> File {
> owner => "puppet",
> notify => Service["puppetserver"],
> }
> File["/etc/puppet/puppet.conf"] {
> content => template("puppet/puppet.conf","puppetserver/
> puppet.conf"),
> notify +> Service["puppet"],
> mode => 0600,
> }
I disbelieve that's how you are supposed to use this plusignment syntax.
This is how I'm used to seeing it:
class puppet::config {
file { "foo": notify => Service["bar"] }
}
class puppet::config::server inherits puppet::config {
File["foo"] { notify +> Service["baz"] }
}
leading to a notify list of Service["bar", "baz"] in the subclass.
Note that you have not used inheritance in your manifest at all!
Also note that resource defaults become mute if you assign *any*
parameter value in an actual instance declaration. So
File { notify => Service["foo"] }
file { "baz": notify +> Service["bar"] }
doesn't mean "enhance the default by Service["bar"]", but instead it
means "replace the default by whatever was set *for this very file* plus
Service["bar"]".
As an aside, I try and steer clear of plusignment whenever it's possible.
Cheers,
Felix
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
