Hi
> but attempting to jerry-rig the same behavior by reading in an
> arbitrary file on the puppetmaster system will not work (without my
> kluge approach). So, I guess barring a change in puppet to only fetch
> function results when that resource is actually to be created (versus
> when
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 07:58, Andrew Shafer wrote:
>
> What version of Puppet are you running?
0.24.4 -- it's the one that's in the Ubuntu Hardy repository. I could
upgrade, but I would prefer to avoid the effort of setting up
appropriate repositories if I can.
> The goal is to be able to set
Brent Chapman wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Trevor Vaughan wrote:
>
>> While this is kind of kludg-y, might you try building the multipart
>> file with Puppet itself:
>>
>> http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/Recipes/BuildingMultipartFiles
>>
>> It's useful for building files w
As Teyo will be in Leuven (Belgium) next week for the training , some
folks had the idea to meetup after the training for a Puppet Users
Meetup.
So the plan is to meet for Drinks and Puppettalk, next week wednesday as
of 20u00 in the Domus in Leuven
http://www.domusleuven.be/
I hope to mee
James Turnbull wrote:
> A new Facter release candidate is available - 1.5.5rc2.
The tarball is missing install.rb.
--
ToddOpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~
Truth is like a well-known whore. E
Brent,
Thanks for the feedback.
It felt like a bit of a hack when I wrote it but it very much follows
the Puppet mentality of idempotency.
I'm just starting to fiddle with Augeas since 90% of my problems fall
into the precise declaration arena.
Trevor
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 17:16, Brent Chap
I'm running into some problems with the iptables module. Or with puppet
itself, I'm not really sure.
I'm running puppet version 0.24.8-1 on ubuntu using the debian
packages. Both on the master and the clients.
I'm using the iptables module from
http://github.com/camptocamp/puppet-iptables/tree/m
As Teyo will be in Leuven (Belgium) next week for the training , some
folks had the idea to meetup after the training for a Puppet Users
Meetup.
So the plan is to meet for Drinks and Puppettalk, next week wednesday as
of 20u00 in the Domus in Leuven
http://www.domusleuven.be/
I hope to meet
I wrote:
> The tarball is missing install.rb.
The documentation and spec dirs are missing as well¹, just in case
those were unintentional.
I don't suppose creating a distcheck like target is easily done using
the ruby tools, as it is with automake, is it? ;)
Conversely, would using autotools be
I've been tasked with revamping our existing puppet configs, to make
them more manageable/extensible/etc. We have four(ish) groups of
machines, that all need similar configs, with slight tweaks - depending
on which network they're on, etc. Currently, we have a very "deep"
inheritance tree, such t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Todd Zullinger wrote:
> I wrote:
>> The tarball is missing install.rb.
>
> The documentation and spec dirs are missing as well¹, just in case
> those were unintentional.
>
Todd
Thanks for this - I rewrote the Rakefile tasks for the build and
suspe
>
> Thanks for this - I rewrote the Rakefile tasks for the build and
> suspected their might be teething problems.
>
> The install.rb is an oversight that I'll fix. The documentation and
> spec directories I deliberately excluded. The former because I didn't
> think anyone still used it - happy
Hi,
We're doing a disaster recovery exercise and one server is giving us
fits. It logs into the puppetmaster and exchanges keys then throws the
following error:
err: Could not retrieve configuration: Uncaught exception no such file
to load - inifile in method puppetmaster.getconfig
Any thoughts
Okay, that was a fairly general question, this is more specific. While
prototyping each of these approaches, I've come across an oddity. I'm
trying to use a selector to determine which cluster I'm running on, and
chose the file path based on that (again, not for production, just to
make sure thi
Have you tried putting quotes around "dev.mycompany.com" ?
On May 19, 2009, at 11:57 AM, David Bishop wrote:
>
> Okay, that was a fairly general question, this is more specific.
> While
> prototyping each of these approaches, I've come across an oddity. I'm
> trying to use a selector to dete
About 5 seconds after hitting send, yes...
Oh, and it worked, in case anybody reading this in the future would like
to learn from my mistakes.
