Mozilla 1.3_gtk2 was compiled with gcc 3.2, causing it not to recognize
plugins compiled with previous gcc versions. This includes java plugin (you
can download jre compiled with gcc 3.2 from blackdown.org) and some others.
Pavel.
> -Original Message-
> From: Antonio Montagnani [mailto:[E
With all the problems I've had with Red Hat 8 - particularly on my server
(still not running correctly and updated fully). I've actually considered
regressing to 7.2 on my server.
Sounds like Red Hat is doing a MS-type end around. Abandon the RH 8.x
series and introduce RH 9 because it doesn't h
utorak 25. mart 2003. 12:58, naugaranch:
> With all the problems I've had with Red Hat 8 - particularly on my
> server (still not running correctly and updated fully). I've
> actually considered regressing to 7.2 on my server.
Well, I think that is why Red Hat introduced enterprise line of
oper
naugaranch wrote:
>
> With all the problems I've had with Red Hat 8 - particularly on my server
> (still not running correctly and updated fully). I've actually considered
> regressing to 7.2 on my server.
This is exactly what I'm facing and exactly the decision
I've made. Enigma runs perfectl
Thanks, Jason, for your offer. I'll probably have more questions to you in
the near future.
I'd like also thank those who replied, giving me some idea beforehand.
Vidol
- Original Message -
From: Jason Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 3:14 AM
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 07:29:51AM +0100, Andrew Kelly wrote:
>
>
> Will Mendez wrote:
> >
> > That's pretty impressive what would make them skip a dot release?
>
> The cynical me says it's to force RHCE recertification.
There have already been Red Hat postings about this. Hang on until
after
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Charles Curley wrote:
> > It's definitely a marketing thing. Not only Mdk but Slack is at 9.x
> > and don't forget Solaris is at 9, too.
>
> Well, HP-UX is at, what, 11 or so?
>
> And then, there's Emacs, at 21.2.
>
> If this really is a marketing sthick, that should k
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, naugaranch wrote:
> With all the problems I've had with Red Hat 8 - particularly on my
> server (still not running correctly and updated fully). I've actually
> considered regressing to 7.2 on my server.
I would recommend that, if you are going to fall back to the 7.
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Andrew Kelly wrote:
> It's sad to see how prevalent MSing is becoming in the Linux namespace.
1) There's no evidence of any Linux company doing anything MS-like.
2) Since the marketing powers of MS are unparalleled, it's hard for any
business to not follow some of their "tri
Joe Klemmer wrote:
>
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Andrew Kelly wrote:
>
> > It's sad to see how prevalent MSing is becoming in the Linux namespace.
>
> 1) There's no evidence of any Linux company doing anything MS-like.
It's probably just a function of our differing perspectives
and absolutely not
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Joe Klemmer wrote:
> I doubt that. RH 8 works just fine in most situations. It's not
> quite as solid in some server situations as 7.3 was but that's likely to
> improve with 9.
Hard to find just the right place to interject my $.02
All the discussions/go-rounds
In my part of the world in the southern hemisphere, Linux became
an extremely popular server OS at more or less the same time that
the Red Hat 7.x series was out. For us, this was partly why 7.3
was the most popular, but RH 7.3 also *seemed* to be the most
'hassle free' Linux OS or there compared
Dear Admins
here is my setup
we have 150 machines running on windows2000 Prof in our office. also 50
solaris server running for our developement. all windows machine has
installed humming Bird exceed software to connect solaris desktop. Now we
are planning to go linux instead of windows,to avo
thanks a lot Guy for your reply.
Gilbert
-Original Message-
From: Guy Fraser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 7:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Triple Boot :)
Hi
If you have ME and XP installed and not conflicting you are ready to go.
You can use the pa
In my RH8 I can do this executing gdmchooser
HTH
"Bala murugan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@redhat.com con fecha 25/03/2003
04:17:50 p.m.
Por favor, responda a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado por: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Destinatarios: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC:
Asunto: XDMCP chooser in linux.. as sola
I have an idea...
Why don't we all put our soap boxes back under the desk and get back to administering
our systems... huh???
This thread has gone entirely too long...
R.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 9:15 AM
To:
Hi
I would like to move my /var dir to some free space i have on a drive.
How would i achieve this ?
--
/Marek
/Pawinski.net
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Get real,
Complaining about a free operating system pulling a M$ thing? You got
to be joking or smoking or something.
Who cares what happens marketing-wise, it doesn't cost me anything.
Let all of those non-techies worry about marketing. I just use what
works for me whether its RH 7.3, 8, 9 or
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 12:43, Marek wrote:
> I would like to move my /var dir to some free space i have on a drive.
