Hello,

> Why empty unless under stress???

I've no idea yet.  I hadn't gotten that far.  Was starting with 'first contact' 
-- at postscreen -- and working inwards.

> > cat /etc/postfix/postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map

> Only used by postscreen(8).!
> This was not blocked by postscreen(8) and so was handled by smtpd(8),

Aha, ok.  I thought that was postscreen.  I misunderstood the flow.  Thanks.


> > It looks like it's using the "default_rbl_reply" instead of the match from 
> > "postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map".
> 
> That parameter is not applicable for connections passed to smtpd(8).

I'm not clear on that.
It seems to be using the form in that map.

> You need to use the same table for both smtpd(8) and postscreen(8).
> That is:
> 
> rbl_reply_maps = ... some table ...
> postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map = ... same table ...

Ok that I can do.

> And of course that table needs to match all the applicable keys.

I guess that's the first question then.
Why DIDN'T it match+reject "@ postscreen", passing it through to the internal 
smtpd instead?

Thanks.

--
 Arnie
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org

Reply via email to