On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Andy Taylor <andytaylo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm currently trying to work out the best way structure my Puppet > environments and VCS structure. At the moment I'mk working on > something like this: > > Three Git repositories (one for modules, one for Hiera, one for node > manifests) > Multiple branches (each branch representing an environment, e.g. > production, dev, testing etc.) > > When changes to modules/Hiera are made, the changes will be made to a > testing branch, and then merged up the branches until it hits > production (with the appropriate testing of course). So something like > this: > > unstable > dev > testing > production > Do you need a distinction between "unstable" and "dev" ? I've often found that I don't need those to be separate stages. > > What system do you guys use? Any suggestions about the above workflow? > > Thanks! > > Andy > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > > -- Nigel Kersten | http://puppetlabs.com | @nigelkersten Schedule Meetings at: http://tungle.me/nigelkersten -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
