Thanks. I did see those before. At the time of my original question, I
was looking for sets of modules, which do not seem to exist per se. The
urgency has passed, I did it by hand. This however is a terrible way to
think ;) so I am relearning puppet for the next time. I think I get it
now, what I w
distribute2 is the way forward, not pip, I believe.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@goog
Thats good news, then. Great news, in fact!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.
Ah, What I was looking for originally was a higher level of granularity
besides modules.
Classes, in particular seems to be what I was originally seeking.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to pup
So, my configuration attempts are aimed at Linodes .
Ubuntu 10.10 to be exact.
Linodes are libcloud enabled as well as basically provisioned. What I
seek to do is add to that, not build from nothing, since libcloud et.
al. give me a base to work with.
What is the canonical way to manage this
Much appreciated, the good advice. Thanks. That makes total sense,
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+u
I noticed the posts about a ruby DSL, and I was wondering what the
future plan is for this functionality. I _just_ noticed this.
Originally I was drawn to puppet because of the declarative nature of
the DSL and frankly, because I am not that familiar with Ruby.
Are we moving towards ruby as the
That's very good to hear, the DSL was much nicer to work with in this
domain then Ruby was, for the non Ruby user. I was viewing the DSL like
django's template language, or similar, and that helped a great deal.
Thanks for the quick reply.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
Now, I noticed the yumrepo, but this is of little use today, I need to add
an ubuntu ppa ( a few really ) to my installation. How would this be done?
Is there a provider that can do this?
I searched for one, and saw an answer dating from 09, but surely things have
changed since then?
--
You
I think it depends on the use case. I much prefer the git method. I'm
trying to do it the classic way this week, but there is a lot of decisions
to deploy an efficient puppetmaster which add complexity and unwanted
software to some setups.
Git does ssh.
Git is far faster.
Finally, the sour
> It would be non trivial to keep the configuration data isolated in
> masterless mode if you have a desire to segment and isolate
> configuration data by system, or even system roles (i.e. my website
> database system should not contain puppet manifest with my financial
> database password).
>
>
try
puppet resource --types
each type can be enumerated
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr..
Is the puppet dsl a complete Turing capable language?
As I understand it, the chain is dsl -> compiled thing -> actions.
What language is the compiled thing in? Ruby?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, s
This certainly explains a lot. A very good idea, IMO.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@
puppet-module changelog
/opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/puppet-2.6.8/lib/puppet/util/log/destinations.rb:99:
warning: class variable access from toplevel
/opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/puppet-2.6.8/lib/puppet/application/kick.rb:
/opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/puppet-2.6
I shall try this inquiry again:
I installed the puppet module tool version 0.3.3 locally to my laptop.
I have installed ruby 1.9.2 on the laptop. Surely by now, puppet and facter
work with ruby 1.9.2? They certainly seem to work well.
I have installed ruby using macports, and am using the +no
I need some sort of login to post this bug there, one which I do not have.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet
17 matches
Mail list logo
