On 10/05/2025 14:09, Ken Biggs via Postfix-users wrote:
HI Nick,
I had cut and pasted from the "Raw Source" view in mac Mail, but double checked
in the spool file and those are the headers received in that order.
Thanks,
Ken
Thanks for confirming.
My set-up is very similar to yours, and (li
On 11/05/2025 07:45, Dmitriy Alekseev via Postfix-users wrote:
You can drop received header without dedicated postfix, just do it
with milter instead. Rspamd can do it for you with very small Lua
script, and do SPF/DKIM/DMARC & ARC all together.
This discussion has reminded me of an option tha
On 10/05/2025 15:29, Nick Tait via Postfix-users wrote:
But of course if the first scenario still exhibits the issue, then
that probably disproves my theory immediately?
Just thinking a bit more about this... If the first test fails, then you
can compare the headers and body in the received
On 10/05/2025 08:23, Ken Biggs via Postfix-users wrote:
Return-Path:
X-Original-To:x...@xxx.com
Delivered-To:y...@yyy.jkbiggs.com
Received: from mail-qk1-f169.google.com (mail-qk1-f169.google.com
[209.85.222.169])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
key-exchange X255
On 20/06/2025 08:35, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
This behavior is consistent with the postscreen code: the code that
logs the PREGREET event shows all available input, but does not
actually receive that input. The input is received, one line at a
time, by the postscreen dummy TLS engin
On 18/06/2025 22:33, Nick Tait via Postfix-users wrote:
Prior to making the configuration change, the response to the STARTTLS
was "454 4.7.0 TLS not available due to local problem", and the SMTP
session remained operational, meaning if the client then sent another
command (e.g. QUI
Hi there.
I hope this is the right forum for reporting a possible bug in
Postscreen? (Apologies if it isn't...)
I've been using Postscreen without "deep protocol tests" for a long
time, and it has been doing a fantastic job. I recently noticed a log
entry from Postscreen saying "warning: con
On 19/06/2025 02:53, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
Ditto for me:
$ (sleep 7; printf "EHLO foo.local\r\n"; sleep 2; printf "STARTTLS\r\n"; sleep 2;
printf "QUIT\r\n") | nc -C 127.0.0.1 24
220-amnesiac.example ESMTP Postfix
<...6s pause...>
220 amnesiac.example ESMT
