: New NVidia drivers
I just tried these, and they didn't work very well. The GNOME panel
started having all sorts of weird redisplay errors. I had to go back to
the 3123 drivers.
Raul
Jurgen Kramer wrote:
> There are new NVidia closed sourced drivers up at:
>
> http://www.nvi
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 10:28:47 -0800
Raul Acevedo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
~ I just tried these, and they didn't work very well. The GNOME panel
~ started having all sorts of weird redisplay errors. I had to go back
to~ the 3123 drivers.
~
Sucessfull installation without any problem here (using
I just tried these, and they didn't work very well. The GNOME panel
started having all sorts of weird redisplay errors. I had to go back to
the 3123 drivers.
Raul
Jurgen Kramer wrote:
> There are new NVidia closed sourced drivers up at:
>
> http://www.nvidia.com/view.asp?IO=linux_display_i
There are new NVidia closed sourced drivers up at:
http://www.nvidia.com/view.asp?IO=linux_display_ia32_1.0-4191
including RedHat 8.0 support.
Cheers,
Jurgen
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 21:30, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thursday 21 November 2002 17:43, lovswr1 wrote:
> > Jesse..I don't have to worry about the warning?
>
> No, you don't. If you read the README, you would know that this replaces your
> currently existing GLX subsystem. All the fun of 3'rd pa
On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 21:30, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thursday 21 November 2002 17:43, lovswr1 wrote:
> > Jesse..I don't have to worry about the warning?
>
> No, you don't. If you read the README, you would know that this replaces your
> currently existing GLX subsystem. All the fun of 3'rd pa
On Thursday 21 November 2002 17:43, lovswr1 wrote:
> Jesse..I don't have to worry about the warning?
No, you don't. If you read the README, you would know that this replaces your
currently existing GLX subsystem. All the fun of 3'rd party, binary-only
drivers. Enjoy!
--
Jesse Keating
For We
On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 10:41, lovswr1 wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 18:35, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> > On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 08:20, lovswr1 wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 10:09, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > > On 21 Nov 2002 06:22:20 -0500
> > > > lovswr1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[big snip]
> > you
On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 20:29, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thursday 21 November 2002 17:11, lovswr1 wrote:
> > & this is what I got
>
> You're good. It's installed. Have fun.
>
Jesse..I don't have to worry about the warning?
WARNING!!
libGL.so.1.0.3123
--- The above file(s) possibly belon
On Thursday 21 November 2002 17:11, lovswr1 wrote:
> & this is what I got
You're good. It's installed. Have fun.
--
Jesse Keating
For Web Services and Linux Consulting, Visit --> j2Solutions.net
Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.org)
Was I helpful? Let others know:
http://svcs.affero.net/rm.ph
On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 18:35, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 08:20, lovswr1 wrote:
> > On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 10:09, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > On 21 Nov 2002 06:22:20 -0500
> > > lovswr1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > config file so I am typing this on the -18-18.8.0 kernel. Well now,
On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 08:20, lovswr1 wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 10:09, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On 21 Nov 2002 06:22:20 -0500
> > lovswr1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> config file so I am typing this on the -18-18.8.0 kernel. Well now, I'm
> in dependency hell. It tells me that it can't instal
On Thursday 21 November 2002 14:50, lovswr1 wrote:
> Well now, I'm
> in dependency hell. It tells me that it can't install the rebuilt
> nvidia kernel (-18-18.8.0) because it's already installed. Of course I
> can't rpm-e the so called installed nvidia kernel , because rpm says
> it's NOT isntall
On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 10:09, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 21 Nov 2002 06:22:20 -0500
> lovswr1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> # Ohhh! It is kerner-.src.rpm. That is the file I downloaded
> # from nvidia & that is the file the worked on -17-18.8.0, so I figured
> # that it should work on -18-18.8.0.
On Tuesday 19 November 2002 10:40, Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:
> Could you elaborate on where the scripts need improvement?
I haven't looked directly at them, but it takes your current running kernel as
the kernel it's supposed to compile against. Not a bad assumption really, as
I don't exactly
On 21 Nov 2002 06:22:20 -0500
lovswr1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# Ohhh! It is kerner-.src.rpm. That is the file I downloaded
# from nvidia & that is the file the worked on -17-18.8.0, so I figured
# that it should work on -18-18.8.0. Where do I get the .i386 version?
ok, ok, don't get confuse
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 20:58, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 November 2002 17:49, lovswr1 wrote:
> > How did you get the above for each kernel revision. Also when I see
> > someone say something like "make sure you have updated the
> > kernel-source" does that mean have the source loaded fo
On Wednesday 20 November 2002 17:49, lovswr1 wrote:
> How did you get the above for each kernel revision. Also when I see
> someone say something like "make sure you have updated the
> kernel-source" does that mean have the source loaded for the kernel that
> I want to compile against? If that is
gt; > attempting to start X. Will that make a difference? Also, do the
> no! However you get to the command line doesn't really matter. I
> usually do it this way (wait for X to fail, and then recompile) when
> I've forgotton that new linux kernel + old nvidia = no X!
>
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 23:48, Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:
> Iain Buchanan wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 04:10, Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:
> > > Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 19 Nov 2002 07:14:13 -0500
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Neal D. Becker) wrote:
> > > >
> > > > #
> > > > # Whic
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:
>So any kernel I boot has the NVdriver available.
>
>Which, I suppose, begs the question: "Is it my responsibility to build
>modules for my system, or Red Hat's, or Nvidia's?"
I can help with that one. You can remove Red Hat from the above
list
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 23:35:52 -0500
"Rinaldi J. Montessi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# Not being that familiar with rpm, I would consider it a shortcoming if
# you could not rebuild an existing rpm against another kernel source.
This can be done with RPM. You just gotta put some effort into it.
Iain Buchanan wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 04:10, Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:
> > Jesse Keating wrote:
> > >
> > > On 19 Nov 2002 07:14:13 -0500
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Neal D. Becker) wrote:
> > >
> > > #
> > > # Which is, BTW, stupid.
> > >
> > > Hey, don't look at me (;Bitch at Nvidia f
"Neal D. Becker" wrote:
>
> > "Rinaldi" == Rinaldi J Montessi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Rinaldi> Jesse Keating wrote:
> >>
> >> On 19 Nov 2002 07:14:13 -0500
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Neal D. Becker) wrote:
> >>
> >> #
> >> # Which is, BTW, stupid.
> >>
>
ll seem to mention booting to command line only
# (run level 3?) & not even attempting to start X. Will that make a
# difference? Also, do the nvidia drivers have to explicitly be for
# kernel ver.2.4-X.x.x? or will the current ones work for just about
# all flavors of 2.4-X.x .x?
You need the
y matter. I
usually do it this way (wait for X to fail, and then recompile) when
I've forgotton that new linux kernel + old nvidia = no X!
> nvidia drivers have to explicitly be for kernel ver.2.4-X.x.x? or will
> the current ones work for just about all flavors of 2.4-X.x .x?
Generally no!
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 04:10, Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
> >
> > On 19 Nov 2002 07:14:13 -0500
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Neal D. Becker) wrote:
> >
> > #
> > # Which is, BTW, stupid.
> >
> > Hey, don't look at me (;Bitch at Nvidia for poorly written install
> > scripts.
>
> "Rinaldi" == Rinaldi J Montessi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rinaldi> Jesse Keating wrote:
>>
>> On 19 Nov 2002 07:14:13 -0500
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Neal D. Becker) wrote:
>>
>> #
>> # Which is, BTW, stupid.
>>
>> Hey, don't look at me (;Bitch at Nvi
d line only (run level 3?) & not even
attempting to start X. Will that make a difference? Also, do the
nvidia drivers have to explicitly be for kernel ver.2.4-X.x.x? or will
the current ones work for just about all flavors of 2.4-X.x .x?
Thanks to all who have replied.
Jesse Keating wrote:
>
> On 19 Nov 2002 07:14:13 -0500
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Neal D. Becker) wrote:
>
> #
> # Which is, BTW, stupid.
>
> Hey, don't look at me (;Bitch at Nvidia for poorly written install
> scripts.
Could you elaborate on where the scripts need improvement?
Rinaldi
--
By al
On 19 Nov 2002 07:14:13 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Neal D. Becker) wrote:
#
# Which is, BTW, stupid.
Hey, don't look at me (;Bitch at Nvidia for poorly written install
scripts.
--
Jesse Keating
For Web Services and Linux Consulting, Visit --> j2Solutions.net
Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.or
I use the tars from nivdia.
Exit x by init 3
untar the GLX and the kernel files
as root make and make install both
edit the /etc/X11/XF86Config as the text or pdf explains...
load the text file into a second session, then you can refer to it as you
edit ;-)
while you're at it, why not include
> "Jesse" == Jesse Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jesse> On 18 Nov 2002 20:03:02 -0500
Jesse> lovswr1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jesse> # I also got the same error when i went from the kernel on the redhat
Jesse> # 8 discs, 2.4.18-14 to the current 2.4.18-17.8.0. I reali
On 18 Nov 2002 20:03:02 -0500
lovswr1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# I also got the same error when i went from the kernel on the redhat
# 8 discs, 2.4.18-14 to the current 2.4.18-17.8.0. I realized that I
# did not have the source loaded for 2.4.18-14 & as soon as I did this
# , I was able to upgr
> I had tryed that before but thinking i missed
>something i tryed again. Her
>was the out put of the rebuild... the kernel is
>already installed or
>something like that. Same for the GLX driver.
