Re: [psyche] Re: Red Hat 9

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 30 March 2003 02:03 am, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > At 07:33 PM 3/29/2003 -0500, you wrote: > >On Saturday 29 March 2003 06:55 pm, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > > > At 04:05 PM 3/25/2003 -0900, you wrote: > > > >After 12 months, up2date goes away if

RE: Mozilla 1.3 and Java j2sdk-1.4.1_02-fcs

> -Original Message- > From: Mike Vanecek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sat, March 29, 2003 5:22 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Mozilla 1.3 and Java j2sdk-1.4.1_02-fcs > > > On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 21:34:08 -0500, Michael Fratoni wrote > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >

Re: Red Hat 9 -- April 7th -- Price & Compatibility?

Colburn wrote: OK, RedHat will try to resolve the many flaws in RH8 with their new release, RH9 on April 7th. Any idea what they will charge retail for this? (I also paid for my RH8 release, though considering the hundreds of wasted hours trying to get it to do what it promised to do I feel as t

Re: WineX

Joe Klemmer wrote: On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 19:40, Keith Winston wrote: The way I've been updating my servers lately is with a nice program called yum. Check it out here: http://www.linux.duke.edu/projects/yum/ Hey, that's Seth's util. I have also found current to be a good alternative. I h

Re: RH 9.0 - changelog?

Gordon Messmer wrote: The Pine license doesn't allow anyone to distribute modified packages, which means that Red Hat can't publish a security update until UW does. That's not an acceptable, or Free, license. BTW, while I don't know of a GPL pine clone, there is a very fine GPL pico clone calle

Re: About RH9 "usefulness"

On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 04:45, M. Fioretti wrote: > On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 00:28:52 at 12:28:52AM -0800, Eric Burke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > wrote: > > > > The bottom line is for a corporate desktop, RH no > > longer serves the purpose. Once compatibility is broken by adding > > something no one else is

Re: About RH9 "usefulness"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 30 March 2003 09:13 am, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 00:28:52 at 12:28:52AM -0800, Eric Burke wrote: > > > The bottom line is for a corporate desktop, RH no > > > longer serves the purpose. Once compatibility is broken by

RE: About RH9 "usefulness"

> -Original Message- > From: Michael Fratoni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sun, March 30, 2003 4:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: About RH9 "usefulness" > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sunday 30 March 2003 09:13 am, Arjan van de Ven wrote: >

Re: Red Hat 9 -- April 7th -- Price & Compatibility?

I have placed my order with Amazon in advance. Am on a dial-up out here in the woods (no other options yet). May try a download from work and burn to a CD but want a clean and original CD with docs. If I do the download I may test it as a server load on an old 200MHz box -- to replace the M$ 200

Re: [psyche] Re: Red Hat 9

On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 01:03:41 -0600, you wrote: >"Red Hat will provide errata maintenance for AT LEAST 12 months [... and] >may extend errata maintenance for certain popular releases[.]" > >Yes, up2date MAY go away for your RH release 12 months after it came out, >but there is no certainty that i

Re: SV: Spam ? (RH9)

On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 00:22, Gerald Henriksen wrote: > > Why do you quote my posts and attribute them to others? This is not > >the first one I've seen. Pleas do not do it anymore. > > He doesn't. > > If you care to look at the originating message of this thread you will > see the message

Re: Preference Files In Use (2nd Try)

On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 02:50, Cameron Simpson wrote: > It's probably just Gnome being anal. That's almost a redundant statement. ;-) -- Farewell neighbor. Thank you for giving us a safe place for so many years. Fred Rodgers - 1928-2003 -- Psyche-list mailing list [E

Re: WineX

On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 08:38, Keith Winston wrote: > >>http://www.linux.duke.edu/projects/yum/ > > > > Hey, that's Seth's util. I have also found current to be a good > > alternative. > > I haven't tried current yet because yum has been working so well. I > monitor the yum list and Seth s

RE: About RH9 "usefulness"

