Re: Evolution processes don't exit.

2003-02-20 Thread Michael Knepher
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 13:26, Camron W. Fox wrote: > Alle, > > I'm running a 2.4.18-24.8.0 kernel and Evolution 1.0.8-10. The problem > (or maybe it's a non-problem) is that when I exit Evolution, the > following processes remain: > > UIDPID PPID C STIME TTY TIME CMD > cwf

Re: Evolution processes don't exit.

2003-02-20 Thread Stephen Mah
Camron W. Fox wrote: Alle, I'm running a 2.4.18-24.8.0 kernel and Evolution 1.0.8-10. The problem (or maybe it's a non-problem) is that when I exit Evolution, the following processes remain: UIDPID PPID C STIME TTY TIME CMD cwfox 1623 1 0 11:17 ?00:00:00 oafd

Re: Evolution processes don't exit.

2003-02-20 Thread Mr. Adam ALLEN
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 21:26, Camron W. Fox wrote: > Alle, > > I'm running a 2.4.18-24.8.0 kernel and Evolution 1.0.8-10. The problem > (or maybe it's a non-problem) is that when I exit Evolution, the > following processes remain: > > UIDPID PPID C STIME TTY TIME CMD > cwf

Re: Evolution Problem

2003-01-29 Thread Tommy McNeely
right.. but the fact remains that evolution shouldnt fail connection because the mail server doesnt support or has that command disabled (like my ISP's mail server leo) Tommy On Sat, 2003-01-18 at 01:58, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 15:07, Tommy McNeely wrote: > > ... so ... appe

Re: Evolution (Receiving Mail)

2003-01-20 Thread Michael Knepher
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 10:29, Stephen H Carbin wrote: > At 10:54 AM 1/20/2003, you wrote: > >Hi guys, > >Tried several times to use evolution for receiving email > >I can send email alright but when it comes to receiving email, > >all options appear to fail. > >I am on a laptop with INTERNET, ip add

Re: Evolution (Receiving Mail)

2003-01-20 Thread Dave Sherman
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 14:57, Stephen H Carbin wrote: > > > > >I have had problems recv.'ing mail on mine also. Try enabling camel debug > >mode (after issuing the killev cmd) to see if yours also fails when the > >client issues the CAPA cmd. Still trying to solve that. > > > >steve > > Here's a

Re: Evolution (Receiving Mail)

2003-01-20 Thread Jesse Keating
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 15:57:59 -0500 Stephen H Carbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's a (possibly) stupid question: would Evolution require that I > enable telnet ? no -- Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE For Web Services and Linux Consulting, Visit --> j2Solutions.net Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.or

Re: Evolution (Receiving Mail)

2003-01-20 Thread Stephen H Carbin
I have had problems recv.'ing mail on mine also. Try enabling camel debug mode (after issuing the killev cmd) to see if yours also fails when the client issues the CAPA cmd. Still trying to solve that. steve Here's a (possibly) stupid question: would Evolution require that I enable telnet ?

Re: Evolution (Receiving Mail)

2003-01-20 Thread Stephen H Carbin
At 10:54 AM 1/20/2003, you wrote: Hi guys, Tried several times to use evolution for receiving email I can send email alright but when it comes to receiving email, all options appear to fail. I am on a laptop with INTERNET, ip address, mozilla all configured and running ok. Tried the local delivery

Re: Evolution Problem

2003-01-18 Thread Gordon Messmer
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 15:07, Tommy McNeely wrote: > ... so ... appearantly its a problem with evolution... none of the mail > servers around here think CAPA is a good idea :) Which is odd, because CAPA often describes what types of authorization a server provides: +OK Hello there. CAPA +OK Here'

Re: Evolution Problem

2003-01-17 Thread Tommy McNeely
Evolution is running "CAPA" to get the capabilities of the pop server... and when the pop server says "-ERR" .. appearantly Evolution is disconnecting... +OK POP3 QPOP (version 2.5) at leo starting. CAPA -ERR Unknown command: "capa". +OK klio Solstice (tm) Internet Mail Server (tm) POP3 2.0 p12

Re: Evolution Problem

2003-01-15 Thread Stephen H Carbin
OOPS! I need to clarify: My Linux box is on a home LAN, my mailserver is out there on the internet. The LAN is behind a SmoothWall firewall (sorry for the top-post) steve At 08:18 PM 1/15/2003, you wrote: I have a problem with Evolution receiving mail from my mailserver on my Linux box. Here is o

