Is it possible for SMTP AUTH to CHECK or force a "Mail From" Address?

I have Postfix set up using virtual domains with sasl enabled such that to send an e-mail they need to login with "usern...@domain.com". As it is, however, when a user logs in to the smtpd, they can thereafter treat my mail server as an open relay & forge their "Mail From" address to come from any

Re: Is it possible for SMTP AUTH to CHECK or force a "Mail From" Address?

> Patrick wrote: >> I have Postfix set up using virtual domains with sasl enabled such that >> to >> send an e-mail they need to login with "usern...@domain.com". >> >> As it is, however, when a user logs in to the smtpd, they can thereafter >> tr

Restrict some users to local recipients only?

same end result.) I realize security measures would also need to be taken to lock down the machine from which the mail is being sent, but that's not my problem ;) Thanks, Patrick

Re: Restrict some users to local recipients only?

Hi Dominik, I believe envelope senders is what he's wanting, though SASL authenticated users could probably work, too. Patrick On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Dominik George wrote: > Hi Patrick, > > > I have a customer who would like to configure the Postfix server he u

Re: Time based blacklist or similar?

2 maxretry = 1 bantime = 86400 It works like a charm and requested IPs are banned within seconds of my request, automatically expiring after the "bantime" passes. Patrick On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Chad M Stewart wrote: > > Before I go and write my own solution I though

Multiple relay destinations

smtp_fallback_relay the correct method to do this? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Patrick Saweikis

RE: Multiple relay destinations

>> Patrick Saweikis wrote: >> >> Hello >> >> >> >> We are using postfix 2.3.8 and have it integrated with >> mysql and transport maps are set on a per domain basis this way >> (transport_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-transport

Huge active queue and system idle, not delivering

ook up in tons of threads in many places but haven't found a real solution. I just found that Postfix could send 1 million emails per hour when I send less than a half million in 24 hours. Please help Patrick

Re: Huge active queue and system idle, not delivering

Le 07/01/2010 20:03, Barney Desmond a écrit : 2010/1/8 Patrick Chemla Incoming messages are entering very fast (500 smtp processes declared) and the active queue is actually of 2 millions messages waiting for delivery. here is my main.cf file: That's some very thorough inform

Re: Huge active queue and system idle, not delivering

Le 07/01/2010 20:00, Wietse Venema a écrit : Patrick Chemla: Hi, I am running Postfix 2.5.6 on a Fedora 11 Linux system on a hardware based Intel I5/750 Quad Core, 8 Gb memory, 160Gb SSD hard disk. Incoming messages are entering very fast (500 smtp processes declared) and the active

Re: Huge active queue and system idle, not delivering

Le 07/01/2010 23:47, Stefan Caunter a écrit : On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Patrick Chemla wrote: said "I just found that Postfix could send 1 million emails per hour when I send less than a half million in 24 hours", but I can't make sense of that, sorry. I h

Re: Huge active queue and system idle, not delivering

Le 07/01/2010 20:37, Victor Duchovni a écrit : On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 08:29:44PM +0200, Patrick Chemla wrote: Here the logs: This is just the qmgr(8) warnings about a clogged queue. Other than telling us that all the mail is going to "localpc2105.com", this is not v

Re: Huge active queue and system idle, not delivering

Le 08/01/2010 03:03, Wietse Venema a écrit : Patrick Chemla: But the CPU of the box is idle more than 80%. It is clear that it is not a matter of CPU, nor memory, nor disk. Something in the number of processes/users/simultaneous tasks is blocking. Indeed, the symptom of blocking

Re: Huge active queue and system idle, not delivering

Le 08/01/2010 00:43, Victor Duchovni a écrit : On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 12:30:34AM +0200, Patrick Chemla wrote: Jan 7 22:02:57 postfix postfix/qmgr[26441]: 5B91F873F6: removed Jan 7 22:02:57 postfix postfix/smtp[27180]: 375DDD5923: to=, relay=a139.localpc2105.com[10.0.0.139]:25, conn_use

Re: Huge active queue and system idle, not delivering

h one. Am I correct ? or I am dreaming of another mail transport package? Patrick

Re: Huge active queue and system idle, not delivering

lookup hits=0 miss=2492 success=0% Jan 9 19:15:21 postfix postfix/scache[18038]: statistics: max simultaneous domains=1 addresses=4 connection=4 What means miss=89 success=55%, miss=2492 success=0%? Thanks Patrick

