On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 10:07:09AM +0200, Dr. Oliver Walter wrote:
Am 14.10.2018 um 09:41 schrieb John Darrington:
> Which is why I suggested using one of the CDF functions.
> There is no T function, but there is a F function, which I think is the
> same if you set DF2 to
Am 14.10.2018 um 09:41 schrieb John Darrington:
Which is why I suggested using one of the CDF functions.
There is no T function, but there is a F function, which I think is the
same if you set DF2 to 1. But you probably know better than me about
those details. Perhaps IDF.F (0.05, N -1, 1) is
On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 09:28:47AM +0200, Dr. Oliver Walter wrote:
Am 14.10.2018 um 08:46 schrieb John Darrington:
> AGGREGATE OUTFILE * MODE ADDVARIABLES
> /BREAK=g
> /Mean = mean(V)
> /sd = sd(v)
> /n = n(v)
> .
>
> compute
Am 14.10.2018 um 08:46 schrieb John Darrington:
AGGREGATE OUTFILE * MODE ADDVARIABLES
/BREAK=g
/Mean = mean(V)
/sd = sd(v)
/n = n(v)
.
compute ci_upper=mean + sd/sqrt(n).
compute ci_lower=mean - sd/sqrt(n).
list.
Sorry for interrupting, but this doesn't give a 95% (or 9
> If I understand the use case properly, I think that you can do what
> you want with with an aggregate followed by a few simple compute
> commands: [...]
Thanks!
Werner
___
Pspp-users mailing list
Pspp-users@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailma
