Hi,
I'm using postfix aliases for mapping incoming emails to my mailman mailing
lists, as described in the "Adding MySQL aliases" of this guide:
http://freemars.org/howto/mailman.html#conadd
What I'd like to do is to make this mapping sender-dependent. For instance,
a mail from pers...@gmail.com
he redirect mappings into a mysql
database directly, rather than write the mapping in a file, right? (e.g.: I
enter my aliases in the way described here:
http://flurdy.com/docs/postfix/#data)
Thanks for your help!
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Robert Wysocki
wrote:
> Dnia 2012-05-30, śro o go
6:59 AM, Robert Wysocki wrote:
> Dnia 2012-05-31, czw o godzinie 10:01 +0100, t t pisze:
>
> > an email from pers...@gmail.com to mail...@example.com should go
> > to mailm...@lists.example.com,
> >
> >
> > an email from pers...@gmail.com to another_l...@exampl
Hello, hopefully somebody can give me a clue on how to do this.
Right now I have emails coming from al...@theircompany.com to
distribut...@ourcompany.com.
I want to set up something in Postfix so that if the email is going to
distribut...@ourcompany.com, the From: address is automatically re-writ
Hello everybody,
postfix user since neraly two years approximately (runs like a swiss
cloickwork, THANKS to developers) but now I have a question I could not
resolve via reading the documentation:
My question is not about Postfix configuration but only on how to read
Postfix' loglines.
I hav
Noel,
thanks a lot for your help.
Just to precise my need for information:
> > 554 5.7.1
> > : Relay access denied;
>
> This is the response postfix sent to the remote client. The
> SMTP response is 554 (a permanent error) with an extended code
> of 5.7.1, and a text description of what wa
Noel and others,
> In the specific case of "Relay access denied" it will always
> be the recipient address, but there are other reasons for mail
> to be rejected.
>
> That section of the log line shows "what" was rejected along
> with a brief text description/reason.
>
> The "what" can be any pa
Hello everybody,
I have to setup a postfix mailserver with speecial requirements from the
customer side:
They do not want their sender IP addresses being visible in the mailheader
as seen by the recipients. Reason: They sometimes also communicate with
competitors and they fear to get spied th
it'd need
lots of additional work on all the client computers and so it wasn't the
quickiest way.
However, the header_checks thing was a ver quick and easy solution.
Thanks again
Tom
On Saturday 13 November 2010 20:16:49 /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 06:51:
Viktor, /dev/rob0,
thanks. Am already working also on this second step (Viktors proposal) as
this is really important (thanks for the hint, was already worrying about
unwanted effects).
Anyway I'm only running all this on a testing machine this time.
However, it's impressing what one can do wi
the production machine.
Again, thanks to ALL !
Tom
On Sunday 14 November 2010 18:44:59 /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 04:08:04PM +0100, t...@diogunix.com wrote:
> > I made it using the header_checks method using
> >
> > in main.cf:
> > header_checks = re
On 02/11/2011 04:54 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 2/11/2011 4:38 PM, Gergely Buday wrote:
Dear Postfix experts,
I'm new to mailing servers and need advice. Is it reasonable for my
small company to use my own mail server? How much configuration is
needed for a secure setup on a CentOS box?
Not too
Hi,
I've been asked to take over maintenance of a Postfix / Cyrus / LDAP
setup, and my background is in Courier / Exim. I've read as many docs
as I felt I could take in, but I'm still finding the learning curve a
little steep.
My basic problem is that I can't work out how to forward email to mor
2009/12/17 /dev/rob0 :
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 09:51:13AM +0000, T D wrote:
>> But then the users complained that the mail wasn't being delivered to
>> their IMAP mailbox, and it was being forwarded to the blackberry /
>> vodafone address around ten times!
>
>
Noel Jones wrote:
Bernard Higonnet wrote:
Hello,
I have my own little family mail server running postfix under FreeBSD
7.1-RELEASE #0.
I keep a journal of all ingoing and outgoing mail using always_bcc
which I'm happy with.
I recently installed amavisd-new and ever since I get duplicate email
Thanks. Further digging shows that my current setup was as described
in http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/README.postfix.old (which wasn't
old when I first started using it, heh). I see that it has been
supplanted by (the now 2-3 year old)
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/README.postfix.html whi
In the "Postfix SASL Howto", it says:
In order to allow mail relaying by authenticated remote SMTP clients:
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
...
...
This is how I configured my submission port in the past. In building
my new server, I see that the submissi
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 5:14 PM, mouss wrote:
> ...
