On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 15:07, Tommy McNeely wrote:
> ... so ... appearantly its a problem with evolution... none of the mail 
> servers around here think CAPA is a good idea :)

Which is odd, because CAPA often describes what types of authorization a
server provides:

+OK Hello there.
CAPA
+OK Here's what I can do:
SASL LOGIN
STLS
TOP
USER
LOGIN-DELAY 10
PIPELINING
UIDL
IMPLEMENTATION Courier Mail Server

-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

Reply via email to