Re: Evolution Won't Start -- Missing Config DB

2003-01-04 Thread *
Randy; This is an old issue from what I've been able to gather. It exists in other distributions and other versions of Evolution, including the latest, 1.2. Look here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76366 You can fix the problem (sort of, it will continue to happen even aft

RE: Evolution Won't Start -- Missing Config DB

2003-01-03 Thread Michael Knepher
Check this page (from ximian.com's evolution knowledge base) for more info/suggestions: http://tinyurl.com/41wt Quick suggestions that I haven't seen yet: Make sure you have mozilla-nspr installed Try running oaf-slay -- Michael Knepher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL

RE: Evolution Won't Start -- Missing Config DB

2003-01-03 Thread rchrismon
On Fri, 03 Jan 2003 10:48:48 -0600 Randy Kelsoe said: > The fix is to add > /usr/lib/mozilla-1.x.x to /etc/ld.so.conf and run ldconfig.(Substitute > your mozilla version for the x's) Did you upgrade mozilla since you had > Evolution running? Thanks for your response. Yep, I did upgrade mozill

Re: Evolution Won't Start -- Missing Config DB

2003-01-03 Thread Randy Kelsoe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As a followup, I tried starting evolution from a terminal. In addition to the GUI error message I described in my prior message, I got the following message in the terminal: evolution-shell-WARNING **: Cannot access Bonobo/ConfigDatabase on wombat: (IDL:OAF/GeneralErro

RE: Evolution Won't Start -- Missing Config DB

2003-01-03 Thread rchrismon
As a followup, I tried starting evolution from a terminal. In addition to the GUI error message I described in my prior message, I got the following message in the terminal: evolution-shell-WARNING **: Cannot access Bonobo/ConfigDatabase on wombat: (IDL:OAF/GeneralError:1.0) The bonobo rpm is

Re: Evolution 1..2.1

2002-12-25 Thread Philippe
Found it ... I just give you the link,if anyone is interested. http://developer.ximian.com/projects/evolution/release_notes/1.2.1.html By the way, after reading it, I decided not to upgrade from 1.2 to 1.2.1. Philippe On Wed, 2002-12-25 at 19:32, Philippe wrote: > Hi, > Reading about RH 8.1,

Re: Evolution and Sony Clie

2002-12-03 Thread John Hosage
Keith, http://nick.kreucher.net/clie/ Try this site. I got my girlfriend's Clie working through information found here. I believe we updated the machine with a patched version of jpilot at one point. And permissions on one of the /dev/ links solved something. It was a while ago. Sorry. Joh

Re: Evolution

2002-12-03 Thread Keith Winston
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 11:50, John T. Douglass wrote: > > Unfortunately, evolution filters are not exclusive, meaning that if a > > message hits one filter, it will continue to check other filters. > > Hopefully, the evolution developers will add exclusive filters in a > > future version. > > Easy

Re: Evolution

2002-12-03 Thread John T. Douglass
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 07:49, Keith Winston wrote: > > It also seems i get reproducing messages in my filters. say message one > > fails on the first filter, on the third filter, and on the sixth filter, > > i'll get three messages in my 'spam' box. > > Unfortunately, evolution filters are not exc

Re: Evolution

2002-12-03 Thread Keith Winston
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 09:08, Donald G Wilson Jr wrote: > While i like evolution as an email program, i do seem to have some > problems adjusting to it's methods of filters. > > Is there someplace to see a log of filtering so i can look at a given > 'filtered' message and no which filter nailed it,

Re: Evolution

2002-12-03 Thread Rui Miguel Seabra
in five words: virtual folders On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 14:08, Donald G Wilson Jr wrote: > While i like evolution as an email program, i do seem to have some > problems adjusting to it's methods of filters. > > Is there someplace to see a log of filtering so i can look at a given > 'filtered' messag

RE: Evolution mail delivery & read receipts

2002-11-18 Thread Wolfgang Gill
>From what I've read, it doesn't have that ability yet. Or even plans to do it.. Wolf |-Original Message- |From: Neil Loffhagen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] |Sent: Monday, 18 November 2002 08:05 pm |To: Redhat 8.0 mailing list |Subject: Evolution mail delivery & read receipts | | |Hi, | |N

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0???

2002-11-16 Thread John
On 16 Nov 2002, lovswr1 wrote: > Well I did as you suggested. Magic carpet worked perfectly except for > one little caveat. The icon on the K Taskbar has disappeared. Do you > know how to get this link back? I guess the best place to ask is an Ximian list;-) -- Psyche-list mailing list

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0???