> To allow relay, you need to configure smtpd_recipient_restrictions. By
> default, this contains
> permit_mynetworks
> reject_unauth_destination
> so if you don't change it, only "mynetworks" can relay. so you need to
> add permit_s
I'm having a terrible problem with
Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname
All error messages, config options etc are below
First trivial question: Why is the rejection message printed three
times? (I am running postfix -v)
Second, important question: I do not understand why my chec
, 948 bytes
191 128.65277610.3.1.12 -> 209.85.210.73 SMTP [TCP Retransmission] C: DATA
fragment, 948 bytes
192 129.82969810.3.1.12 -> 209.85.210.73 SMTP [TCP Retransmission] C: DATA
fragment, 948 bytes
193 129.84469410.3.1.12 -> 209.85.210.73 SMTP [TCP Retransmission] C: DATA
fragmen
Wietse Venema wrote:
Andrew T. Robinson:
delay=2005, delays=1283/0/361/361, dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred
delay=5004, delays=4283/0.01/361/361, dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred
delay=7283, delays=6561/0.01/361/361, dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred
I these numbers aren't "modified f
EC filing and calling the
corporate counsel, who returned my call instantly because he thought I
was accusing his company of SPAM (I never said or implied any such
thing, but the misunderstanding was fortuitous).
Andy
begin:vcard
fn:Andrew T. Robinson, CISM, CGEIT, CISSP, CSSLP
n:Robinson;Andrew
org:N
I'm rebuilding my postfix installation from scratch. In the past, I've
split cleanup in two, to prevent address rewriting until after
filtering:
pre-cleanup unix n - n - 0 cleanup
-o virtual_alias_maps=
-o canonical_maps=
-o sender_canonical_maps=
-o re
In connection with various other problems I shall probably need help
with later, I thought I might re-install Postfix 2.8.3 from ports in
FreeBSD 8.2. As part of the install I get the following messages:
Note: the following files or directories still exist but are
no longer part of Post
Hello,
Here is the system:
freebsd2.higonnet.net 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #0: Thu Feb 17
02:41:51 UTC 2011
r...@mason.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
I have just built postfix from source
Nov 11 20:12:41 freebsd2 postfix/master[64285]: reload -- version 2.8.7,
co
On 11/11/11 20:47, Noel Jones wrote:
On 11/11/2011 1:30 PM, Bernard T. Higonnet wrote:
Hello,
Here is the system:
freebsd2.higonnet.net 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #0: Thu Feb 17
02:41:51 UTC 2011
r...@mason.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
I have just built postfix
On 11/11/11 20:47, Noel Jones wrote:
On 11/11/2011 1:30 PM, Bernard T. Higonnet wrote:
Hello,
Here is the system:
freebsd2.higonnet.net 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #0: Thu Feb 17
02:41:51 UTC 2011
r...@mason.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
I have just built postfix
Hello,
I would like to force all users sending mail to provide a name and password.
As of this moment, if, in the mail client (Thunderbird anyway), I
specify that the smtp server requires name and password it works fine
(that is: name is requested and proper password required (duh)). But if
in t
I use StartCOM (http://www.startcom.org/) for all my SSL certificate
needs. I've had no problem with the certificates generated and signed
through them working with Postfix installations.
On 23.11.2012 20:46, The Doctor wrote:
I was wondering who is the best CA Cert for Postfix?
--
Member - Li
On 7/4/2013 8:01 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> gw1500:
>> It is not clear from the documentation if this is possible or how to do
>> it but I want to make authentication optional but if a user does
>> authenticate then I want to permit relaying. Can someone help?
> This is how permit_sasl_authenticate
On 7/4/2013 8:36 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> W T Riker:
>> On 7/4/2013 8:01 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> gw1500:
>>>> It is not clear from the documentation if this is possible or how to do
>>>> it but I want to make authentication optional but if a user do
On 7/5/2013 12:27 AM, b...@bitrate.net wrote:
> On Jul 4, 2013, at 20.44, W T Riker wrote:
>
>> On 7/4/2013 8:36 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> W T Riker:
>>>> On 7/4/2013 8:01 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>>>> gw1500:
>>>>>> It is
On 7/4/2013 11:21 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 7/4/2013 7:44 PM, W T Riker wrote:
>> On 7/4/2013 8:36 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> W T Riker:
>>>> On 7/4/2013 8:01 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>>>> gw1500:
>>>>>> It is not clear from the
On 7/5/2013 9:51 AM, Larry Stone wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jul 2013, W T Riker wrote:
>
>> Indeed this is using port 587. I did not realize that that in itself was
>> sufficient to prevent relaying from non-authenticated clients. Thanks.
>
> It doesn't. If 587 is configured t
Thanks. I fixed it.