David
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:02:49PM -0700, Jason Rojas wrote:
>
> Have you tried putting quotes around "dev.mycompany.com" ?
>
> On May 19, 2009,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all
Just to let you know about a panel on Open Source Configuration
Management at OpenSourceBridge (http://opensourcebridge.org/) in
Portland, Oregon on June 18th, 2009.
The theme is:
Configuration management tools are finally coming into their
I'm trying to write a custom type for puppet that manages iptables
(I'm leaving the details of *how* I'm managing the iptables config out
of this for now). I think I have everything I basically need to
implement this except for how to handle the "notify" metaparameter. I
want iptables to restart
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 14:41 -0400, Rob McBroom wrote:
> However, what seems like a majority of files are broken up into an
> "array" of values. Take the `/etc/exports` [example from the wiki][1].
> Existing items are assigned numbers 1-4 by Augeas when the file is
> loaded.
> If you add a
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 14:41 -0400, Rob McBroom wrote:
> However, what seems like a majority of files are broken up into an
> "array" of values. Take the `/etc/exports` [example from the wiki][1].
> Existing items are assigned numbers 1-4 by Augeas when the file is
> loaded.
I should have lo
Hi all, I am creating a recipe for rhel boxes which needs to
determine what type of install is present (server or client). I
thought I would use the facter fact lsbdistid for this purpose but
when I run "facter lsbdistid" from the command line nothing is
returned. If I just run facter and grep
is the redhat-lsb rpm installed?
On May 19, 2009, at 1:48 PM, kymas wrote:
>
> Hi all, I am creating a recipe for rhel boxes which needs to
> determine what type of install is present (server or client). I
> thought I would use the facter fact lsbdistid for this purpose but
> when I run "facte
Yes, redhat-lsb-3.1-12.3.EL is installed.
On May 19, 3:55 pm, Jason Rojas wrote:
> is the redhat-lsb rpm installed?
>
> On May 19, 2009, at 1:48 PM, kymas wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi all, I am creating a recipe for rhel boxes which needs to
> > determine what type of install is present (server or clien
This is a known issue with Facter 1.5.x. Not all facts return when
run using:
# facter factname
The fact is still available when you run facter without the name of
the fact.
If you want to use the value of a fact in another fact then there are
a number of examples in the facter code.
Re
Ok, thanks for the information.
On May 19, 4:05 pm, James Turnbull wrote:
> This is a known issue with Facter 1.5.x. Not all facts return when
> run using:
>
> # facter factname
>
> The fact is still available when you run facter without the name of
> the fact.
>
> If you want to use the va
2009/5/19 James Turnbull :
>
> This is a known issue with Facter 1.5.x. Not all facts return when
> run using:
>
> # facter factname
>
We will address the root cause for 1.6.x and 2.0, the changes are just
too invasive for 1.5.x
Paul
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You re
On 2009-May-19, at 11:45 AM, David Bishop wrote:
> This is... unwieldy. To put it mildly. Among other things, we
> were duplicating anything that should be applied to all webservers
> (for
> example), as there is no class that all webservers belong to.
You could assign an arbitrary number of
Having a problem with cert negotiation between client and server.
client:
CentOS 4.4
2.6.9 kernel
ruby 1.8.1-7
puppet 0.24.8
Server:
Debian 4
2.6.9 kernel
ruby 1.8.7
0.24.8-1
Client:
Launch puppetd with -w30
Server:
puppetca --list shows client server. I puppetca --sign it.
Then on the clien
James Turnbull wrote:
> Thanks for this - I rewrote the Rakefile tasks for the build and
> suspected their might be teething problems.
:)
Is the new Rakefile still the same as the patch you sent in
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev/msg/0d0bb27389321fa8 ?
I applied that to test and notice
I am struggling with a multiple operating system Puppet setup. My
Ubuntu client complains that "Configuration could not be instantiated"
and the warning message references a module that is for OpenSolaris
clients only (blastwave).
Please help me if you can. I have been spinning my wheels for ho
30 matches
Mail list logo
