On Jul 1, 2009, at 9:30 AM, Pete Emerson wrote:
> I have a bunch of CentOS machines. In the process of puppetizing one
> of them I'm getting this warning (more complete debug info at the
> end):
>
> warning: Found multiple default providers for service: init, base;
> using init
> info: /Ser
On Jul 10, 2009, at 1:15 PM, jcbollinger wrote:
>
> I have been working on a custom provider for User resources, relying
> in part on the documentation on the Wiki:
>
> http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/CompleteResourceExample
> http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/ProviderDevelopmen
As I mentioned in another thread, I am working on a custom provider
for the User resource. After having worked out that I needed a delete
() method rather than a destroy() method, nearly everything is
working:
Removing a User with ensure => 'absent',
Updating an existing user via all property bi
Dear Puppeteers,
I'm in desperate need of help. Here's the story:
When I boot up new machines, they have a default puppet.conf which
causes them to talk to our production puppetmaster at
puppet.digg.internal. Some of these machines are destined for our
development environment, and there is a cus
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:47 PM, jcbollinger wrote:
>
>
> Nigel Kersten wrote:
>> Is your :parent => Puppet::Provider::NameService::ObjectAdd ?
>
> No, I have not specified an explicit parent, so I get Puppet::Provider
> as the superclass (which I confirmed by adding a "puts
> self.superclass" to
Nigel Kersten wrote:
> Is your :parent => Puppet::Provider::NameService::ObjectAdd ?
No, I have not specified an explicit parent, so I get Puppet::Provider
as the superclass (which I confirmed by adding a "puts
self.superclass" to the end of the class definition and observing the
output). It su
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 1:15 PM, jcbollinger wrote:
>
> I have been working on a custom provider for User resources, relying
> in part on the documentation on the Wiki:
>
> http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/CompleteResourceExample
> http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/ProviderDevelop
I have been working on a custom provider for User resources, relying
in part on the documentation on the Wiki:
http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/CompleteResourceExample
http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/ProviderDevelopment
Somewhat to my surprise, my provider is generally working
Peter Meier wrote:
> as in earlier days you can't be sure that every init script had a
> status option, init.d didn't use it in earlier versions. Afair this
> have been changed in the latest version (0.24.8), at least there have
> been a discussion about that on the dev list.
>
> however you can
Couple of minor revisions.
1) Thank you Ohad Levy for the original cgi script. Sorry about not
giving you credit.
2) if [ '$NVRAM' == 'no' ]; then
should be
if [ "$NVRAM" == 'no' ]; then
---
Thanks,
Allan Marcus
505-667-5666
On Jul 9, 2009, at 7:12 PM, Allan Marcus wrote:
>
> Putting it
Hi
> My guess is that I'm not doing something quite right in my init.d script as
> I have other custom services that are working just fine, but since I cloned
> this one from a working one, it's baffling me. How does puppet check whether
> a service is running or not for an init service?
as in
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Pete Emerson wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out how "ensure => running" determines whether a
> service is running or not (CentOS using init controlled services).
>
> I have a custom service that has enable => running set on it:
>
> service { "foo":
> ensure =>
I'm trying to figure out how "ensure => running" determines whether a
service is running or not (CentOS using init controlled services).
I have a custom service that has enable => running set on it:
service { "foo":
ensure => running,
enable => true
}
Every time puppet runs I see this:
Thank you for your suggestion.
No, I haven't tried. I also haven't trying banging on my keyboard
until I produce Shakespeare. I was hoping to get an informed answer
from the knowledgeable people on this list before I wasted my time.
Also, trial and error will not let me know if there are an
Absolutely. Here is my startup script that sets the hostname of the computer
each time it starts up:
scutil --set HostName `system_profiler SPHardwareDataType | grep "Serial
Number:" | cut -d':' -f2 | tr "[:upper:]" "[:lower:]"`
scutil --set ComputerName `system_profiler SPHardwareDataType | grep
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Kurt Engle wrote:
> This is fantastic. I think something like this will be very useful in
> managing a large number of Macintosh clients. It is certainly the help and
> outcome that I was looking for when I started this thread. A big "Thank You"
> to Allan and ever
This is fantastic. I think something like this will be very useful in
managing a large number of Macintosh clients. It is certainly the help and
outcome that I was looking for when I started this thread. A big "Thank You"
to Allan and everyone else that contributed.
I took a little different but s
Hi All,
I was surprised to notice that a call to noop from puppetrun did not work as
expected.
on the agent side (for this case the server side..), I ran:
puppetd --verbose --no-daemonize (where listen is set in the puppet.conf)
on the puppet server side(in this case the client side), I ran:
Hi
>> if you don't want to write an own parsed file provider which can edit
>> parts of a certain file (like the one of the nagios resources) and/or do
>> it with augeas, then yes.
>
> We don't have augeus conveniently at hand (and it doesn't have a
> lens anyhow);
> building a parsed file prov
Hi,
Can someone please explain how the certificate authentication works for
puppetrun? Or point me to a document.
thanks,
Dan
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this gr
Paul Gear wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to create a squid url_regex ACL source file for various
> different sites. Each site needs a slightly different configuration, so
> my plan was to create the a bunch of files on the server, then drag them
> down and concatenate them into a single file on the
Daniel Pittman wrote:
> G'day.
>
> I am wondering what the current best practice for building a single file out
> of distributed fragments is with puppet. Specifically, my problem:
>
> 1. Install munin-node on arbitrary machines.
> 2. Install 'munin.conf' as a single file on one machine, contai
Peter Meier writes:
>> Is this really still the best method for achieving this?
>
> if you don't want to write an own parsed file provider which can edit
> parts of a certain file (like the one of the nagios resources) and/or do
> it with augeas, then yes.
We don't have augeus conveniently at h
Hi
> Is this really still the best method for achieving this?
if you don't want to write an own parsed file provider which can edit
parts of a certain file (like the one of the nagios resources) and/or do
it with augeas, then yes.
> Is it possible for me to access the storeconfig database from
Daniel Pittman writes:
> I am wondering what the current best practice for building a single file out
> of distributed fragments is with puppet.
[...]
> 2. On the munin central host, collect the exported file objects, creating them
>on disk in a random directory.
>
> 3. On the munin centra
25 matches
Mail list logo