2002-11-16 Thread lovswr1
Well I did as you suggested. Magic carpet worked perfectly except for one little caveat. The icon on the K Taskbar has disappeared. Do you know how to get this link back? On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 22:17, Ryan Camick wrote: > On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 21:21, John wrote: > > On 12 Nov 2002, Brian K. Jo

Re: Evolution 1.2

2002-11-15 Thread Michael Knepher
I have about 6 accounts on three servers, and haven't had any problems. You might try checking the evolution FAQ/knowledge base at ximian.com. I think this was a problem with some earlier versions, so there might be a fix there. On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 08:13, Dan Clowater wrote: > Hey - is anyone el

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0

2002-11-14 Thread Gerry Tool
Iain Buchanan wrote: On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 09:32, Neil Hodge wrote: On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 08:01, Gerry Tool wrote: Did you ever find where to get libgal.so.20? I'm having the same problem trying to restore Red Hat evolution 1.2 after installing/deleting ximian packages. "Try this one: ftp:/

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0???

2002-11-13 Thread Dennis Gilmore
Go the redhat ones. i had the Ximian ones installed and when i saw the Redhat ones were out i downloaded and rebuilt the .src.rpm files and have found the redhat ones to be quicker. Dennis On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 10:20, Joe Klemmer wrote: > On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 00:28, Alex Duggan wrote: > > > Th

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0

2002-11-13 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 09:32, Neil Hodge wrote: > On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 08:01, Gerry Tool wrote: > > Did you ever find where to get libgal.so.20? I'm having the same problem > > trying to restore Red Hat evolution 1.2 after installing/deleting ximian packages. > "Try this one: > ftp://ftp.rpmfind.

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0???

2002-11-13 Thread Joe Klemmer
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 00:28, Alex Duggan wrote: > The evolution-1.2.0 rpms for redhat8 at > ftp://ftp.ximian.com/pub/ximian-evolution/redhat-80-i386/ work great. I keep getting "Could not accept a data connection: Connection timed out.". :-( -- "Khamaaa, Ham, HA

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0

2002-11-13 Thread Neil Hodge
Gerry: On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 08:01, Gerry Tool wrote: > Did you ever find where to get libgal.so.20? I'm having the same problem > trying to restore Red Hat evolution 1.2 after installing/deleting ximian packages. > > -- > gerry > _ > 0/0 > /__ "Try this one: ftp://ftp.rpmfind.net/li

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0???

2002-11-13 Thread Chris Kloiber
On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 10:04, John wrote: > London to a brick, the _only_ rpms that will match dependencies are Ximian's, > because Ximian can't be sure which RH RPM do match. Besides, RH has problems > matching dependencies against Ximian, and I don't see how the revers would not > also be true.

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0

2002-11-13 Thread Gerry Tool
Neil Hodge wrote: All: On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 05:21, Neil Loffhagen wrote: Got spell checking back working now. I had tried to install the aspell and pspell rpms with no success, it kept saying newer versions were already installed, as mentioned earlier, so had not tried the gnome-spell rpm. I

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0???

2002-11-13 Thread Tom Georgoulias
Brian K. Jones wrote: Installing evolution *did* cause red-carpet to grab and install some other stuff that evolution depended on. However, it tells you EXACTLY what it's going to do before it does *ANYTHING*. So I don't think anything would stop me from getting the needed rpm's myself somewher

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0

2002-11-13 Thread Neil Loffhagen
Hi Neil, Did you get the libgal21-0.21-1 from the same place you got the evolution rpms? Or did you already have it? I got all my evolution rpms from: ftp://ftp.ximian.com/pub/ximian-evolution/redhat-80-i386/ Found out why the evolution sync took so long. At first I thought it was wiping out

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0???

2002-11-13 Thread John
On 13 Nov 2002, Brian K. Jones wrote: > > On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 09:09, Tom Georgoulias wrote: > > Ryan Camick wrote: > > > > > That file, that is Red Carpet. It has ZERO dependencies. It does not > > > conflict with any existing RH8.0 packages. It will not interfere with > > > upgrades to the

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0

2002-11-13 Thread David Kvarnberg
On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 15:09, Neil Hodge wrote: > I'm having a bit of a different problem. I get the following during install: > > [root@zeus evo_rh]# rpm -Uvh *spell* > error: Failed dependencies: > libgal.so.20 is needed by gnome-spell-0.5-2 > > My system has the following: > > [root@z

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0???

