Hello,
Can someone tell me what has happened to cause this message
to come to me from my server?
I don't generally get rejected spam messages
What made this message different from a simple rejected spam?
What's the trick?
Here's the source version of the message:
=
Return-Pat
According to a 'Received:' trace, the message originated at: [117.206.44.183],
[117.206.44.183] unknown [117.206.44.183]
Return-Path:
Message-ID: <20091215053103.946b27...@server.example.com>
Subject: For vince special 80% OFF on Pfizer
Non-encoded 8-bit data (char
I am receiving spam from an ever changing list of client IP addresses. Each
spam has tiny variations that prevent string matching. The one thing they
all have in common is the owner of the IP addresses. Is there any way to do
a prescreen or SMTP time lookup of the registrar/owner of the clien
I am receiving spam from ever changing client IP addresses. Each spam has
other tiny variations that prevent string matching. The one thing they all
have in common is the owner of the IP addresses. Is there any way to do
lookup of the client IP owner at Prescreen or SMTP time to REJECT the
i
tter at modifying code than writing it...
Anyone have anything similar?
Vince
how does one get off this list?
My attempts have all been blocked by majordomo.
Even Weitse's personal filter blocked my email /-:
- Original Message -
From: "Patrick Ben Koetter"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 4:38 PM
Subject: Re: RFC: postconf user interface
* Wietse
g in on a filter, your message will
likely get lost in the milieu.
__
Vince Sabio vi...@vjs.org
** At 12:01 -0500 on 12/28/2008, Vince Sabio wrote:
I'm looking for a perl script that can create an e-mail message with
a custom header (i.e., customized header-From and To lines, and
ideally customized envelope-From, so that I can route bounces to a
different address). I'm will
suspect that
harvesters (dumb harvesters, in this case) are parsing them out of
the Message-ID headers -- probably just taking everything from the
entire {header + body} of the message that has an "@" sign in it.
_____
own bug?
I am running Postfix v2.0.18 on FreeBSD v7.0. Any help/pointers
greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Vince
Return-Path: <>
Received: from hermes.mailbounce.net (71.126.154.133) by
pop.hermes.vjs.org with
ESMTP (Eudora Internet Mail Ser
likelihood of getting to the bottom of this error.
>I'd also grep the postfix log for warning messages that might be related to
>the spool file.
What you see above is "it."
__
Vince Sabio vi...@vjs.org
word and make work such as officials to offi cials, and sometimes
space is added in the url.
I would like to know if it is possible to configure postfix to fix it, or any
other ways.
Thanks a lot!
Vince
I am running a list server that uses Postfix 2.0.18 (yes, it's a little bit
creaky) as its MTA. On one of the lists, users are complaining that they are
receiving repeats of one specific message from one specific person; the repeats
are being sent out every 70 minutes. (Sounds like a requeue int
** At 08:23 -0400 on 06/18/2011, Wietse Venema wrote:
Vince Sabio:
Jun 18 00:24:16 ares postfix/qmgr[874]: 587564A7357:
from=, size=4031, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Jun 18 00:24:16 ares postfix/local[1935]: warning: 587564A7357:
trace service failure
Jun 18 00:24:16 ares postfix/local[1935
** At 13:33 +0200 on 06/18/2011, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 06/18/2011 10:57 AM, Vince Sabio wrote:
I am running a list server that uses Postfix 2.0.18 (yes, it's a
little bit creaky) as its MTA. On one of the lists, users are
complaining that they are receiving repeats of one specific me
d that the messages are added into the queue for 15
minutes and then I saw messages are sent out from the log file for around 15
minutes.
Is there anything wrong in our configure?
Thanks a lot,
Vince
Here is the main.cf:
# amavis loop
content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
smtpd_banner = $
ndmail? I could hack this, but I'd rather do it properly.
Muchas gracias
______
Vince Sabio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
** At 11:00 -0400 on 08/14/2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
Vince Sabio:
I upgraded my FreeBSD server to v7.0-RELEASE -- everything seems to
be running fine *except* for postfix. When I start postfix, I get:
ares-root# postfix start
postfix/postfix-script: warning: damaged message: corrupt
** At 15:42 + on 08/14/2008, Duane Hill wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Vince Sabio wrote:
Okay, I've upgraded to v2.4, which seems to be the most current
version in FreeBSD ports (not v2.5 ... not sure why). Now I just
need to figure out what to do with that damaged message.