On 7/5/2013 10:07 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 10:00:02AM -0400, W T Riker wrote:
>
>> Thanks for that explanation. I think I understand the way it works now
>> so I modified my restrictions a bit. Does this order p
On 7/5/2013 10:52 AM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> On 07/05/2013 04:07 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 10:00:02AM -0400, W T Riker wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for that explanation. I think I understand the way it works now
>>> so I modified my restriction
Sounds like you're trying to send email to a host that is possibly
greylisting.
On 13.10.2013 00:10, Roman Gelfand wrote:
sorry about this. I guess it has nothing to do with mx records. It
is the remote server telling me their server is not able to accept
mail.
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 12:04
he postfix
maillist...)
Regards,
BTJ
--
---
Bjørn T Johansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Someone wrote:
"I understand that if you play a Windows CD backwards you hear strange Satanic
messages&qu
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 07:08:32 -0400 (EDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wietse Venema) wrote:
> Bj?rn T Johansen:
> > Aug 20 12:36:44 web postfix/pipe[2802]: 88AC71FA25F: to=<[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]>, relay=dovecot, delay=0.09,
> > delays=0.07/0/0/0.02, dsn=5.4.6, status=bounce
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:16:22 -0400 (EDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wietse Venema) wrote:
> Bj?rn T Johansen:
> > On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 07:08:32 -0400 (EDT)
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wietse Venema) wrote:
> >
> > > Bj?rn T Johansen:
> > > > Aug 20 12:36:44 web p
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:08:33 -0400 (EDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wietse Venema) wrote:
> Bj?rn T Johansen:
> > On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:16:22 -0400 (EDT)
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wietse Venema) wrote:
> >
> > > Bj?rn T Johansen:
> > > > On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 07:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:17:43 -0400 (EDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wietse Venema) wrote:
> Bj?rn T Johansen:
> > > > > Please read the documents that I referred you to.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I did but I am not sure what the solution is? I see that the D
> &
The DMARC record itself looks fine and valid; however, the issue is going
to be whether your SPF and DKIM records alignment. I suspect the issue will
be in the alignment and the OP didn't provide those details to be able to
evaluate.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 11:47 PM Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On 20
I've had my Postfix mail server running for several years now using
Postfixadmin to manage the database tables holding my virtual mailbox
information for domains I'm hosting mail from. It's become time to move
this mail server so I'm having to rebuild it and I'm wanting to put the
mailboxes beh
On 8/23/2015 12:33 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 23.08.2015 um 18:15 schrieb Jeremy T. Bouse:
>> I've had my Postfix mail server running for several years now using
>> Postfixadmin to manage the database tables holding my virtual mailbox
>> information for dom
On 9/13/2016 1:16 PM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are running postfix v2.11.0 on CentOS 6.8 as a gateway server and
> we have recently imposed helo restrictions.
>
> Few servers have problems sending us mail due to the helo restrictions:
>
> Sep 8 09:35:37 mailgw1 postfix/smtpd[18791]: N
I want to build and test (at least a little) a new server to replace an
existing, production one.
The old one is on machine xxx.xxx.xxx.A running FreeBSD10/Postfix 3.0.2
and the new one on xxx.xxx.xxx.B running FreeBSD11/Postfix 3.1.3.
I would much appreciate advice on how best to define the
System FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0
Postfix version 2.9.1
After screwing up a working postfix server (by erasing main.cf and
various tables and then restoring out-of-date backups...) I find that
incoming mail is seemingly "(delivered to maildir)" and then removed
from same! Her
I'm going ahead and asking here as I've been searching and haven't
found any information...
I've been using PostgreSQL, and MySQL in the past, to hold virtual user
information for my Postfix server. The only thing that has bothered me
is every *sql_*.cf file I had to setup had to have the user
On 1/26/2017 2:15 AM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> * Jeremy T. Bouse :
>> I'm going ahead and asking here as I've been searching and haven't
>> found any information...
>>
>> I've been using PostgreSQL, and MySQL in the past, to hold virtual user
On 1/26/2017 3:58 AM, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> ## Jeremy T. Bouse (jeremy.bo...@undergrid.net):
>
>> I've been using PostgreSQL, and MySQL in the past, to hold virtual user
>> information for my Postfix server. The only thing that has bothered me
>> is every
On 1/27/2017 7:03 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jeremy T. Bouse:
>>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/libpq-pgservice.html
>>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/libpq-connect.html
>>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/libpq-pgpa
On 1/27/2017 7:03 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jeremy T. Bouse:
>>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/libpq-pgservice.html
>>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/libpq-connect.html
>>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/libpq-pgpa
On 1/27/2017 11:41 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>> On Jan 27, 2017, at 6:37 PM, Jeremy T. Bouse
>> wrote:
>>
>> I tried to set up a PGPASSFILE
>> that I 'chmod 0600' and 'chown postfix' then added the
>> export_environment settin
On 1/28/2017 12:16 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Sorry about that, I should have written 'import_environment'. That
> setting controls what Postfix uses internally, including in its
> pgsql client.