2002-11-13 Thread Brian K. Jones
On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 09:09, Tom Georgoulias wrote: > Ryan Camick wrote: > > > That file, that is Red Carpet. It has ZERO dependencies. It does not > > conflict with any existing RH8.0 packages. It will not interfere with > > upgrades to the future version of RH, (if any exists, with no > > sp

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0???

2002-11-13 Thread Tom Georgoulias
Ryan Camick wrote: That file, that is Red Carpet. It has ZERO dependencies. It does not conflict with any existing RH8.0 packages. It will not interfere with upgrades to the future version of RH, (if any exists, with no speculation as to the version number, if it even has one). That is what B

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0

2002-11-13 Thread Neil Hodge
All: On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 05:21, Neil Loffhagen wrote: > Got spell checking back working now. I had tried to install the aspell > and pspell rpms with no success, it kept saying newer versions were > already installed, as mentioned earlier, so had not tried the > gnome-spell rpm. It installed f

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0

2002-11-13 Thread Neil Loffhagen
Got spell checking back working now. I had tried to install the aspell and pspell rpms with no success, it kept saying newer versions were already installed, as mentioned earlier, so had not tried the gnome-spell rpm. It installed fine, so now have a dictionary in place and in the new Composer Pr

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0

2002-11-13 Thread David Kvarnberg
On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 13:04, Neil Loffhagen wrote: > Also, there are three files in your set that are not in mine at all: > oaf-0.6.10-1.i386.rpm > ORBit-0.5.17-1.i386.rpm > ORBit-devel-0.5.17-1.i386.rpm > > Do you have any idea what these rpms are for? I think that you might have them installed

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0

2002-11-13 Thread Neil Loffhagen
Thanks for the info. I've looked at the dates and names of the rpms and some are different. It looks like a lot of the ones you used are newer, in that they have version numbers that are greater than some of my files, but then there are some of the files I used have greater version numbers. Also

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0

2002-11-13 Thread David Kvarnberg
On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 12:13, Neil Loffhagen wrote: > Being a windows user found the install abit frustrsting at times, as it > keep saying I need to install another package first, until finally got > to evolution itself. So I thought it would help to list the order I > installed the different pack

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0

2002-11-13 Thread Neil Loffhagen
Last night also downloaded and this morning installed Evolution 1.2 and it is faster, particularly when swapping from folder to folder to look at mail and being able to scroll through a long mail. I think it also loads a bit faster at startup, but not by much. Being a windows user found the insta

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0???

2002-11-12 Thread John
On 12 Nov 2002, Ryan Camick wrote: > On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 21:21, John wrote: > > On 12 Nov 2002, Brian K. Jones wrote: > > > > > I don't get it. What's so hard about installing red-carpet and getting > > > it from there, like the ximian site says to do if you're running RH8? > > > It's really

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0???

2002-11-12 Thread Ryan Camick
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 21:21, John wrote: > On 12 Nov 2002, Brian K. Jones wrote: > > > I don't get it. What's so hard about installing red-carpet and getting > > it from there, like the ximian site says to do if you're running RH8? > > It's really not that hard, and it works well. I'm writing t

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0???

2002-11-12 Thread John
On 12 Nov 2002, Alejandro [ISO-8859-1] González Hernández - Imoq wrote: > ... and it is HARD to uninstall. At least was Ximian in RHL 7.3. When I > tried to upgrade to 8.0, of course, I got a lot of dependency errors and > there was no obvious way to uninstall Ximian. Anyway, I did a lot of rpm >

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0???

2002-11-12 Thread John
On 12 Nov 2002, Brian K. Jones wrote: > I don't get it. What's so hard about installing red-carpet and getting > it from there, like the ximian site says to do if you're running RH8? > It's really not that hard, and it works well. I'm writing this in 1.2 > now, which I've had since almost immed

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0???

2002-11-12 Thread Gerry Doris
On 12 Nov 2002, Chris Kloiber wrote: > On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 09:24, Brian K. Jones wrote: > > I don't get it. What's so hard about installing red-carpet and getting > > it from there, like the ximian site says to do if you're running RH8? > > It's really not that hard, and it works well. I'm wr

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0???

2002-11-12 Thread Chris Kloiber
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 09:24, Brian K. Jones wrote: > I don't get it. What's so hard about installing red-carpet and getting > it from there, like the ximian site says to do if you're running RH8? > It's really not that hard, and it works well. I'm writing this in 1.2 > now, which I've had since

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0???

2002-11-12 Thread Alejandro González Hernández - Imoq
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 10:37, Brian K. Jones wrote: > > In the first place, it doesn't recognize my "mail/" folderspace, I have > > to configure it manually. Even after I configure it manually, I have to > > manually "subscribe" my mail folders so they appear under the account. > > Hasn't this alw

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0???

2002-11-12 Thread Brian K. Jones
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 11:09, Alejandro González Hernández - Imoq wrote: > > Anyway, I downloaded and installed (in a test computer) all the Ximian > Evolution's RPMs. It didn't crash randomly as the previous betas (from > Ximian and from rawhide), but it still doesn't do very well with my two > H

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0???

2002-11-12 Thread Robert A. Thompson
I would guess the big folders. I think it tries to do a count or something on them. I use regular imap (not imaps) and have similar results on accounts with big folders. --Robert On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 10:09, Alejandro González Hernández - Imoq wrote: > On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 08:54, Tom Georgoul

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0???

2002-11-12 Thread Alejandro González Hernández - Imoq
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 08:54, Tom Georgoulias wrote: > Brian K. Jones wrote: > > Did I miss something? Is there something wrong with the ximian rpmz? > > Ximian packages RPMS sometimes have gnome dependencies that are not > satisfied by standard Red Hat gnome packages. Installing Ximian RPMS

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0???

2002-11-12 Thread Tom Georgoulias
Brian K. Jones wrote: I don't get it. What's so hard about installing red-carpet and getting it from there, like the ximian site says to do if you're running RH8? It's really not that hard, and it works well. I'm writing this in 1.2 now, which I've had since almost immediately after the release

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0???

2002-11-12 Thread Brian K. Jones
I don't get it. What's so hard about installing red-carpet and getting it from there, like the ximian site says to do if you're running RH8? It's really not that hard, and it works well. I'm writing this in 1.2 now, which I've had since almost immediately after the release (oh yeah, I'm running

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0???

2002-11-12 Thread Tom Georgoulias
If you're looking for RPMs from the Red Hat maintainer, keep you eyes on this directory: http://people.redhat.com/~katzj/evolution/ or, of course, Rawhide. Jeremy had some 1.2 beta release RPMS up for a while. Tom -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mail

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0???

2002-11-12 Thread Alex Duggan
The evolution-1.2.0 rpms for redhat8 at ftp://ftp.ximian.com/pub/ximian-evolution/redhat-80-i386/ work great. Alex On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 21:26, Heiko Jones wrote: > Anybody have an rpm of evolution 1.2 for a stock 8.0 or even 7.3 yet?? > It came out today... > > I do not mean the ximian desktop

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0???

2002-11-12 Thread Alejandro González Hernández - Imoq
On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 20:26, Heiko Jones wrote: > Anybody have an rpm of evolution 1.2 for a stock 8.0 or even 7.3 yet?? > It came out today... I hope this one works... I tested the last beta a few days ago, and it crashed badly with my current configuration. I also tried to mv ~/evolution ~/evol

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0???

2002-11-11 Thread Dan Clowater
Running it now! Looks a lot cleaner as far as fonts and edges go. Settings are a bit more gui-friendly - has a lot more intuitive feel! Kudos. On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 21:34, Robert A. Thompson wrote: > You can get just the evolution rpm's from the ftp.ximian.com > /pub/ximian-evolution/redhat-80-i3

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0???

2002-11-11 Thread Robert A. Thompson
You can get just the evolution rpm's from the ftp.ximian.com /pub/ximian-evolution/redhat-80-i386 directory with out installing all the ximian desktop. Just mget *.rpm and then rpm -Uvh *.rpm ... worked for me(your milage may vary) --rat On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 20:26, Heiko Jones wrote: > Anybody

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0???

2002-11-11 Thread Tom Diehl
On 11 Nov 2002, Heiko Jones wrote: > Anybody have an rpm of evolution 1.2 for a stock 8.0 or even 7.3 yet?? > It came out today... > > I do not mean the ximian desktop stuff either, just plain old redhat > version. You might want to look in Rawhide in a few days. If/when someone from the Red Ha

Re: evolution 1.2 rpm for 8.0???

