g in on a filter, your message will
likely get lost in the milieu.
______
Vince Sabio vi...@vjs.org
** At 12:01 -0500 on 12/28/2008, Vince Sabio wrote:
I'm looking for a perl script that can create an e-mail message with
a custom header (i.e., customized header-From and To lines, and
ideally customized envelope-From, so that I can route bounces to a
different address). I'm will
suspect that
harvesters (dumb harvesters, in this case) are parsing them out of
the Message-ID headers -- probably just taking everything from the
entire {header + body} of the message that has an "@" sign in it.
_____
One of my users sent me the attached bounce (note: I've made some
purely cosmetic changes to the bounce message, to remove the user's
e-mail address and change FQDNs so that the server doesn't start
getting spammed as a result of this posting -- but the content of the
bounce has not been materi
likelihood of getting to the bottom of this error.
>I'd also grep the postfix log for warning messages that might be related to
>the spool file.
What you see above is "it."
__
Vince Sabio vi...@vjs.org
I am running a list server that uses Postfix 2.0.18 (yes, it's a little bit
creaky) as its MTA. On one of the lists, users are complaining that they are
receiving repeats of one specific message from one specific person; the repeats
are being sent out every 70 minutes. (Sounds like a requeue int
** At 08:23 -0400 on 06/18/2011, Wietse Venema wrote:
Vince Sabio:
Jun 18 00:24:16 ares postfix/qmgr[874]: 587564A7357:
from=, size=4031, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Jun 18 00:24:16 ares postfix/local[1935]: warning: 587564A7357:
trace service failure
Jun 18 00:24:16 ares postfix/local[1935
** At 13:33 +0200 on 06/18/2011, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 06/18/2011 10:57 AM, Vince Sabio wrote:
I am running a list server that uses Postfix 2.0.18 (yes, it's a
little bit creaky) as its MTA. On one of the lists, users are
complaining that they are receiving repeats of one specific me
ndmail? I could hack this, but I'd rather do it properly.
Muchas gracias
______
Vince Sabio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
** At 11:00 -0400 on 08/14/2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
Vince Sabio:
I upgraded my FreeBSD server to v7.0-RELEASE -- everything seems to
be running fine *except* for postfix. When I start postfix, I get:
ares-root# postfix start
postfix/postfix-script: warning: damaged message: corrupt
** At 15:42 + on 08/14/2008, Duane Hill wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Vince Sabio wrote:
Okay, I've upgraded to v2.4, which seems to be the most current
version in FreeBSD ports (not v2.5 ... not sure why). Now I just
need to figure out what to do with that damaged message.
When wa
** At 11:51 -0400 on 08/14/2008, Vince Sabio wrote:
** At 15:42 + on 08/14/2008, Duane Hill wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Vince Sabio wrote:
Okay, I've upgraded to v2.4, which seems to be the most current
version in FreeBSD ports (not v2.5 ... not sure why). Now I just
need to figur
** At 16:07 + on 08/14/2008, Duane Hill wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Vince Sabio wrote:
** At 15:42 + on 08/14/2008, Duane Hill wrote:
2.5.1 is there.
Here's what I've got:
ares-root# ls -ld /usr/ports/mail/postfix*
drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Aug 14 10:56 /usr/ports/ma
** At 16:40 + on 08/14/2008, Duane Hill wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Vince Sabio wrote:
when I try to install from /usr/ports/mail/postfix, I get:
===> Installing for postfix-2.5.1_2,1
===> postfix-2.5.1_2,1 conflicts with installed package(s):
postfix-2.4.7,1
They i
** At 20:20 -0400 on 08/15/2008, Vince Sabio wrote:
Thanks, Duane. For anyone else who is in the same situation with
Postfix on FreeBSD, Duane's suggestion worked very well -- I made
copies of the key files, did a pkg_delete on the old version,
make-install-clean on the new one, and
** At 22:16 -0400 on 08/16/2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
>Vince Sabio:
>> I suspect that I actually have two different versions of postfix
>> installed -- and different commands are being executed by different
>> versions. Any idea how to fix this without breaking things far
/postfix/
which seems to have been installed with 2.5.1, but newaliases appears
to be using the one in /etc/ (based on how postfix is routing mail).
Is there any way to check which alias file is being used?
___
** At 10:03 -0400 on 08/26/2008, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Vince Sabio wrote:
This morning, I added a new entry to the alias table, and ran
newaliases without error. I also did a "postfix reload". But the alias
is not being recognized; mail sent to the alias (from the
18 matches
Mail list logo
