Re: [Puppet Users] Combining our experience into a larger, common module repo

2010-02-14 Thread Telmo X
I think that RedHat + Solaris would be a better base to start, since they are the most common *nix flavors on most companies. Maybe going a bit further and adding OSX to the mix to give everyone some guidelines on how to write the modules for the 3 major *nix based Operative Systems out there. Tel

Re: [Puppet Users] Combining our experience into a larger, common module repo

2010-02-04 Thread Michael DeHaan
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 5:52 AM, wrote: > On 3 February 2010 21:04, Julian Simpson wrote: Can we start by grafting together everyone's modules and trying to namespace them? >> >> Has there been any discussion of bundling some common modules in the >> puppet distribution?  It might

Re: [Puppet Users] Combining our experience into a larger, common module repo

2010-02-03 Thread james
On 3 February 2010 21:04, Julian Simpson wrote: Can we start by grafting together everyone's modules and trying to namespace them? Has there been any discussion of bundling some common modules in the puppet distribution?  It might help people get up to speed faster. I don't think we'd want

Re: [Puppet Users] Combining our experience into a larger, common module repo

2010-02-03 Thread Julian Simpson
>> Can we start by grafting together everyone's modules and trying to >> namespace them? Has there been any discussion of bundling some common modules in the puppet distribution? It might help people get up to speed faster. -- Julian Simpson Software Build and Deployment http://www.build-doctor

Re: [Puppet Users] Combining our experience into a larger, common module repo

2010-02-02 Thread James Turnbull
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 3/02/10 9:55 AM, Michael DeHaan wrote: > Can we start by grafting together everyone's modules and trying to > namespace them? Sounds good. Puppet module collection owners? Alessandro? David? Others? > Git subtree merge preserves attribution ni

Re: [Puppet Users] Combining our experience into a larger, common module repo

2010-02-02 Thread Michael DeHaan
James Turnbull wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 3/02/10 3:27 AM, Michael DeHaan wrote: Hi List! So I was talking with several folks on IRC this morning, and we came up with an idea. One of the strengths of Puppet is it has a very large community with tons of syste

Re: [Puppet Users] Combining our experience into a larger, common module repo

2010-02-02 Thread Julian Simpson
> I'd love to see this get off the ground.  There have been a couple > of attempts at it - and you can see some background at: +1. I'd love to see better platform support for the modules that we have. J. -- Julian Simpson Software Build and Deployment http://www.build-doctor.com http://twitter

Re: [Puppet Users] Combining our experience into a larger, common module repo

2010-02-02 Thread James Turnbull
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 3/02/10 3:27 AM, Michael DeHaan wrote: > Hi List! > > So I was talking with several folks on IRC this morning, and we came up > with an idea. > > One of the strengths of Puppet is it has a very large community with > tons of systems administrati

[Puppet Users] Combining our experience into a larger, common module repo

2010-02-02 Thread Michael DeHaan
Hi List! So I was talking with several folks on IRC this morning, and we came up with an idea. One of the strengths of Puppet is it has a very large community with tons of systems administration experience.This is huge. I'd like to unite that experience more closely, so that this power