Valid point, unfortunately, i configured this:
r...@puppetsun:/opt/csw/bin# cat /opt/csw/etc/puppet/puppet.conf
[main]
vardir = /var/lib/puppet
logdir = /var/log/puppet
rundir = /var/run/puppet
ssldir = $vardir/ssl
pluginsync = true
factpath = $vardi
note that SSLCARevocationFile doesnt work, you would not be able to use your
puppetd aginst your puppetmaster (if its the same machine).
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Arnau Bria wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> following http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/UsingMongrel it
> says that hostkey/ce
If you used the Solaris blastwave packages, it might be that your certs are
in a different directory... check your puppet configs for where your ssl
dir is (could be /etc/puppet/ssl, /var/lib/puppet/ssl,
/opt/csw/etc/puppet/ssl .)
Cheers,
Ohad
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 6:29 AM, chakkerz wrote
Hello,
Any Puppet users located in Portland, OR interested in forming a local
Puppet users group? I am in the process of relocating to Portland and would
love to help build a strong local community. I'll be in Portland until
March 8th and would love to have a meet up in the next few weeks.
Chee
Hello,
Am 10.02.2009 um 00:34 schrieb Eric Gerlach:
> If I want to configure a file, say /etc/network interfaces, on all
> of my Debian boxes, should I put the resource definition in:
>
> a) manifests/classes/debian.pp
> b) modules/debian/manifests/init.pp
>
> I guess I'm asking whether people
Sorry $operatingsystem not $lsbdistid for the variable.
-L
On Feb 9, 6:54 pm, Larry Ludwig wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> I tend to think of modules as a method to encapsulate a package or
> even larger service. If you needed to develop for a specific OS you
> could break down into seperate classes.
>
Hi Eric,
I tend to think of modules as a method to encapsulate a package or
even larger service. If you needed to develop for a specific OS you
could break down into seperate classes.
If you created a module named "network" it could be more generic and
apply to other OSes.
ie:
class network {
On 2/9/2009 5:34 PM, Eric Gerlach wrote:
> If I want to configure a file, say /etc/network interfaces, on all of
> my Debian boxes, should I put the resource definition in:
>
> a) manifests/classes/debian.pp
> b) modules/debian/manifests/init.pp
>
> I guess I'm asking whether people here have c
Hi,
I'm slowly building Puppet into our infrastructure, and it's quite fun. I have
a question about best practices though.
If I want to configure a file, say /etc/network interfaces, on all of my Debian
boxes, should I put the resource definition in:
a) manifests/classes/debian.pp
b) modules/
bump... ideas?
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Scott Beardsley
wrote:
>>> [4] https://git.puppet.immerda.ch/?p=module-shorewall;a=summary
>>
>> as I'm involved in 1,2 and 4 I try to answer:
>> 1 and 4 should be nearly identical, 1 is more or less just a mirror of 4.
>> However 4 is the one which
Hi Steven,
I ran into the same problem this morning when rolling some new facter/
puppet packages for RHEL4. Going back to facter 1.5.2 seems to be a
usable workaround at the moment.
-ryan
On Feb 5, 10:48 am, "Steven Nemetz" wrote:
> > On Feb 4, 2009, at 6:49 PM, Steven Nemetz wrote:
>
> > >
Ok, i've re-read
http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/CertificatesAndSecurity
and some things fell into place (though it still doesn't work :) )
So the CA here is my host puppetbeta which is the master. On it i
signed the cert that the puppetsun generated when i ran `puppetd --
test` , usin
But that doesn't make sense ...
So what you're saying that the Solaris host (all the RedHat ones are
working), will need to have their cert's generated on a RedHat box,
and then transferred to the solaris host?
But even then the architecture doesn't make sense, because i'm using a
self signed ce
On Feb 9, 1:31 pm, Paul Lathrop wrote:
> Are you using stored configs?
>
Also what version of the puppetmaster?
-L
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send
Are you using stored configs?
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Arnau Bria wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> anyone could explain why every time that puppet compiles a catalog for a
> host, its compilation time increases?
>
> Hosts share same "type", so, from my understanding, compiling catalog
> time should dec
On 2/9/2009 11:05 AM, s...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
> Hi
> I am running Debian 4.0.
> I have updated my system from v 0.20.
>
> Updated Ruby then checked libraries openssl, xmlrpc -all OK
> but ruby --vesion gives 1.8.5 not 1.8.7 which I was expecting!
Here's relevant output from my working puppetm
> -Original Message-
>
> What about if you run Facter with --puppet, making sure it loads your
> custom facts?
>
> --
> Due to circumstances beyond your control, you are master of your fate
> and captain of your soul.
> --
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:24 AM, nicolas wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Maybe there is something I missed about definitions. I though it was
>> a notion related to the notion of a class.
>> I'm confused too, because your answer make me think that you
>> consider definition call like resources. Is it the cas
Hello,
So far, the response to the survey has been outstanding. Thanks for taking
the time to complete the survey. For those of you that have not yet taken
the survey, we will be closing it at 24:00 CST, February 13th, 2009. This
is an opportunity for you to let us know what you think about Pup
>
> Maybe there is something I missed about definitions. I though it was
> a notion related to the notion of a class.