Re: Huge active queue and system idle, not delivering

Hi Stan, Thanks for your interest. Le 09/01/2010 20:21, Stan Hoeppner a écrit : Patrick Chemla put forth on 1/9/2010 11:17 AM: Hi all, I got these statistics: Jan 9 19:15:21 postfix postfix/scache[18038]: statistics: start interval Jan 9 19:09:03 Jan 9 19:15:21 postfix postfix/scache

Re: Huge active queue and system idle, not delivering

Le 09/01/2010 20:54, Stan Hoeppner a écrit : Patrick Chemla put forth on 1/9/2010 12:37 PM: I wen t there but did not find explanations about miss address lookup or miss domain lookup. While I have 122,000 messages in active queue I still don't understand why statistics sho

Re: Huge active queue and system idle, not delivering

fork. Of course, if you want me to post my conf, I will with pleasure. Many thanks to you, to Victor and Stan. Patrick

Re: Huge active queue and system idle, not delivering

l database where he keeps all unsubscribe messages. He said he has the right filters not to send unwanted emails. Thanks Patrick

Re: Huge active queue and system idle, not delivering

Le 11/01/2010 01:13, Wietse Venema a écrit : Patrick Chemla: Wietse, Please try the following, as asked half a week ago: postconf -e smtp_connection_cache_on_demand=no postfix reload and report if this makes a difference. Wietse I have tested this

Re: Huge active queue and system idle, not delivering

Le 11/01/2010 09:27, Stan Hoeppner a écrit : Patrick Chemla put forth on 1/11/2010 1:02 AM: Le 10/01/2010 23:58, Stan Hoeppner a écrit : On a technical level I'm happy you got it working. Just please tell us you're not sending mass spam with this setup. -- Stan

Can't send from script and don't understand NOQUEUE error

k rcpt to: patr...@ootbcomp.com 451 4.3.5 Server configuration problem rcpt to: patrick 451 4.3.5 Server configuration problem rcpt to: patr...@ootbcomp.com. 451 4.3.5 Server configuration problem quit 221 2.0.0 Bye Connection closed by foreign host. I can email from my machine using firefox to the same addre

Re: Can't send from script and don't understand NOQUEUE error

Patrick Horgan wrote: I'm setting up a python script to do some sysadmin stuff and if it detects a problem I want it to email. It does the email, but the server rejects it. Taking python out of the picture, I did this: I've "fixed" this. postgrey was not running, but

Run levels question

While investigating why postgrey wasn't running on our fedora box, I checked to see what run levels it was set to run at, and indeed it wasn't set up to run at any. Then, since there wasn't any useful information in the /etc/init.d/postgrey file about what run levels it should start at, I che

Re: load balancing among mail servers

"less random" solution and a more scientific one I did this to load balanced among 40 mail servers. It works very very fine with a load difference of less than 2% among the 40 servers. I don't think it is too random. Patrick

Re: load balancing among mail servers

recision in the load balancing. I don't think there is a need for keepalive, or any expensive device to do it. Patrick

How to manage local blacklist on my postfix relay?

think spamassassin is for local delivery, not relay. So I have a file of more than 100,000 email addresses and another made of bad domains. I can write scripts in shell, php, perl, Your help will be welcomed. Patrick

routing according to sender domain, not recipient domain

like : sender_dependent_relayhost_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/senderdomainroutes ? Thanks for help Patrick * *

multi instances and multi interfaces

wonder it will be routed according to the route table through the default interface. Is there a way to send through separate interfaces ? Thanks for help Patrick

Re: monitoring sevreal postfix serevrs.

Le 27/04/2010 10:54, Patrick Ben Koetter a écrit : * Israel Garcia: > I have about 20 debian servers send all mail through a loadbalancer > (haproxy) with 2backend smarthosts which send emails to internet. I > have pflogsumm running only on every smarhost. As every smarthost

Re: monitoring sevreal postfix serevrs.

he server side, with grep and awk extract from all qstatXXX files the data you want to show for each graph, you can generate with whatever tool. There I do it with a munin script, it's simple. Patrick

postfix multi-instances and qmail co-existence

bin/sendmail ? /var/qmail/bin/sendmail ? What will arrive if qmail uses /usr/sbin/sendmail or postfix uses /var/qmail/bin/sendmail ? Whenever, postfix starts, all instances, and I can process messages. Is this a correct production environnement? Thanks for help Patrick

