On 02/25/2013 07:19 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
FYI, in order to maintain Postfix in a meaningful manner I need to know what the library will look like on OTHER people's systems. Therefore I will wait until there is a package for a mainstream LINUX or *BSD distribution that OTHER people can install by typing one or two commands.
Got it. I'll see what it takes to get this RPM included in Fedora and EPEL. If accepted that would cover Fedora, RHEL and CentOS.
Howard's Postfix client code from a few months ago requires mdb.h and libmdb.*. On the other hand your SRPM appears to install lmdb.h and liblmdb.*. Is this the beginning of a Babylonian confusion? What names will real systems use?
Judging from the git commit log, on Nov 12, 2012 the "l" was added due to a naming conflict with other mdb* packages. See commit:
http://www.openldap.org/devel/gitweb.cgi?p=openldap.git;a=commitdiff;h=13f3bcd59c2055d53e4759b0c3356b001eca44b0
So the correct name is lmdb (liblmdb.so and lmdb.h). Regards, Patrick