2002-11-11 Thread mr_fixer
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 02:26, Heiko Jones wrote: > Anybody have an rpm of evolution 1.2 for a stock 8.0 or even 7.3 yet?? > It came out today... > > I do not mean the ximian desktop stuff either, just plain old redhat > version. > > > > it say here http://www.ximian.com/products/evolution/do

Re: Evolution and reply-to header

2002-10-29 Thread Michael Knepher
On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 02:45, Bernd Kunze wrote: > Hi, > > anyone out there knowing how to set the reply-to header in evolution > permanentely? > > Thanks, > Bernd > > In the "Identity" setup options for each mail account is a field for a Reply-To: header. > > > > -- > Psyche-list mailing l

Re: Evolution and reply-to header

2002-10-28 Thread jim
On Sun, 2002-10-27 at 21:30, Bernd Kunze wrote: > On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 00:17, jim wrote: > > On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 02:45, Bernd Kunze wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > anyone out there knowing how to set the reply-to header in evolution > > > permanentely? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Bernd > > > > I a

Re: Evolution and reply-to header

2002-10-28 Thread Keith Winston
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 00:30, Bernd Kunze wrote: > > > anyone out there knowing how to set the reply-to header in evolution > > > permanentely? You can use the View / Reply-To Field to set it for individual messages and replies. I'm not sure how to set it permanently though. It may be in the help

Re: Evolution and reply-to header

2002-10-28 Thread Bernd Kunze
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 00:17, jim wrote: > On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 02:45, Bernd Kunze wrote: > > Hi, > > > > anyone out there knowing how to set the reply-to header in evolution > > permanentely? > > > > Thanks, > > Bernd > > I am not really sure what you want to do but the filters under the tools

Re: Evolution and reply-to header

2002-10-27 Thread jim
On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 02:45, Bernd Kunze wrote: > Hi, > > anyone out there knowing how to set the reply-to header in evolution > permanentely? > > Thanks, > Bernd I am not really sure what you want to do but the filters under the tools menu does most things I want to do. Jim Scott Of course ma

Re: Evolution Problem

2002-10-27 Thread Jonathan M. Slivko
On Sun, 2002-10-27 at 13:47, Ryan Camick wrote: > On Sun, 2002-10-27 at 09:07, Stephen H Carbin wrote: > > I am having a problem with evolution. For incoming mail I need to make a > > POP3 connection to mail.carbinworld.com, and for outgoing I need to connect > > to smtp.myisp.com. Outgoing mail

Re: Evolution Problem

2002-10-27 Thread Ryan Camick
On Sun, 2002-10-27 at 09:07, Stephen H Carbin wrote: > I am having a problem with evolution. For incoming mail I need to make a > POP3 connection to mail.carbinworld.com, and for outgoing I need to connect > to smtp.myisp.com. Outgoing mail works fine but I cannot get incoming > working. I have

Re: evolution font too small

2002-10-21 Thread Michael Biddulph
You can try going to: Start Here > Preferences > extras > HTML Viewer You can change font type and sizes here. Restart Evolution and it will use your new font selections. You will have to play with them a bit, some fonts won't display properly. On my 1024 x 768 screen I have it set at : Helvet

Re: evolution font too small

2002-10-21 Thread hans privat
hi, I also working with evolution, but in settings the only thing anyone can do is: you can set your fontstyle, but NOT the fontsize. The only thing anyone can do is to change the fontsize with the option "View--> Textsize --> bigger (or smaller). AND another bad behavior in evolution : if I'm wr

Re: evolution font too small

2002-10-20 Thread Jim Hayward
On Sun, 2002-10-20 at 12:17, P wrote: > Is there a way to change the font size used in evolution .. everything is > too small for me? > People who send HTML e-mails to the list will usually display with fonts that need a magnifying glass to read in Evolution. From the menu click View/message di

Re: Evolution 1.2 Beta

2002-10-19 Thread Gerald Henriksen
On 19 Oct 2002 08:59:05 -0600, you wrote: >Anyone have any luck building and/or installing Evolution 1.2 beta from >Ximian? I've started playing around with the RH7.3 source RPMs, but have >not successfully built them. Looks like quite a few dependency issues. >If anyone has this running, please d

Re: Evolution and key

2002-10-03 Thread David Kvarnberg
On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 12:56, Johan Hendriks wrote: > How do i remove mail from evolution > Now i get a line through it and thats it how to trash them? > > > Secondly when i installed the xmms rpm it tells me there is no key. > So i had to install it with the --nomd5 option. > > Must i activate

RE: Evolution and key

2002-10-03 Thread Struyve Joris
>How do i remove mail from evolution >Now i get a line through it and thats it how to trash them? Expunge folder in the menu or ctrl-e. Regards, Joris