On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 10:13, Pavel Rozenboim wrote: > > It's much more fun to read the FUD. After all, there is no > > 8.1 because Red Hat jumped the gun and went right to Red Hat > > Linux 9. That changes everything, Chicken Little. If they had > > just called it Red Hat Linux 8.1, it would have

Re: Lilo and mounted boot partition

On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, MW Mike Weiner (5028) wrote: > Dear list readers - > > I have a question, one which I have never really done or thought of doing > before, though I am sure there is some way to do it. Where I am at is as > follows, I have a server with a "cloned" disk that I have mounted > t

Xnest access

I can launch programs using the main X server just fine. However, I cannot use a second server, such as Xnest. I fire up Xnest like so: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jhereg]# Xnest :1 & [1] 15263 [EMAIL PROTECTED] jhereg]# Could not init font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/, removing from list!

Re: Recovering a Damaged RH 8.0 System

On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Robert Styma wrote: > After recharging the battery, the machine would not > boot. After digging around after booting with the CD, > we found the problem was the soft links in /lib were > corrupted. The link contents were corrupted differently > on each link, but letters were

iscsci daemon and scsi emulation

Hello to everyone in the list. What does the iscsi daemon do? I setup scsi emulation for an atapi cdrw drive so I could burn cdroms. I can still access my cdrw drive and burn cdroms whether or not iscsi is running. What does iscsi do and how is it related to scsi emulation? Thanks, Leo Bou

Re: RH Folks -- A Entitlement Wish

On Sat, 29 Mar 2003 18:09:52 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote > On Saturday 29 March 2003 17:43, Mike Vanecek uttered: > > I have 3 RH 8 systems on paid basic entitlements. That works real nice for > > standard up2date updates. However, sometimes I need something that is not > > provided by up2date. E.g.

Re: RH Folks -- A Entitlement Wish

On Sunday 30 March 2003 09:39, Mike Vanecek uttered: > I tried one and it was busy too. Just gave up and waited a couple of days. > Which one do you recommend? Where are you located? > OTOH, my suggestion would be one more reason for folks to pay their $60 for > a subscription. True. -- Jesse

Re: iscsci daemon and scsi emulation

On Sunday 30 March 2003 09:42, Redhat uttered: > Hello to everyone in the list. > > What does the iscsi daemon do? I setup scsi emulation for an atapi cdrw > drive so I could burn cdroms. I can still access my cdrw drive and burn > cdroms whether or not iscsi is running. > > What does iscsi do

Re: RH Folks -- A Entitlement Wish

On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 11:39:06AM -0600, Mike Vanecek wrote: > On Sat, 29 Mar 2003 18:09:52 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote > > On Saturday 29 March 2003 17:43, Mike Vanecek uttered: > > > I have 3 RH 8 systems on paid basic entitlements. That works real nice for > > > standard up2date updates. However

Re: Red Hat 9

On 29 Mar 2003 22:01:46 -0500, Joe Klemmer wrote > On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 11:53, Guy Fraser wrote: > > > What about the extra US$60/year for the entitlement, US$60/year x 500 = > > US$30,000. For each 500 entitlements, a persons salary can be paid for a > > year. > > You have many other op

RE: Mozilla 1.3 and Java j2sdk-1.4.1_02-fcs

On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 14:16:46 +0200, Pavel Rozenboim wrote > > Did you copy the plugin file to mozilla plugins dir? I think it is important > to create a symbolic link to a plugin and not to copy the file. Also > do you use a plugin from mozilla directory or netscape4 directory? Yes, [EMAIL PR

RE: About RH9 "usefulness"

On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 16:47, Joe Klemmer wrote: > On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 10:13, Pavel Rozenboim wrote: > > > > It's much more fun to read the FUD. After all, there is no > > > 8.1 because Red Hat jumped the gun and went right to Red Hat > > > Linux 9. That changes everything, Chicken Little. If th

A7N266-VM(AA) + RH 8.0 No graphics mode install

Anyone running the A7N277-VM or -VM/AA based on the nVidia 220-D chipset (other similar motherboards may also use this procedure) and wanting to install RH 8.0: The problems encountered are: 1) RH 8.0 Install CD hangs system in graphics install - Use "linux text" mode. 2) Grub does not work on th

Re: Subject: Re: Red Hat 9

On Saturday 29 March 2003 08:02 pm, Joe Klemmer wrote: > On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 18:11, Guy Fraser wrote: > > > I trusted RH not to cause such a huge problem. I personaly do not do the > > upgrades, but it was through my encouragement that RH was installed to > > reduce overhead costs, when ever

Re: RH 9.0 - changelog?