Re: postfix multi-instances and qmail co-existence

ch one before I move completly. So, should I change the links to sendmail? Patrick

group message delivery per domain

a new connexion for each message. Some ISPs told me they prefer to receive for example 50 messages to different recipients during one connexion, than getting 50 different new connexion. Maybe there is some parameters to manage persistent connexions? Thanks for help. Patrick

Allowing only certain From:... to send email to a specific To:... possible?

tain To: ... (the full email address) that was specifically used to register with the TLD in From: ... is accepted, otherwise REJECT. Hope this makes sense. Anyone know if this is possible and how I can implement this? Pointers most welcome and appreciated. Thanks and regards, Patrick

Re: Allowing only certain From:... to send email to a specific To:... possible?

that. -- Noel Jones Thanks Noel. I was hoping I could do it within Postfix to keep things lean & mean. Will check out your suggestions. Kind regards, Patrick

Postfix binaries pointed to /opt/lib

pt/include/openssl -I/opt/include -I/opt/include/sasl \ -DUSE_TLS \ -DHAS_DB \ -DHAS_PCRE \ -DUSE_SASL_AUTH \ -DUSE_CYRUS_SASL" \ AUXLIBS="-L/opt/lib -R/opt/lib -lssl -lcrypto -ldb -lpcre -lsasl2 -L/lib -lpthread" With regards, Patrick

Re: Postfix binaries pointed to /opt/lib

I was able to fix this. It would appear that the rpath was not being picked up for some reason in the AUXLIBS via the -R flag. I was able to overcome this by setting the environment variable LD_RUN_PATH=/opt/lib On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Patrick Baker wrote: > Hello, > > I

relay local domains to a specific server

will happen. At least, not what I want. I made something wrong, but what? Thanks for help. Patrick

Re: relay local domains to a specific server

Le 23/05/2010 18:20, Wietse Venema a écrit : Patrick Chemla: Hi, I am managing my emails on 2 Postfix 2.7 servers. A front smtpd server receives all messages from outside and inside users, and a back server handles email boxes for local domains deliveries. I am trying to send directly

Re: relay local domains to a specific server

look at the maillog and I can find the IP address of the external server where it tries to deliver. Patrick

Re: relay local domains to a specific server

Le 23/05/2010 22:03, Wietse Venema a écrit : > Obviously you have something like... > > transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport > > in your "main.cf", don't you? This was my problem. Sorry for wasting your time. Thanks for help Gian Carlo Patrick

closing connection issue?

cleanup[79669]: 008D71714FA: message-id=<33219176.10166.1275486674403.javamail.r...@co4> Jun 2 15:51:22 ru postfix-mailgw/qmgr[71565]: 008D71714FA: from=, size=5598, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Jun 2 15:51:22 ru postfix-mailgw/smtp[79016]: 008D71714FA: to=, orig_to=, relay=192.168.0.76[192.168.

Re: closing connection issue?

not afraid about a bug in postfix, I was more concerned about a change in postfix that I could have overlooked and that would explain the change in SMTP session between my servers. thanks to Victor, this particular "problem" is solved now. regards, Patrick PRONIEWSKI -- Administr

Re: closing connection issue?

Hi Victor, On 2 juin 2010, at 18:49, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 05:14:45PM +0200, Proniewski Patrick wrote: > >> So it appears that the connection between MAILGW and LB is not always >> properly closed. Am I wrong? > > http://www.pos

Re: closing connection issue?

ore an upgrade, because I can't risk to break a production server. But this time, I was creating a new server from scratch, with what I think was plenty of time to test it before switching to prod. Not reading release notes was just a huge mistake. regards, Patrick PRONIEWSKI -- Adm

trouble with smtp session during before-queue content filtering

others have been confronted to this issue. Any idea other than patching amavisd? thanks, Patrick PRONIEWSKI -- Administrateur Système - SENTIER - Université Lumière Lyon 2 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: trouble with smtp session during before-queue content filtering

ption is to use the Postfix 2.7 smtpd_command_filter feature > to replace the RCPT TO command very carefully. It works perfectly. Thank you very much. I use smtpd_command_filter to replace invalid "MAIL FROM" and "RCPT TO" commands. Patrick PRONIEWSKI -- Administrateur Système - SENTIER -

