Hello, > Why empty unless under stress???
I've no idea yet. I hadn't gotten that far. Was starting with 'first contact' -- at postscreen -- and working inwards. > > cat /etc/postfix/postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map > Only used by postscreen(8).! > This was not blocked by postscreen(8) and so was handled by smtpd(8), Aha, ok. I thought that was postscreen. I misunderstood the flow. Thanks. > > It looks like it's using the "default_rbl_reply" instead of the match from > > "postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map". > > That parameter is not applicable for connections passed to smtpd(8). I'm not clear on that. It seems to be using the form in that map. > You need to use the same table for both smtpd(8) and postscreen(8). > That is: > > rbl_reply_maps = ... some table ... > postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map = ... same table ... Ok that I can do. > And of course that table needs to match all the applicable keys. I guess that's the first question then. Why DIDN'T it match+reject "@ postscreen", passing it through to the internal smtpd instead? Thanks. -- Arnie _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org