When wa
** At 11:51 -0400 on 08/14/2008, Vince Sabio wrote:
** At 15:42 + on 08/14/2008, Duane Hill wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Vince Sabio wrote:
Okay, I've upgraded to v2.4, which seems to be the most current
version in FreeBSD ports (not v2.5 ... not sure why). Now I just
need to figur
** At 16:07 + on 08/14/2008, Duane Hill wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Vince Sabio wrote:
** At 15:42 + on 08/14/2008, Duane Hill wrote:
2.5.1 is there.
Here's what I've got:
ares-root# ls -ld /usr/ports/mail/postfix*
drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Aug 14 10:56 /usr/ports/ma
** At 16:40 + on 08/14/2008, Duane Hill wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Vince Sabio wrote:
when I try to install from /usr/ports/mail/postfix, I get:
===> Installing for postfix-2.5.1_2,1
===> postfix-2.5.1_2,1 conflicts with installed package(s):
postfix-2.4.7,1
They i
** At 20:20 -0400 on 08/15/2008, Vince Sabio wrote:
Thanks, Duane. For anyone else who is in the same situation with
Postfix on FreeBSD, Duane's suggestion worked very well -- I made
copies of the key files, did a pkg_delete on the old version,
make-install-clean on the new one, and
** At 22:16 -0400 on 08/16/2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
>Vince Sabio:
>> I suspect that I actually have two different versions of postfix
>> installed -- and different commands are being executed by different
>> versions. Any idea how to fix this without breaking things far
/postfix/
which seems to have been installed with 2.5.1, but newaliases appears
to be using the one in /etc/ (based on how postfix is routing mail).
Is there any way to check which alias file is being used?
___
** At 10:03 -0400 on 08/26/2008, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Vince Sabio wrote:
This morning, I added a new entry to the alias table, and ran
newaliases without error. I also did a "postfix reload". But the alias
is not being recognized; mail sent to the alias (from the
mandrake:
#saslauthd_path: /var/lib/sasl2/mux
# ubuntu 6.06:
saslauthd_path: /var/run/saslauthd/mux
Am I leaving anything out? Any bit of enlightenment would be most
appreciated!
/vjl/
--
Vince J. LaMonica Knowledge is knowing a street is one way.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
[i wrote:]
} > /etc/default/saslauthd:
} >
} > START=yes
} > DESC="SASL Authentication Daemon"
} > NAME="saslauthd"
} > MECHANISMS="shadow"
} > MECH_OPTIONS=""
} > THREADS=5
} > OPTIONS="-c -m /var/spool/postfix/var/run/saslauthd"
} You are not runn
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
} Yes. That's because you have too limit the list of available mechanisms in
} /etc/postfix/sasl/smtpd.conf to list plain and login only:
}
} pwcheck_method: saslauthd
} mech_list: PLAIN LOGIN
My /etc/postfix/sasl2/smtpd.conf [note sasl2 - previous
What's the matter with ab...@google.com and at spamcop.net?
On 2021/08/17 17:35 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On 17 Aug 2021, at 5:13 pm, SH Development wrote:
We have been getting inundated by spam from Google (gmail).
I know that if our server gets reported for even a few spammy messages,
Congratulations.
Vince Wang
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Miles Fidelman
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 1:21 PM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Goodbye IBM, Hello Google
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema
Wietse, Happy 25th birthday of your creation!
I recently upgraded to mail_version = 3.4.23
Postfix no longer logs IP addresses with the connections.
What did I break?
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an em
I recently upgraded to mail_version = 3.4.23
Suddenly, Postfix no longer logs the lines with IP addresses for the
connections.
There use to be some additional log lines with sender ip addresses.
What did I break? Why no sender data any longer?
Sample LOG block:
Jan 02 14:26:56 islou postfix/qm
33 matches
Mail list logo