This one time, at band camp, Keith Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gordon Messmer wrote: > > > > The Pine license doesn't allow anyone to distribute modified packages, > > which means that Red Hat can't publish a security update until UW does. > > That's not an acceptable, or Free, licens

unsubscribe

_  IncrediMail - El E-mail ha evolucionado finalmente - Haga clic aquí

Re: [psyche] Re: Red Hat 9

At 02:05 PM 3/29/2003 -0600, you wrote: So, let me re-phrase the question. What significant difference is there (if any) between RH8/9 outfitted compltetly open-source and RH secure server? Is secure server *NOT* open source. Can RH8/9 serve as a secure enterprise server system just as well as s

unsubscribe

  - Original Message - From: Franjo - Integracion y Gestion de Sistemas y Proyectos To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 9:23 PM Subject: unsubscribe

Re: RH 9.0 - changelog?

At 07:44 AM 3/31/2003 +1000, you wrote: Pico is also available without pine If you use pico without pine, does the license change? -- Rodolfo J. Paiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

Re: RH 9.0 - changelog?

On Sunday 30 March 2003 13:44, Kevin Waterson uttered: > Pico is also available without pine But not w/out the UW license. -- Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE http://geek.j2solutions.net Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.org) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating --

Re: Preference Files In Use (2nd Try)

On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 15:01, Ronald W. Heiby wrote: > Since sharing my home directory using NFS / automount, I sometimes > find the following message on the X Window screen before Gnome gets > going. > > "Your preferences files are currently in use. (If you are logged in to > this same account fro

Let's Move RH 9 stuff to redhat-list!

Nuff said. Cheers! -- Richard Potter RHCE Re/Max Kingston, ON CANADA -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

Re: RH 9.0 - changelog?

On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 05:32, Guy Fraser wrote: > Now that pine is gone, there will be no pico. All I am left with is vi. There is a free clone of pico called nano (as in mili -> micro -> pico -> nano) available with recent Red Hat releases or at . You will also find th

RE: Need help...Sybase12.5

So what glibc rpms were installed? You can check with rpm -q --qf "%{name}\t%{arch}\n" glibc There seems to be a issue with the "i386" version of the glibc libraries. Sybase tech support has reproduced the problem internally and has forwarded the issue to engineering. The issue seems to b

Re: RH Folks -- A Entitlement Wish

On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 09:53:40 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote > On Sunday 30 March 2003 09:39, Mike Vanecek uttered: > > I tried one and it was busy too. Just gave up and waited a couple of days. > > Which one do you recommend? > > Where are you located? Most of the time either in Texas or Arkansas.

Re: JFFS2 support in RH 8.0?

On 30 Mar 2003, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 15:15, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > i have an (alleged) JFFS2 format file that i would like > > to mount (via -o loop) and examine on my RH box, so i'm > > trying to build in JFFS2 filesystem support. > > You cannot use '-oloop' beca

RE: Mozilla 1.3 and Java j2sdk-1.4.1_02-fcs

> -Original Message- > From: Mike Vanecek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sun, March 30, 2003 8:01 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Mozilla 1.3 and Java j2sdk-1.4.1_02-fcs > > > On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 14:16:46 +0200, Pavel Rozenboim wrote > > > > > Did you copy the plugin file

Re: find and replace text in files

On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 18:27, Philippe wrote: > Hi, > > Good answer, but if your want to replace all "search" terms in a line > (and not only the first found), just add the "g" parameter at the end of > sed command : (g = globally)... there was an implicit man sed ;-) P. -- Psyche-list mailin