Re: trouble with smtp session during before-queue content filtering

onfigurable in amavisd-new, I would have to patch the code, and that would have become a pain to maintain. smtpd_command_filter is the easiest solution. I've already 3 postfix instances (postmulti), I don't want to add another one just for one appliance. thanks, Patrick PRONIEWSKI -- A

smtpd & soft_bounce

I was attempting to set soft_bounce=yes on the smtpd service in master.cf only to find that it didnt work. This was unexpected as the man pages indicate otherwise. 'man 8 smtpd' lists soft_bounce under 'trouble shooting controls'. But I've found that instead it works when placed on the 'smtp' s

Re: Better spam filter for postfix

very fast, but it works. In France, we have a similar limitation: it's illegal to destroy a communication (mail, email…). With BQCF spam is rejected, not destroyed. Patrick PRONIEWSKI -- Administrateur Système - SENTIER - Université Lumière Lyon 2 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Regexp for blocking dynamic hosts?

regex foo is pretty non-existant. Does anyone know what regexp line would block such a hostname? Thanks for any pointers. Regards, Patrick

Re: Regexp for blocking dynamic hosts?

hanks Stan. Much appreciated. Regards, Patrick

timeout trouble with postfix and amavisd in BQCF

ot;smtp-liste" to "eat" every possible connexion to "smtp" during a local emailing, I've set it's smtp_destination_concurrency_limit to 1, so that other more legitimate clients (3 physical users) can still send emails during a local emailing. Let me know if you n

Re: timeout trouble with postfix and amavisd in BQCF

quot;smtp" and "smtp-liste" postfix instances are sending local domain emails to "mailgw", "smtp-liste" send huge bursts of emails (like 3 recipients in 2-3 minutes), and it can greatly impact normal email delivery. So I throttle "smtp-liste" so that physical users emails posted via "smtp" are not delayed by a (useless) corporate emailing. Thank you very much for your reply Patrick PRONIEWSKI -- Administrateur Système - SENTIER - Université Lumière Lyon 2 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: timeout trouble with postfix and amavisd in BQCF

"smtp" or "smtp"->"mailgw"->"smtp" or "smtp-liste"->"mailgw"->"smtp" (recipient address in our domain, but finally rewritten into an external address) is very low. These days, this traffic is higher, because addresses of +2000 users are aliased to a remote domain (it's 7% of our active users, 3% of our total users list), so we have many emails going from "mailgw" to "smtp". But I don't see how few more emails can wreak havoc in amavisd. That would be a good idea to plug "mailgw"-to-"smtp" traffic on an smtpd without filtering. Patrick PRONIEWSKI -- Administrateur Système - SENTIER - Université Lumière Lyon 2 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: timeout trouble with postfix and amavisd in BQCF

without high machine load... I'll double check my settings, but in theory, I don't use RBL for inside email traffic filtering. Patrick PRONIEWSKI -- Administrateur Système - SENTIER - Université Lumière Lyon 2

Re: timeout trouble with postfix and amavisd in BQCF

eyDB perl module). enable_db=0 does the trick, for now. I've found this about amavisd and BDB performance problem on FreeBSD: <http://www.mail-archive.com/amavis-u...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg15381.html> I'll test ASAP. regards, Patrick PRONIEWSKI -- Administrateur

some watchdog timeout

tination. Any idea about where I should start looking? Patrick PRONIEWSKI -- Administrateur Système - SENTIER - Université Lumière Lyon 2 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: some watchdog timeout

re Tools. I'll try to get some support from VMWare (and FreeBSD users), but if someone here has an idea (vmware issue? bios tuning? freebsd tuning?...) I'd be happy to read about it. thanks, Patrick PRONIEWSKI -- Administrateur Système - SENTIER - Université Lumière Lyon 2 smime.p

Re: some watchdog timeout

igher. I'm running Postfix 2.7.1 on top of FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE-p2 #0, amd64, on top of ESXi 4 But if it's linked to virtualization, it might be a vmware tools problem... Patrick PRONIEWSKI -- Administrateur Système - SENTIER - Université Lumière Lyon 2 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: postfix logging feature

Victor Duchovni wrote: Postfix is not Psychic. Have you tried postfix --psychic?

