Rewriting the MAILER-DAEMON address and header formats

2021-09-17 Thread Vladimir Mishonov
Greetings! I'm writing here because, apparently, in 2021, there is still no other way to report bugs or suggest features for Postifx. That's a bummer, but please let me get to the point. I've been setting up a personal mailserver using Postfix, and while I don't have a lot of experience in L

Re: Rewriting the MAILER-DAEMON address and header formats

2021-09-18 Thread Vladimir Mishonov
On September 18, 2021 1:37:19 PM GMT+03:00, Nick Howitt wrote: > > >On 18/09/2021 11:32, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote: >> >> Dnia 18.09.2021 o godz. 08:39:41 Vladimir Mishonov pisze: >>> 2. While the above is mostly for aesthetical reasons, there is one >>> other

Re: Rewriting the MAILER-DAEMON address and header formats

2021-09-18 Thread Vladimir Mishonov
On 2021-09-18 20:37, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: The "MAILER-DAEMON" form is a long-standing heritage from Sendmail, appears in "countless" aliases files, and may even in some environments be subject to case-sensitive matching. As much as you may feel it is "SHOUTING", on balance I think we should no

Re: Rewriting the MAILER-DAEMON address and header formats

2021-09-18 Thread Vladimir Mishonov
On 2021-09-18 21:22, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: The issue is entirely cosmetic, and the only audience for these notices is the postmaster, not naïve users. So unless Wietse is feeling exceedingly generous with his time, I don't expect to see this change any time soon. If someone wants to contribute

Re: Rewriting the MAILER-DAEMON address and header formats

2021-09-19 Thread Vladimir Mishonov
On 2021-09-19 05:48, raf wrote: [suggestions] I think I've already managed to convince my OCD that just having modern header formats will be enough, but thank you anyway for your suggestions. :) At this point, I'm simply afraid that something else might break if such invasive changes are a

www.postfix.org not working from certain locations

2022-02-09 Thread Vladimir Mishonov
Hello again. It looks like www.postfix.org is not available if browsing from certain locations within Russia and Belarus, and some other European countries (Netherlands, Norway, Ukraine) seem to be partially affected too. See availability test results here: https://ping-admin.com/free_test/re

Re: www.postfix.org not working from certain locations

2022-02-09 Thread Vladimir Mishonov
On 2022-02-09 11:44, Silvio Siefke wrote: Hello, On Wed, 09 Feb 2022 11:34:03 +0300 Vladimir Mishonov wrote: It looks like www.postfix.org is not available if browsing from certain locations within Russia and Belarus, and some other European countries (Netherlands, Norway, Ukraine) seem to

Re: www.postfix.org not working from certain locations

2022-02-09 Thread Vladimir Mishonov
On 2022-02-09 15:58, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote: Dnia 9.02.2022 o godz. 12:58:55 Ralph Seichter pisze: * Vladimir Mishonov: > It looks like www.postfix.org is not available if browsing from > certain locations within Russia and Belarus [...] The server hosting the Postfix website does not u

Re: www.postfix.org not reachable from certain locations

2022-02-09 Thread Vladimir Mishonov
On 2022-02-09 16:34, daniel Azuelos wrote: [ Rédigé dans le sens de lecture professionnel. Written in the professional reading direction. ] Le (on) 09/02/2022, Vladimir Mishonov a écrit (wrote): | If possible, please investigate and try to resolve this issue. Since you seem in a good

Re: www.postfix.org not reachable from certain locations

2022-02-09 Thread Vladimir Mishonov
On 2022-02-09 19:31, daniel Azuelos wrote: • your DNS is not working, but it is coming from your ISP: alfatelecom.cz: whois -> route: 95.46.0.0/15 descr: IP-AS.COM / IP-AS.RU Master route origin: AS44546 % host 95.46.224.1 Host 1.224.46.9

Passing final recipient address to policy service

2022-02-11 Thread Vladimir Mishonov
Hello again. I apologize in advance for a lot of text. This question relates to a Postfix+Dovecot setup, but I'm posting it in the Postfix list because I think this should be solved on the Postfix side. I have a small personal mail server with a MariaDB virtual users backend hosting several

Re: Passing final recipient address to policy service

2022-02-11 Thread Vladimir Mishonov
On 2022-02-11 19:30, Wietse Venema wrote: Consider using reject_unverified_recipient, instead of using the dovecot quota check. https://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#recipient That would work with both 1:1 aliases and 1:n ones. Wietse Interesting, I never thought o