 AM, jcbollinger wrote:
>
> Note that nscd in particular can be
> configured to be stubbornly ignorant of changes to the authoritative
> files.
>
Tell it like it is brother!
/me considers forming the nscd-haters club...
As an aside that really isn't that relevant to
Has anyone bug reported this yet?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For m
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Michael Halligan wrote:
> I'm running Puppet 2.7.1 on the master as well as the agent and just
> received a new error which doesn't actually reference a module or a file, so
> I'm somewhat stuck as to how to debug this. Any pointers?
> The error is err: Could not r
This need is why we've modified the default ACL in 2.7.x to allow you to
retrieve your own node definitions easily.
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev/browse_thread/thread/fba16b6f26015daa
"If you add a rule like this to puppet 2.7.0rc1 in auth.conf
path ~ ^/node/([^/]+)$
method find
allo
r/sbin/usermod
> -c My user' returned 6: usermod: myuser not found in /etc/passwd
>
> Running the client in debug, I don't see anything to suggest that
> there's an attempt to add the user. That part isn't failing, it
> simply isn't happening. What could
nces/stable/type.html#file
Have a look at recurse and checksum.
--
Nigel Kersten
Product Manager, Puppet Labs
Twitter: @nigelkersten
*Join us for **PuppetConf *<http://www.bit.ly/puppetconfsig>
September 22nd and 23rd in Portland, Oregon, USA.
*
*
--
You received this message because you are s
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Martin Willemsma wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>
> I experience the same. I'm using gem provider to manage puppet and
> facter installed versions. When I recently upgraded a selection of
> nodes to 2.7.1 I saw other not being removed like the way apt is
> doing.
>
> I would lik
`lock'
> /opt/ruby-1.8.6-p287/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/agent.rb:53:in
> `run'
> /opt/ruby-1.8.6-p287/lib/ruby/1.8/sync.rb:229:in `synchronize'
> /opt/ruby-1.8.6-p287/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/agent.rb:53:in
> `run'
> /opt/ruby-1.8.6-p287/lib/ruby/site
ause you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.g
ps
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users
-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
> >
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To post to this
ke jars.
>
> Thanks again
>
> Haitao
>
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Nigel Kersten
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Haitao Jiang
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I just wondering if anyone can point me to the documentation on
t might give a
> > better clue as to why.
> >
> > ken.
> >
> > --
> > "Join us for PuppetConf, September 22nd and 23rd in Portland, OR:
> http://bit.ly/puppetconfsig";
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
&
;yaml'
just do the right thing? If not, I'd post to the puppet-dev list and see if
the more developer-focused crowd can give you a better answer for 0.25.4.
>
> --
> Derek
>
> On Jul 11, 2:56 pm, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Derek
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Jacob Helwig wrote:
>
> This shouldn't actually be necessary. The pkgdmg provider should keep
> track of which things it's installed, so it won't keep trying to install
> the .dmg on every run.
>
>
and for further detail, due to OS X not having a real package man
d up being your fastest
mitigation path.
Even 2.6.9 if you can try it, there have been a few changes since 2.6.4.
I tend to find that a visual scan of a dot file from a --graph run is a good
way to look for explosions in complexity.
--
Nigel Kersten
Product Manager, Puppet Labs
Twitter: @nigelk
t series.
http://docs.puppetlabs.com/learning/ordering.html
--
Nigel Kersten
Product Manager, Puppet Labs
Twitter: @nigelkersten
*Join us for **PuppetConf *<http://www.bit.ly/puppetconfsig>
September 22nd and 23rd in Portland, Oregon, USA.
*
*
--
You received this message because you
ally does become a lot simpler if you avoid 'import' everywhere you
can and just rely upon the class autoloader.
--
Nigel Kersten
Product Manager, Puppet Labs
Twitter: @nigelkersten
*Join us for **PuppetConf *<http://www.bit.ly/puppetconfsig>
September 22nd and 23rd in Portland,
also use collections to do what you want, this is untested, but
something like:
Package <| title != "php" |> {
require => Package['php'],
notify => Service['httpd']
}
should work I believe.
--
Nigel Kersten
Product Manager, Puppet Labs
Twitter: @ni
given Class['a'] -> Class['b'], you get a
> relationship between each of the n resources of Class['a'] and each of
> the m resources of Class['b'], for n x m DAG edges.
>
Note that 2.7.x resolved this relationship explosion, which is one reason I
sug
th for this environment.
* whether you're using 'import' anywhere.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Gus
>
> On Jul 13, 11:03 am, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Peter Meier >wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Pup
f.
If you *really* want this you could implement it reasonably easily in
a custom external node classifier, but it's rather unlikely this would
make it into core.
--
Nigel Kersten
Product Manager, Puppet Labs
Join us for PuppetConf
<http://www.bit.ly/puppetconfsig>
Sept 22/23 Portland, Or
]],
>> > onlyif => "test -e /var/db/.bindscript",}
>>
>> > exec {'blahblah':
>> > command =>'touch /var/db/.bindscript',
>> > path =>['/usr/bin']
>>
>> > }
>>
&
>> ./puppet_sync_sudo2.pp: line 10: owner: command not found
>> ./puppet_sync_sudo2.pp: line 11: syntax error near unexpected token `}'
>> ./puppet_sync_sudo2.pp: line 11: `}'
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> Greetings
>> Andy
>
> --
> You rec
--
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.co
1 - 100 of 1162 matches
Mail list logo