Can I give a different CERT for local or remote clients?

other mail servers will relay mail to us for delivery to our domain. Is there any way to make this work? Patrick

So--how do I set up localhost to not require authentication

I'd like email from localhost to not require certificates or authentication--especially since we assume that people on the machine, or tunneling to the machine have already passed some level of authentication. How do I do it? Patrick

Re: So--how do I set up localhost to not require authentication

nticated the same as permit_sasl_authenticated,permit_mynetworks? Patrick

Re: So--how do I set up localhost to not require authentication

rification because I'm so surprised!  (And because it seems to be working just fine right now!) patrick

virtual aliases and unlisted email addresses

on2.frpublic-addr...@univ-lyon2.fr ... The first line looks pretty silly to me. Is there any way to tell that addresses not listed in virtual aliases map are to be forwarded "as is" ? Thanks, Patrick PRONIEWSKI -- Administrateur Système - DSI - Université Lumière Lyon 2

Re: virtual aliases and unlisted email addresses

On 8 juin 2011, at 18:15, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 11:33:48AM +0200, Patrick Proniewski wrote: > >> After the period of double delivery is over, we will deliver emails only to >> Google servers. So the virtual aliases map is to look like: >> >

Re: virtual aliases and unlisted email addresses

On 9 juin 2011, at 17:46, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 10:12:17AM +0200, Patrick Proniewski wrote: > >> On 8 juin 2011, at 18:15, Victor Duchovni wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 11:33:48AM +0200, Patrick Proniewski wrote: >>> >

Re: Questions about queue cli commands

d mail in the delivery process of postfix (to force > the retry of the delivery) > > - postsuper -r ALL -r is not for retry, it's for requeue. Don't use it unless you really want the requeue process to be done. Use postqueue -f instead. Patrick PRONIEWSKI -- Administrateu

Re: allow mutual authentication with ssl certificate

client certificate authentication with self-signed certificates with Thunderbird 3, Postfix and Dovecot that come with CentOS 5. Worked fine. Regards, Patrick

Fighting virtual_mailbox_domain errors

ilguard.nl (sender_access) Thanks! Patrick

Re: Fighting virtual_mailbox_domain errors

Thank you very much Noel. Setting inet_protocols = ipv4 solved the errors right away. Your help is much appreciated! Have a good weekend. Regards, Patrick

Re: Throttling

On 09/29/2011 12:00 PM, Tolga wrote: mydestination = vps.ozses.net, localhost.ozses.net, , localhost To my untrained eye the two comma's (".net, , localhost") don't seem right and the error seems to suggest that you need to install, configure and start cyrus-sasl. Regards, Patrick

Re: Plesk or equivalent to manage Postfix ?

On 11/04/2011 02:13 PM, Frank Bonnet wrote: Hello Does anyone has ever use Plesk or another graphical interface to manage Postfix ? Maybe http://sourceforge.net/projects/postfixadmin/ Regards, Patrick

Re: Anyone else getting lots of spam from Plesk web sites?

a hole in Plesk which Plesk fixed but I guess some hosters or admins are slow to update. Once the security issue became public the dark side has been searching the Interwebs for vulnerable servers. Guess they found some to send you their crap. Regards, Patrick

Re: New default settings for "submission" service?

Quoting Wietse Venema : Patrick Ben Koetter: - Do not delay on port 25 for MTA to MTA communication With this. the sysadmin has no clue about what mail is blocked. Even postscreen goes through great efforts to report the sender and recipient of blocked mail. Along these lines, would

Re: postgrey outgoing mail whitelister

Quoting Henrik K : On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:04:43AM +0100, Sam Jones wrote: Just imagine whitelisting a shared, spammy server because a domain is hosted on it. Naturally it will probably come through greylisting in the end anyway, but I'd not go out of my way to make it easy on them! A shar

Re: Timeout after DATA with postfix

Quoting Alex : Hi, I have a few postfix-2.8.7 systems on fedora15 that connect with another postfix-2.8.7 system. I'm receiving the following messages periodically in the logs: Apr 24 16:24:43 mailrelay postfix/smtpd[8814]: timeout after DATA (9832 bytes) from mail02.example.com[68.XXX.YYY.4

LMTP for smtpd_proxy_filter

Hello, I'd like to know if there are any plans to enable LMTP with the smtpd_proxy_filter? Regards Patrick

How to block forged From: in DATA section?

d the example header_checks [1] from the BACKSCATTER_README which work fine except that they also block my own email. What is the proper way to block forged From: addresses in the DATA section? Thanks for any pointers or which FMTR. Regards, Patrick /etc/postfix/header_checks: /^(From|Return

Re: How to block forged From: in DATA section?

