On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 01:34, Spenser Gilliland <spenser...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That's still ugly but I see how it works. I think I'll give it a shot
> that way see how it goes
>
> I still need to do something to make sure that the class is
> instantiated after the tables are instantited.
>
> Run stages maybe? Uhh, still ugly. I wish there was just some kind of
> syntactical element for this.
For that, file a feature request bug report. :) FWIW, I think this
overlaps with a similar problem that I faced, and which we used the
'concat' system to work around. Having a standard puppet solution
would be good.
Regards,
Daniel
--
✣ Daniel Pittman ✉ dan...@rimspace.net ☎ +61 401 155 707
♽ made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
