On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Daniel Pittman <dan...@rimspace.net> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 01:34, Spenser Gilliland <spenser...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> That's still ugly but I see how it works. I think I'll give it a shot >> that way see how it goes >> >> I still need to do something to make sure that the class is >> instantiated after the tables are instantited. >> >> Run stages maybe? Uhh, still ugly. I wish there was just some kind of >> syntactical element for this. > > For that, file a feature request bug report. :) FWIW, I think this > overlaps with a similar problem that I faced, and which we used the > 'concat' system to work around. Having a standard puppet solution > would be good. > > Regards, > Daniel > -- > ✣ Daniel Pittman ✉ dan...@rimspace.net ☎ +61 401 155 707 > ♽ made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > >
I added feature #5416 for this. I suggested two possible syntax styles. If anyone can think of any others I think we should add them to the bug. Spenser -- Spenser Gilliland Computer Engineer Illinois Institute of Technology -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
