Yes, but
And the but is that it can dramatically reduce your execution path.
You don't *have* to use them.
Trevor
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Larry Ludwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> It might even evoluate in a full-fledged if 'expression' (ie combination
>> of ==,!=, and/or...
2008/9/12 Mike Pountney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> Excellent! Unfortunately, I'm not that au-fait with places to go in London
> - I'll be travelling down from Brighton - but I'm sure there are folk on the
> list that are...
>
> So, anyone got any good suggestions for places to go around here?
>
> h
I should have mentioned, I'm running four mongrel instances fronted by
Apache/2.2.8 on the puppetmaster server for serving the clients.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post
Hello, I have 680 hosts reporting into a central puppet server.
Yesterday I made a change to site.pp and the nodes/foo.pp and nodes/
bar.pp files to push out some new files (a script to enable LDAP) and
it seems that only a handful of stores have downloaded the file and
run the script.
(I don't h
Is there a way to get the service type to only trigger if it is
notified or is a file it is subscribed to changes? In a related issue
what is the syntax for using notify across modules?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to t
I would do something like an ssh for loop that looked for the log
entries from the clients to see what they're doing:
for i in $NODES
ssh $i grep puppetd /var/log/messages
etc
On Sep 17, 9:48 am, josh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I should have mentioned, I'm running four mongrel instances fronte
As understand puppet I should not be able to have two service[named]
entries in the same compiled manifest. To me this means the following
should not work:
In module named/manifest/init.pp I have:
class named{
package{"bind":
ensure => present,
}
service{"n
With almost 700 nodes this isn't an option. The whole point of
installing puppet in the first place was to not have to do this.
And like I said, if I run puppetd manually on each box it gets the
files, runs the scripts, etc. etc.
Also due to inconsistencies in the syslog config on these boxes,
Can puppet actually call modules form inside other modules? I thought
that it could, put after more looking and working it seems that the
rpbolems I have been running to may in fact be caused by puppet _not_
being able to call modules from inside a module.
Evan
--~--~-~--~~--
You'll definitely be wanting to setup reporting, even just the log
type to get your clients puppet logs back on the master.
On 18/09/2008, at 7:31 AM, josh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> With almost 700 nodes this isn't an option. The whole point of
> installing puppet in the first place was
I have that setup now, I have a class for puppet.conf and a command to
restart it, but it isn't getting pushed out automatically. I also
just discovered a misconfiguration in a critical system config file,
and since puppet isn't doing it's job, I may have to ssh into each box
manually and fix it.
Does it appear that puppet is doing other things? Because I suspect it
isn't doing anything.
The mystery is to figure out why your puppet clients aren't
running/retrieving their catalogs.
If you don't have logging or reports, fix that so you can start to get
insight into what is actually happeni
With 700 hosts you should be centralizing your syslog. From that you
can send the puppetd data to a central server and see your output.
-L
--
Larry Ludwig
Empowering Media
1-866-792-0489 x600
Managed Xen based VPSes
http://www.hostcube.com/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~---
Hi there,
I've been working on a very simple puppet configuration to determine
whether it could be used in our office, and am attempting to work within
the best practices guide but have run into immediate difficulty.
The error I have looks like this:
$ puppetmasterd --verbose
info: Starting se
Hi, I'm trying to manage war files on several tomcat servers. Here is
what I'm trying to do:
I have a source directory with war files that I want to sync to the
nodes. The nodes mount this directory via nfs.
When a change is detected I want to copy the war files from the nfs
share to /webapps, st
Lets say that one defines a group resource sans the ensure=>"present"
statement, and also neglects to put any require=>Group["foo"] statements
into any other resources. Will this resource have any effect?
-Patrick
P.S.
I realize now after typing up the question that the issue probably
applies
On Sep 17, 2008, at 7:26 PM, Patrick Rutkowski wrote:
>
> Lets say that one defines a group resource sans the ensure=>"present"
> statement, and also neglects to put any require=>Group["foo"]
> statements
> into any other resources. Will this resource have any effect?
>
> -Patrick
>
> P.S.
> I
What behavior are you getting?
The recurse => 1 means it should only get the first level of that directory,
I think you want recurse => true.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 5:02 PM, pfleming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, I'm trying to manage war files on several tomcat servers. Here is
> what I'm
to answer my own question, just put myclass.rb under /var/lib/puppet/
lib instead of /var/lib/puppet/lib/pupet/parser/functions
On Sep 16, 3:33 pm, barrowkwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have created a custom function, my_test.rb ( it is under /var/lib/
> puppet/lib/puppet/parser/functions i
19 matches
Mail list logo
