On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 01:34, Spenser Gilliland wrote:
>
>> That's still ugly but I see how it works. I think I'll give it a shot
>> that way see how it goes
>>
>> I still need to do something to make sure that the class is
>> instantiate
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 01:34, Spenser Gilliland wrote:
> That's still ugly but I see how it works. I think I'll give it a shot
> that way see how it goes
>
> I still need to do something to make sure that the class is
> instantiated after the tables are instantited.
>
> Run stages maybe? Uhh, s
That's still ugly but I see how it works. I think I'll give it a shot
that way see how it goes
I still need to do something to make sure that the class is
instantiated after the tables are instantited.
Run stages maybe? Uhh, still ugly. I wish there was just some kind of
syntactical element for
On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 04:40 -0600, Spenser Gilliland wrote:
> Matthew,
>
> I'm a bit confused on your code, how does an instance get added to the db?
Yeah, that's probably my fault... :D
My thought was that if you have a known path to the redmine instances
you could create a ruby class which it
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Spenser Gilliland wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 4:14 AM, Matthew Macdonald-Wallace
> wrote:
>> On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 01:51 -0600, Spenser Gilliland wrote:
>>> Yeap, I'm seeing that it doesn't exist yet either. I'm thinking maybe
>>> I can use exported resource
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 4:14 AM, Matthew Macdonald-Wallace
wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 01:51 -0600, Spenser Gilliland wrote:
>> Yeap, I'm seeing that it doesn't exist yet either. I'm thinking maybe
>> I can use exported resources or maybe just an exec that increments a
>> counter on the host.
On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 01:51 -0600, Spenser Gilliland wrote:
> Yeap, I'm seeing that it doesn't exist yet either. I'm thinking maybe
> I can use exported resources or maybe just an exec that increments a
> counter on the host. Either way it's not very pretty. My use case is
> as follows:
>
> In
Spenser Gilliland wrote:
> Yeap, I'm seeing that it doesn't exist yet either. I'm thinking maybe
> I can use exported resources or maybe just an exec that increments a
> counter on the host. Either way it's not very pretty. My use case is
> as follows:
>
> In Debian, Redmine has the option of
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 08:24, Spenser Gilliland wrote:
>
>> I've come into a use case where I need a list of all the instances of
>> a definition. I'd like the syntax to be
>
> [...]
>
>> I'm not sure if this will work as anticipated. I
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 08:24, Spenser Gilliland wrote:
> I've come into a use case where I need a list of all the instances of
> a definition. I'd like the syntax to be
[...]
> I'm not sure if this will work as anticipated. I believe that this
> will only update $instance in the test::instan
I've come into a use case where I need a list of all the instances of
a definition. I'd like the syntax to be
class test {
$instances = []
}
define test::instance() {
$instance += ["$name"]
}
I'm not sure if this will work as anticipated. I believe that this
will only update $instance i
11 matches
Mail list logo