> I'm confused too, because your answer make me think that you
> consider definition call like resources. Is it the case ?
>
> My only request was to be able to put paramete
Hi
I am running Debian 4.0.
I have updated my system from v 0.20.
Updated Ruby then checked libraries openssl, xmlrpc -all OK
but ruby --vesion gives 1.8.5 not 1.8.7 which I was expecting!
Did the LDAP validation as per the wiki -all OK
Installed puppet v 0.27.7
Puppermaster wouldn't start.
> The payload for the configuration stage is the result of compilation,
> and is data-only (no variables, no functions, etc.).
I c. So it would be somewhat pointless extending an existing OMA-DM
solutions to support Puppet clients. The OMA-DM transfers the device
settings in a standardized xml tre
Hi all,
following http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/UsingMongrel it
says that hostkey/cert must be owned by puppet:puppet.
I tried to keep original path (and also owner) of both files and seems
to puppet still works...
what problems could it cause to my conf?
# grep lib mongrel.conf
S
> >>> About the external nodes, why doesn't it possible to use
> >>> definition ?
> >>> I use definition to create an instance of tomcat for exemple. So I'd
> >>> like to be able to create a node with 2 or more instances.
> >>> Why there is this limitation ?
>
> >> You can use definitions, you
On Feb 6, 2009, at 5:28 PM, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
>
> Darned thing is suddenly failing. We had a reboot last night, and I
> changed a couple of files today too, so either one could somehow be
> responsible. But I can't figure out how from this crash. First I
> noticed
> that my changes we
On Feb 6, 2009, at 10:45 AM, macbrass wrote:
>
> I'm having the exact same problem getting the initial puppet install
> going on a Mac. I've tried installing it from the packages on Nigel's
> site as well as with Ruby Gems, both times on a completely clean
> system using the latest build (0.24.7
On Feb 6, 2009, at 2:51 AM, Tom D. Davidson wrote:
>
>>> what is the format of the xml payload?
>>
>> Currently xmlrpc over https, and the payload varies but is usually
>> just serialized ruby objects.
> ok, right. with Puppet there is not device management tree because the
> device is abstracted
On Feb 5, 2009, at 8:14 PM, Daniel Pittman wrote:
>
> G'day.
>
> We are currently looking to integrate etckeeper[1] into our puppet
> managed hosts, especially the legacy hosts that are still partially
> under manual control.
>
> etckeeper is, essentially, a wrapper around a VCS for /etc, trackin
On Feb 5, 2009, at 11:48 AM, Steven Nemetz wrote:
>>>
>>> Anyone have any ideas what could have happened to these 4 systems?
>>
>> Might you have a fact that's broken, or something similar? That's
>> been the cause of 99% of the startup hangs I've seen.
>>
>> --
>> It isn't necessary to have rela
On Feb 6, 2009, at 2:04 AM, nicolas wrote:
>
> On Feb 5, 7:27 pm, Luke Kanies wrote:
>> On Feb 5, 2009, at 10:36 AM, Benoit Decherf wrote:
>>
>>> Ok.
>>
>>> About the external nodes, why doesn't it possible to use
>>> definition ?
>>> I use definition to create an instance of tomcat for exemple
On Feb 9, 2009, at 8:36 AM, paul matthews wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is fairly off-topic as I'm sure its more to do with general
> ruby installation but has anyone had any success with ruby, puppet
> and facter installs on hpux (either 11.2x or 11.3x)
> I have ruby 1.84 running but that's about th
Hi,
This is fairly off-topic as I'm sure its more to do with general ruby
installation but has anyone had any success with ruby, puppet and facter
installs on hpux (either 11.2x or 11.3x)
I have ruby 1.84 running but that's about the only success so far
An attempt to install facter returns:-
rub
On Feb 8, 10:19 am, Mike Renfro wrote:
> I found I needed a custom repository for local packages pretty early on
> -- things not included in stock Debian/Ubuntu installs. Newer puppet
> packages went there.
>
> Repository setup for ftp
> server:http://blogs.cae.tntech.edu/mwr/2007/05/28/my-own-
Hi,
anyone could explain why every time that puppet compiles a catalog for a
host, its compilation time increases?
Hosts share same "type", so, from my understanding, compiling catalog
time should decrease... (ok, from my poor understanding).
Feb 9 11:33:26 gridinstall puppetmasterd[356]: Com
I found this almost completely by accident:
<0> sa_de...@engpsr.etf.barcapetf.com (0 jobs)
/var/satellite/redhat/NULL/puppet-server/0.24.6-3.el5/noarch
% l
total 36K
drwxr-xr-x 2 apache root 4.0K Feb 5 01:55 ./
drwxr-xr-x 3 apache root 4.0K Feb 5 01:55 ../
-rw-r- 1 apache root 26K
35 matches
Mail list logo
