Ah, well, then my last, long semi-ranting email is probably for naught,
but I'm very pleased to hear this!
I'll probably wait until michel makes a Windows binary available,
because I've never gotten the gui to build on Fedora.
-Alan
John Darrington wrote:
Both CORRELATIONS and RELIABILITY a
Both CORRELATIONS and RELIABILITY are in the version 0.7.x (aka "master").
If you want to try it out I suggest that you download a tarball from
http://pspp.benpfaff.org/~blp/
The RELIABILTY command is not complete. But it does calculate Cronbach's
Alpha which is what most people seem to want it
William Simpson wrote:
I'm honestly shocked that no one else has mentioned correlations in this
I have 0.7.2 and it has
analyse/linear regression
I tested it just now and it gives r-squared. Take the square root and
use the sign of the slope -- voila, Pearson r.
As for reliability...
Isn'
>
> I'm honestly shocked that no one else has mentioned correlations in this
> thread... Is there a build switch that does enable some naive implementation
> of correlations? Or they've been implemented and I missed it? [I've got to
> be honest, I don't bother installing new versions because unti
Jason Stover wrote:
I'm not sure about the time frame, but among the new statistical
procedures will be GLM. What kinds of analyses do you most need?
Are correlations available yet? (Last week, my student just showed me
his PSPP installation and "Analyze > Correlations" was not an option.)
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 07:35 +, William Simpson wrote:
> My two cents
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Gene Shackman wrote:
> >
> > Sounds like a lot of great work being done on PSPP. I also add my thanks
> > to those developing the package.
> >
> > A couple of basic things were these t
I think that PSPP' main use is for heavy datafiles processing, where R
cannot be used.
PSPP, like SPSS, is a competitor for SAS.
programming capabilities are not on the same level between SAS, SPSS and R
or on another level matlab etc...
so what are the strength of these big datafiles systems ?
My two cents
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Gene Shackman wrote:
>
> Sounds like a lot of great work being done on PSPP. I also add my thanks to
> those developing the package.
>
> A couple of basic things were these that John mentioned
> * An improved output system.
> * Cut/Paste/Export to/
k from the bottom up. ANOVA is about
as basic a technique as you can get. If we are teaching it to 1st yr psych
students it's pretty basic, by definition!
--- On Thu, 11/12/09, John Darrington wrote:
From: John Darrington
Subject: Re: next version of PSPP
To: "Metin Ozdemir"
Don't forget that you're always welcome to download the latest development
version - just bear in mind it hasn't been thoroughly tested. If you just want
to know the major changes between the released version and the development
version,
you can take a look at the NEWS file. See:
http://git.sa
Sorry Jason if you get this twice:
I would like to adopt PSPP for my 1st yr psych research methods labs, but
the biggest objection people around here are raising is its lack of 2-way
anova.
In my opinion, I think you guys should work from the bottom up.
ANOVA is about as basic a technique as you
Jason Stover wrote:
...
What kinds of analyses do you most need?
Logistic Regression would be a great help for me
Scatter plots would be a great help for me.
___
Pspp-users mailing list
Pspp-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/psp
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:18:49AM +0100, Metin Ozdemir wrote:
> Hello Everybody,
> I am considering adopting a free statistics software in my research
> method course. PSPP is the best candidate right now because of its easy
> to use interface compared to syntax based programs such as R, and
13 matches
Mail list logo