> How would i achieve this ?
Off the top of my head and totally untested...
Bring the system into single user mode, unmount /var (if it is on a
mount point), move the data
Andrew Kelly wrote:
naugaranch wrote:
Sounds like Red Hat is doing a MS-type end around. Abandon the RH 8.x
series and introduce RH 9 because it doesn't have a bad reputation.
When a release puts a better product in the hands of
the consumer it is a good and welcome thing. When a release
Hello all,
I am interested in updating to RH9. I have two options :
_ Doing a full install
_ Doing an update instal
Up until now I have always used the full install option and not the
update possibility. But I have installed a lot of programs and
configured a lot of things so I'
This isn't help on how to upgrade, but...
If you use wine, or CodeWeavers CrossOver Office or Plugin, you may want
to wait a bit before upgrading. The recent glibc errata update breaks
wine. I'm guessing Red Hat 9 will have the newer glibc, which will also
likely break wine. (Which by the way w
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 04:26:44PM -0600, Ronald W. Heiby wrote:
> Does anyone know where I can find a copy of Crack that runs on RH
> 8.0 and deals with MD5 passwords?
Crack doesn't seem to be well maintained these days. You might try a
program called "john the ripper", which handles md5 hashes
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 11:01:52AM -0800, Raul Acevedo wrote:
> If you use wine, or CodeWeavers CrossOver Office or Plugin, you may want
> to wait a bit before upgrading. The recent glibc errata update breaks
> wine.
It breaks a lot more than just Wine. PHP's gdbm functionality no longer
works (p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Everyone has what they want, except for those who want the same old
> thing If you want the same old thing, run Slackware. It hasn't
> changed in YEARS. As a consequence, it's a damn pain to maintain
From: "Cédric Chausson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hello all,
>
> I am interested in updating to RH9. I have two options :
>
> _ Doing a full install
> _ Doing an update instal
>
> Up until now I have always used the full install option and not the
> update possibility. But I have installed a lot of pr
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Cédric Chausson wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am interested in updating to RH9. I have two options :
>
> _ Doing a full install
> _ Doing an update instal
>
> Up until now I have always used the full install option and not the
> update possibility. But I have insta
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 07:57:24PM +0100, Cédric Chausson wrote:
> So I was wondering is the update installation option really feasible. I
> seem to remmeber having seen written that it did not work really good ?
>
> Comments, experiences ?
I've seen lots of reports from people that claim it wor
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Sebastian Bauer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm using RedHat 8 for a few weeks and try to stop the need of Windows
> products. But now I have a problem which isn't that funny.
>
> Sometimes - I cannot reproduce the problem - my Alt Gr key doesn't work
> the way it should. By pres
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Jason Dale wrote:
> In my part of the world in the southern hemisphere, Linux became
I'm in the same part of the world, and I've been using Red Hat since the
beginning.
> All said and done, I am still somewhat concerned myself as to why Red Hat 9
> is popping up so quick
Daniel T. Drea wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Gordon Messmer wrote:
Everyone has what they want, except for those who want the same old
thing If you want the same old thing, run Slackware. It hasn't
changed in YEARS. As a consequence, it's a damn pain to maintain.
I take offense to tha
>Cheers! (Relax...have a homebrew)
>Neil
The wise and immortal words of Charlie Papazion work in almost all situations, don't
they?
Philip
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
OK,
Thans all for the remarks.
I'll try the update way and let everyone know how it went.
Le 2003.03.25 20:28, Joe Klemmer a écrit :
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 13:57, Cédric Chausson wrote:
> I am interested in updating to RH9. I have two options :
>
>_ Doing a full install
>_ Doing an updat
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Cédric Chausson wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am interested in updating to RH9. I have two options :
>>
>> _ Doing a full install
>> _ Doing an update instal
>>
>> Up until now I have always used the full install option and not the
>> update possibility. But I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Daniel T. Drea wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Everyone has what they want, except for those who want the same old
> >>thing If you want the same old thing, run Slack
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 02:11:15PM -0500, John Kodis wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 04:26:44PM -0600, Ronald W. Heiby wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know where I can find a copy of Crack that runs on RH
> > 8.0 and deals with MD5 passwords?
>
> Crack doesn't seem to be well maintained these days. Yo
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 04:21:48PM -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 02:11:15PM -0500, John Kodis wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 04:26:44PM -0600, Ronald W. Heiby wrote:
> >
> > > Does anyone know where I can find a copy of Crack that runs on RH
> > > 8.0 and deals with MD5
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 10:33:35 -0800, you wrote:
>Comparing Red Hat to MS is ridiculous. As far as I can tell, Red Hats
>latest decisions, for which they've taken so much heat, are all the
>result of actually listening to their customers.
While I agree some of the decisions Red Hat has made have
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:40:24 -0800, Raul Acevedo wrote
> I do very much the same thing: save everything in /etc, /root and /home
> to a separate drive that is untouched by the upgrade, then do a full
> install, formatting all partitions except /home. I only do this on
> major x.0 releases; for x.y
Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> So your average person at home now has a choice of Windows XP at $300
> or Red Hat Enterprise Workstation at $300 ($60 a year after the first
> year for access to security fixes). Guess what, XP comes with full
> multimedia capabilities including MP3 and DVD, as well
Mike Vanecek wrote:
> Of course, that does not really help all the applications one has
> installed that are in /var or /usr (such as chkrootkit, spamassassin,
> wormscan, www apps, and so on). Might as well start from scratch.
Yep, it pretty much is starting from scratch. For major releases
Hi,
> I certainly can't recall messages on any of the Red Hat mailing lists
> or any survey asking for Red Hat to price their Linux product at the
> same price levels Microsoft charges, yet that is exactly what Red Hat
> has done (and in at least 1 case when you extend the price over a 3 or
> 4 y
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 15:40:11 -0800, you wrote:
>Gerald Henriksen wrote:
>
> > So your average person at home now has a choice of Windows XP at $300
> > or Red Hat Enterprise Workstation at $300 ($60 a year after the first
> > year for access to security fixes). Guess what, XP comes with full
> >
On Tuesday 25 March 2003 16:22, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> It just won't be provided after 12 months.
Wrong. popular releases will be supported for longer, releases such as 6.2 or
maybe even 7.3. If you read the fine print, it's "at least 12 months" not
"at the most 12 months". Seems to me tha
we'll see very soon, at the end of the month 6.2 and 7.0 will expire. I'm
curious if there will be any package updates, but I somehow doubt there
will.
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 March 2003 16:22, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> > It just won't be provided after 12 mo
> Obviously no one outside of Red Hat can speak fron actual experience in
> updateing to 9. Having said that I can tell you that my experience upgrading
> from various versions to the latest and greatest version have for the most
> part been very successful. Based on my personal experience I have
After 12 months, up2date goes away if you don't use enterprise.
THIS THREAD IS GOING OVERBOARD.
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 15:33, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 March 2003 16:22, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> > It just won't be provided after 12 months.
>
> Wrong. popular releases will be supporte
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 16:33:03 -0800, you wrote:
>On Tuesday 25 March 2003 16:22, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
>> It just won't be provided after 12 months.
>
>Wrong. popular releases will be supported for longer, releases such as 6.2 or
>maybe even 7.3. If you read the fine print, it's "at least 12 m
yes, it will do all types..
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 02:11:15PM -0500, John Kodis wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 04:26:44PM -0600, Ronald W. Heiby wrote:
> >
> > > Does anyone know where I can find a copy of Crack that runs on RH
> > > 8.0 and deal
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 06:29:04PM -0500, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> So your average person at home now has a choice of Windows XP at $300
> or Red Hat Enterprise Workstation at $300 ($60 a year after the first
> year for access to security fixes). Guess what, XP comes with full
> multimedia capabi
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 08:15:58PM -0500, Justin Zygmont wrote:
> we'll see very soon, at the end of the month 6.2 and 7.0 will expire. I'm
> curious if there will be any package updates, but I somehow doubt there
> will.
6.1 support has been terminated for quite a while. We simply grab the
6.
We have a series of machines that share the same nfs mounted user
directories. This nfs mounted filesystem has quotas enabled on the
server and one can indeed run quota on the server to find out your
quota. But on the clients the running is supposed to work through a
call to rpc.rquotad on the serv
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 18:29, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> While I agree some of the decisions Red Hat has made have been
> necessary and even good (even if Red Hat has screwed up the
> implementation and public relations aspects of at least some of them)
> they are also apparently ignoring a lot of t
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 19:22, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> Starting with Red Hat 8.0 errata are only provided for 12 months after
> release. The only products with errata periods longer than 12 months
> are the products in the Enterprise line.
With the average Joe User of Linux being used to
hi ,
I have a 40gb hdd , 128mb ram , pentium 4 1000mhz
hp pc
of the 40gb i have made two logical partitions
, of 22 gb & 18gb
22gb is reserved for windows xp , & on 18gb I
wish to install Linux 8.0 ,
i want to have a dual boot & keep the windows
xp as it is till I learn more & feel comfo
Title: Message
For
the purpose of learning Linux. I would leave the partitioning to linux. It will
create 3 partitions, 1 boot, 1 swap and the rest is for /.
RH8.0
install will automatically create the XP booting ability in GRUB, so that you
can boot back to windows if you wish. I would le
On Tuesday 25 March 2003 17:05, Michael Smith uttered:
> After 12 months, up2date goes away if you don't use enterprise.
Again, I point you to the "At least 12 months" No where does it say you get
12 months, and 12 months _only_ for up2date (RHN) services.
--
Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE
http://g
On Monday 24 March 2003 10:54 pm, Jack Bowling wrote:
> ** Reply to message from Stephen Carville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon,
24 Mar 2003 20:23:38 -0800
>
> > I have been looking at getting an external USB drive for backing
up
> > files on my home network and I see the Maxtor 3000LE (120 GB) is
Gerald Henriksen wrote:
I certainly can't recall messages on any of the Red Hat mailing lists
or any survey asking for Red Hat to price their Linux product at the
same price levels Microsoft charges, yet that is exactly what Red Hat
has done
They *have* been asked to provide a platform that will ha
Daniel T. Drea wrote:
Can large numbers of redhat machines be updated with a single comand from
one box?
That's what RHN is for, basically.
It's slackwares package management that I find make it "easier" to keep
updated with the latest releases of software. Just as you rely on rhn to
supply you up
** Reply to message from Stephen Carville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 25 Mar 2003
22:06:07 -0800
> On Monday 24 March 2003 10:54 pm, Jack Bowling wrote:
> > ** Reply to message from Stephen Carville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon,
> 24 Mar 2003 20:23:38 -0800
> >
> > > I have been looking at gettin
I think you made some very good points. I would only like to stress the
fact that:
1) a *nix environment is probably the _best_ web server out there...
(not to mention the cheapest)
2) linux has, and probably (even though we don't like to admit it)
always will be a more complex operating system.
You _must_ have winxp installed _first_. I'm not exactly sure why, but
that's said everywhere. Then just create a 256 swap partition, and use
the rest for the / partition. (Use Disk Druid to partition)
-Michael
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 19:25, valeed wrote:
> hi ,
> I have a 40gb hdd , 128mb ram , pe
thanks.
and yes i agree that the linux net and web and ftp and networky stuff is far bettter
than windows as i eluded to in my post.
And although i do agree that linux and unix systems are a bit more complex than
windows, they do not really have to be...
what i mean is this... windows does not
hi,
i am trying to create an apache user and group but i get prompted there
is a group by the name of apache and after clicking add to it, the box stays
there and doesn't goes off...it just keep looping back to the same box.i
tried to locate for such user and group and i use the filter button a
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 05:58:15AM -0600, naugaranch wrote:
> With all the problems I've had with Red Hat 8 - particularly on my server
> (still not running correctly and updated fully). I've actually considered
> regressing to 7.2 on my server.
>
> Sounds like Red Hat is doing a MS-type end arou
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 01:31:09PM +0100, Andrew Kelly wrote:
>
>
> naugaranch wrote:
> >
> > With all the problems I've had with Red Hat 8 - particularly on my server
> > (still not running correctly and updated fully). I've actually considered
> > regressing to 7.2 on my server.
>
> This is
Hi all,
I updated KDE to 3.1.1 with packages downloaded from www.kde.org. Since
then arts daemon doesnt work, so there is no sound. On KDE startup I
get message that /tmp/mcop-root is not owned by user (it is owned by
root), arts doesn't start and there is no sound. Of course I tried to
delete
This may not be a very structured and organised piece of prose on this issue, but it
includes all of what i essentially think on the topic. Please correct me if i am
wrong on any particular technical issue.
Windows and redhat might cost similar regarding the enterprise edition of redhat vs
win
Interesting that it breaks so much. The CodeWeavers email alerting
users that the Red Hat glibc errata breaks wine mentioned that
CodeWeavers is trying to persuade Red Hat to issue a glibc errata that
fixes the security problems but doesn't go from 2.2 to 2.3, hence not
also breaking wine and ever
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 13:57, Cédric Chausson wrote:
> I am interested in updating to RH9. I have two options :
>
> _ Doing a full install
> _ Doing an update instal
>
> Up until now I have always used the full install option and not the
> update possibility. But I have installed a l
I do very much the same thing: save everything in /etc, /root and /home
to a separate drive that is untouched by the upgrade, then do a full
install, formatting all partitions except /home. I only do this on
major x.0 releases; for x.y releases I just upgrade.
It works very well. It's nice becau
72 matches
Mail list logo