I >can see nothing wrong
>with the XF86Config file however the error log
>file reports (NI) not
I go to root & when I try to compile the nVidia drivers from
instructions at www.osnews.com that pertain specifically to psyche (this
is how I compiled the working drivers I now have) I get an error at the
first command.
rpm -i NVIDIA*
this returns the following error message
"
OK had to do a --force on both the rpms as it asumed they were already
compiled for the new kernel. All is well now.
Thanks for all the replys.
--
Regards,
Mister
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
At 02:33 PM 18/11/2002, you wrote:
Dan,
You need to recomiple and install the nvidia drivers again. They are compiled
against the specific kernel you are running.
Ryan
Mister ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*:
>
>The other night i upgraded my kernel and installed the nvidia drivers for
>my
On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 14:33, Ryan Bonham wrote:
> Dan,
>
> You need to recomiple and install the nvidia drivers again. They are compiled
> against the specific kernel you are running.
Yes, but only the NVIDIA_kernel driver, the NVIDIA_GLX files will work
fine. I think the only rea
I'd like to add that this is really annoying. It would be more
convenient if I could specify the kernel to compile against. The way
it is, you have to reboot first and make sure NOT to run X, or you're
in trouble. Then you can rebuild/install and start X.
Using the srpm package, there is no pro
The NVidia drivers are only for a particular kernel. Every time you
upgrade the kernel, you have to either download NVidia drivers for that
kernel or recompile the source RPM with the new kernel.
Raul
Mister wrote:
> The other night i upgraded my kernel and installed the nvidia drivers
You need to do the nvidia drivers again.
Roger
Around Mon,Nov 18 2002, at 02:13, Mister, wrote:
> The other night i upgraded my kernel and installed the nvidia drivers for
> my computer, all went well. The next thing i know there is another new
> kernel which i upgraded to and n
Dan,
You need to recomiple and install the nvidia drivers again. They are compiled
against the specific kernel you are running.
Ryan
Mister ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*:
>
>The other night i upgraded my kernel and installed the nvidia drivers for
>my computer, all went well. The nex
The other night i upgraded my kernel and installed the nvidia drivers for
my computer, all went well. The next thing i know there is another new
kernel which i upgraded to and now i cant get x to start, is there some
simple solution or have i buggerd things ?
Thanks for your help.
Dan Gordon
My GeForce4 4200 TI is working flawlessly on Psyche as well.
Cheers,
Chris Williams
On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 10:22, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 01 Oct 2002 18:08:18 +0200
Alejandro Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# but i have now NULL(i'm goingo to change today ;-)) and it is
# wo
nvidia drivers working under psyche yet?
Elliot
--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
"If you get to thinkin' you're a person of some influence,
try orderin'
Since 7.3 I have always used the tar balls and did so yesterday with no
problems for my Geforce 4mx card.
unpack the kernel and GLX tarballs an run make install as root in each
then edit the /etc/X11/XF86Config file to replace "nv" or in my case
"versa" with "nvidia" and also look for the other thi
On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 17:08, Alejandro Matos wrote:
> but i have now NULL(i'm goingo to change today ;-)) and it is working
> with Nvidia Gefoce2
> will i have problems with Psyche
I'm running Psyche with the latest Nvidia drivers, running a GeForce 2
MX 400 64MB and so
On Tue, 01 Oct 2002 18:08:18 +0200
Alejandro Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# but i have now NULL(i'm goingo to change today ;-)) and it is
# working with Nvidia Gefoce2
# will i have problems with Psyche
# Thanks
Who knows? With binary only drivers, all kinds of problems can
happen, and i
ROTECTED]> wrote:
# Has anyone gotten the nvidia drivers working under psyche yet?
Yes. I followed the steps I always do. Make sure to install the
"kernel-source" rpm. (NOT the .src.rpm). Download the GLX .src.rpm
and the kernel-module.src.rpm. rpmbuild --rebuild them both, and
ins
On 01 Oct 2002 11:29:46 -0400
Elliot Peele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# Has anyone gotten the nvidia drivers working under psyche yet?
Yes. I followed the steps I always do. Make sure to install the
"kernel-source" rpm. (NOT the .src.rpm). Download the GLX .src.rp
Has anyone gotten the nvidia drivers working under psyche yet?
Elliot
52 matches
Mail list logo