>
> Wietse
Okay so am I doing something wrong here... I've got the following in
my main.cf:
On 1/28/2017 6:10 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jeremy T. Bouse:
> [ Charset windows-1252 converted... ]
>> On 1/28/2017 12:16 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> Sorry about that, I should have written 'import_environment'. That
>>> setting controls what Postfix use
On 1/29/2017 6:41 AM, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> ## Jeremy T. Bouse (jeremy.bo...@undergrid.net):
>
>> Everything is working fine... So with the PGPASSFILE set in
>> import_environment and I've confirmed through procfs that it is in the
>> environ fil
On 1/30/2017 10:27 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Viktor Dukhovni:
>>> On Jan 30, 2017, at 8:57 AM, Jeremy T. Bouse
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I also found when
>>> testing with 'postmap -q' I had to include the PGPASSFILE environment
>>&g
Hi Wietse,
>> Oct 1 14:31:37 www postfix/qmgr[15204]: warning: connect to transport
>> private/lsmtp: No such file or directory
>
> Fix that.
I am not sure where it expects `private/lsmtp` to be located though.
-Jason
I noticed that, a typo from earlier.
But now it seems I cannot send, nor receive e-mail:
Oct 1 16:12:05 www zmmailboxdmgr[25272]: status OK
Oct 1 16:12:20 www postfix/smtpd[25394]: connect from mail[192.168.1.27]
Oct 1 16:12:20 www postfix/smtpd[25394]: A6EDD1A8043C:
client=mail[192.168.1.27]
So it looks like incoming e-mail might be working now, outgoing not so much.
Oct 1 16:33:32 www clamd[20590]: SelfCheck: Database status OK.
Oct 1 16:33:33 www postfix/smtpd[32650]: connect from
localhost.localdomain[127.0.0.1]
Oct 1 16:33:33 www postfix/smtpd[32650]: 64D131A8045E:
client=local
>> So it looks like incoming e-mail might be working now, outgoing
>> not so much.
>
>> Oct 1 16:34:03 www postfix/smtp[3362]: connect to
>> gmail.com[74.125.224.149]:25: Connection timed out
>
> This looks quite like a "disable_dns_lookups=yes" issue. The question
> then would be: how was it work
I am building a new CentOS 6.5 server. In the past I have just used Zimbra
for ease. Not, since I am behind a pfsense box that does some IP mapping
Zimbra requires a "split-dns" setup.
I thought that it might be time to cum out Zimbra and just use Postfix,
Dovecot, etc. I gound a great tutorial.
this is probably due to syslog facility/daemon, not postfix.
eg. personal rsyslog.conf :
#mail.info -/var/log/mail.info
#mail.warn -/var/log/mail.warn
#mail.err /var/log/mail.err
mail.* -/var/log/mail.log
so, comment out whatever you don't want a
not sure why you don't just block the ip/subnet of that client in
firewall (?) or just try postscreen + postscreen_access_list with
client ip/subnet..
is it coming from gmail or another too-big-to-block sender?
The "access" file currently contains REJECT lines for both "spamgateway.nil" (no
Hello,
I am working on upgrading an old and pretty broken Postfix setup I inherited.
I managed to get it cleaned up, and running on Postfix v3.9.
The server's using Spamhaus DQS dnsbls @ postscreen, and the policy it uses is
reject on match.
They're working like they should for postscreen, reje
Hello,
> Why empty unless under stress???
I've no idea yet. I hadn't gotten that far. Was starting with 'first contact'
-- at postscreen -- and working inwards.
> > cat /etc/postfix/postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map
> Only used by postscreen(8).!
> This was not blocked by postscreen(8) and so was h
hey,
not sure about your setup, but rspamd can also check email with clamav [1].
that way, there is no need to add clamav to postfix (as content_filter
or milter).
d.
[1] https://rspamd.com/doc/modules/antivirus.html
Στις 9/9/24 13:53, ο/η Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users έγραψε:
I hav
Στις 3/3/25 17:32, ο/η Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming via Postfix-users
έγραψε:
Noted Patrick. I will ask Virtualmin developers to use clamd instead of
clamdscan and clamscan.
On Monday, March 3rd, 2025 at 11:25 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users
wrote:
* Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo
69 matches
Mail list logo