; there is no proper way > > simply because it is legitimate that From: is not the same as > the envelope sender - if you are trying to block such mails > you would block many regular mails! Thank you for making that clear. Regards, Patrick

Re: Adding subdomains (DNS problem)

anything I'm missing? Does postfix know that is is responsible for subdomain.devels.es? Regards Patrick

Re: Adding subdomains (DNS problem)

lately? In this case your problem could be caused by outdated cached records. Regards Patrick

Re: ot: head office/branch office mailserver howto?

user2_a...@example.com smtp:asia.example.com #remote user On asia.example.com it should work with one fixed transport (e.g. relay_transport = virtual) for all users handled by this server. Patrick

Re: lmtp transport

y question - do I need or want to configure a "dovecot-lmtp" in master.cf as well? No, you don't as lmtp:unix:private/dovecot-lmtp is a unix socket provided by dovecot. Patrick

Re: Block sending from non-US IPs

On 10/18/2012 10:24 PM, mouss wrote: you can try http://countries.nerd.dk/more.html you can also try GeoIP. Also check out http://ipdeny.com/ Regards, Patrick

Re: Latest package for RHEL6

On 10/22/2012 04:56 PM, Morten Stevens wrote: [snip] > I have backported Postfix 2.9.x for my company and I am also package maintainer for Fedora. Here are my latest builds for el6: http://mstevens.fedorapeople.org/el6/postfix/ Would you mind making the SRPM also available? Regards, Patrick

Re: Latest package for RHEL6

On 10/22/2012 05:29 PM, Patrick Lists wrote: On 10/22/2012 04:56 PM, Morten Stevens wrote: [snip] > I have backported Postfix 2.9.x for my company and I am also package maintainer for Fedora. Here are my latest builds for el6: http://mstevens.fedorapeople.org/el6/postfix/ Would you m

enabling double delivery for some users

er side, the From: address would get an delivery error message, right? Any help greatly appreciated! Patrick

Re: enabling double delivery for some users

I'm running Postfix 2.9.x on MX and training servers, so it should be ok. Thank you very much for your help. Patrick

Re: Out Of Office Responders

t of Office responders and afaik both use Postfix as MTA. Regards, Patrick

Re: Support for MDB in postfix 2.10?

S 6.3 x86_64 box libmdb compiles with a simple make and make install puts it by default in /usr/local. It contains manpages too. Is that what you are looking for or do you need an actual packaged version like an RPM? Regards, Patrick

Re: Support for MDB in postfix 2.10?

liblmdb is not yet available in Fedora, RHEL/CentOS. So I just created an RPM for RHEL6/CentOS6. Spec file attached. You can download the x86_64 RPMs & SRPM at http://pjl.home.xs4all.nl/downloads/liblmdb/ Regards, Patrick %define gitrev cbc4664 Name: liblmdb Version: 0 Release: 0.1.git%{gi

Re: Support for MDB in postfix 2.10?

tweb.cgi?p=openldap.git;a=commitdiff;h=13f3bcd59c2055d53e4759b0c3356b001eca44b0 So the correct name is lmdb (liblmdb.so and lmdb.h). Regards, Patrick

LDAP canonical_maps and domain rewriting

one could give me a hint or point me to some fine material to read how to make this work (if possible). Thanks and regards, Patrick

postfix / dkim: no signature for emails submitted through ssh tunnel

cessing of an email I feed through my email client on my workstation via an ssh tunnel are very different. On workstation side, I'm using an on demand tunnel, everything is piped into nc targeting localhost:25. Any idea that would allow DKIM to sign emails I'm sending via my ssh tunnel? Patrick

Re: LDAP canonical_maps and domain rewriting

Hi Fernando, On 03/16/2013 07:43 PM, Fernando Maior wrote: Hi Patrick, If you use the hash table, and issue the postmap command, what is the output? Here is the output: $ cat /etc/postfix/canonical @domainA.org@domainB.org $ postmap -q t...@domaina.org hash:/etc/postfix/canonical

Re: LDAP canonical_maps and domain rewriting

I would have guessed it does, but perhaps I overlooked something. You really should not do this. Instead take the high road: query_filter = mailDeliveryAddress=%s result = mail Will try that. Wildcard rewrites break recipient validation. Good to know. Thank you for your feedback. Regards, Patrick

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >