@Daniel Pittman : don't worry about I will call the "assumption" - in a ml,
one has always to compromise between describe his all situation (hence, 20
pages mail) or do something rather shorter but clearly spotty. Your answers
were quite helpful anyway
@lab42: Your Puppi module sounds quite intere
Maybe I'm going a little nuts, this behaviour seems odd to me (and
inconsistent).
I have a puppet class like this:
class puppet::config {
File {
owner => "puppet",
notify => Service["puppet"],
}
file {
"/etc/puppet/puppet.conf":
content => template("puppet/puppet.conf"),
}
> File {
> owner => "puppet",
> notify => Service["puppetserver"],
> }
> File["/etc/puppet/puppet.conf"] {
> content => template("puppet/puppet.conf","puppetserver/
> puppet.conf"),
> notify +> Service["puppet"],
> mode => 0600,
> }
I disbelieve that's how you are suppose
On Jan 17, 1:12 pm, Felix Frank
wrote:
[snip]
Hi Frank,
> I disbelieve that's how you are supposed to use this plusignment syntax.
> This is how I'm used to seeing it:
>
> class puppet::config {
> file { "foo": notify => Service["bar"] }
>
> }
>
> class puppet::config::server inherits puppet::
On 01/17/2011 02:52 PM, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
> Hi Frank,
"Felix".
> then overridden here:
>
> class puppetserver::config inherits puppet::config{
Oops - sorry, I completely missed that inherits clause in your previous
mail. Also your override syntax. *facepalm*
>> Also note that resource def
I have a problem today.
In my business, i have more than 10 linux servers , each of which runs
a puppet client.
on my puppet master server， sometimes , i need trigger every server to
update from puppet master right now , so i wirte a shell script to
traversal each server to run command "puppet kic
You may want to look at utilizing mCollective to do this as it will provide a
more structured way to handle this task. In this case, 'available' hosts would
be queried and the execution would run on hosts in parallel.
http://www.puppetlabs.com/mcollective/introduction/
Also, Puppet Commander ma
one thing to keep in mind is if the server is the same name previously
there will be an issue where you will need to use the puppetca on the
master to clean out the old cert.
On Jan 14, 3:36 pm, Ohad Levy wrote:
> One way would be to enable autosign when you request your kickstart... if
> you ks
Unfortunately thats a limitation of RPM which has been worked around
with YUM. YUM will do the resolution of dependencies if they are also
in one of the repositories configured on the system.
On Jan 13, 4:09 pm, donavan wrote:
> On Jan 12, 1:45 pm, Stephane wrote:
>
> > You could do something li
Not sure what his issue was but in my organization we had one puppet
master with mod_passenger and puppet 2.6.3 running fine with 200
clients in a VM. We expanded to a 2 node cluster, with the original
puppet master serving as the master for the secondaries. The
secondaries have an F5 infront of th
Matt,
what type of service/health-check do you use in F5?
What's URL (expected-string/HTTP-code) does the loadbalancer check to
determine if puppet is alive?
2011/1/17 Matt
> Not sure what his issue was but in my organization we had one puppet
> master with mod_passenger and puppet 2.6.3 running
Spoke too soon. Problem still exists. Will investigate further.
Any insights on how to control ruby's import order, or how to
further qualify a function like generate might be helpful.
Thanks,
Andree
On 01/16/2011 04:32 PM, Andree Jacobson wrote:
> The issue will probably go away as CentOS get
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 20:00, pl wrote:
>> Puppet::Util::SUIDManager.asuser("username", "group") do
>> # do stuff here as different user
>> end
>
> Not sure this works how you suggested as this
In the current codebase, it will silently ignore the request if you
are either on Windo
I'm trying to get a feel for the actual use cases for the Schedule type in
Puppet.
Anyone care to help me out with some real world examples?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googl
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 18:38, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> I'm trying to get a feel for the actual use cases for the Schedule type in
> Puppet. Anyone care to help me out with some real world examples?
At my previous job we planned to used them to control update periods
for production software: we wo
Hi,
> Can you instrument your code to
> dump Process.uid and Process.gid from Ruby-space in the block? That
> way we can help narrow down where things are going wrong.
Process.uid was telling me 500, which was the intended user. whoami
inside the execpipe was root though.
I've ended up doing th
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 19:26, pl wrote:
>> Can you instrument your code to
>> dump Process.uid and Process.gid from Ruby-space in the block? That
>> way we can help narrow down where things are going wrong.
>
> Process.uid was telling me 500, which was the intended user. whoami
> inside the exe
I have some 'service' definitions in a parameterised class:
class snort($name, $master) {
service{
"snort.$master":
start => "sudo -u snort /home/snort/bin/restart-snort
$sensor" ,
..
}
which get invoked from within a define:
define sensor ( $name, $master, $in
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 07:26:36PM -0800, pl wrote:
> Process.uid was telling me 500, which was the intended user. whoami
> inside the execpipe was root though.
>
> I've ended up doing this
>
> def self.exec_as_user(op, pkg)
>
> Puppet::Util::SUIDManager.asuser("node", "node") do
> s
19 matches
Mail list logo
