as well do it right, no?
The right way, as explained by Mike Paul in that ticket, would be to
call gethostbyname() on the return value of gethostname() and then split
the result of *that* into hostname and domainname.
Cheers, Moe
Wietse Venema wrote:
> Moe:
> [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
>> Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> Matt Hayes:
>>>> Yes.. I know this has come up quite a bit, but on freenode in #postfix
>>>> this discussion once again erupted when someone me
Wietse Venema wrote:
> Moe:
>> The right way, as explained by Mike Paul in that ticket, would be to
>> call gethostbyname() on the return value of gethostname() and then split
>> the result of *that* into hostname and domainname.
>
> That would be AN INCREDIBLY ST
order not to break backwards compatibility, how about
leaving the default behaviour as is, but introducing something like
'myhostname = $auto', 'mydomainname = $auto' (or whatever magic value
that can not be a real hostname) which then does the "full" hostname
detection the same way that 'hostname -f' does?
Cheers, Moe
Jan Kohnert wrote:
> Stan Hoeppner schrieb:
>> Jan Kohnert put forth on 6/3/2010 5:55 PM:
>>> Or let the Debian people write that patch for their version, as their
>>> users are apparently the only ones who comlain and such a fix could
>>> probably mess up more postfix-experienced users... ;)
>> Pl
Wietse Venema wrote:
> Moe:
>> The docs for 'myhostname' even explicitly state "The default is to use
>> the fully-qualified domain name from gethostname()", which makes no
>> sense as gethostname() does not normally return a FQDN.
>
> Only a brain-d
are such dependencies defined?
- --
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlOOYzoACgkQzTcr8Prq0ZNycwCgi8RnDVbKrUg1kMBjqbM5DsTL
egrep 't2'" produced no results, either.
- --
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlOOdJAACgkQzTcr8Prq0ZN2VACfYShZzwxB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/03/2014 05:07 PM, James Moe wrote:
> opensuse 13.1 postfix 2.9.6-7.4.1
>
> I recently upgraded a server from 12.3 to 13.1. Postfix worked
> correctly in v12.3.
>
The mount errors are spurious for loading Postfix, as some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/04/2014 04:38 AM, M. Rodrigo Monteiro wrote:
> The port bind seems to be a IPv6 issue. Is there some way to
> prevent that?
>
> inet_protocols = ipv4
>
Thank you. That has allowed Postfix to start.
- --
James Moe
moe dot
ng would solve this user issue.
--
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
Think.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ur custom header entry and does not call
rspamd if found?
--
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
Think.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tfix: running
postfix.service - Postfix Mail Transport Agent
[...]
- --
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iEYEARECAAYFAlTXACAACgkQzTcr8Prq0ZOLnQCffGGSSdDG7ZeQPfZ2J3EDKQfv
gecAnRNZLRJ/Dm5iboRt/RYA74GWOu+D
=I6lG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Those are the settings current in this installation.
- --
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iEYEARECAAYFAlTXn7IACgkQzTcr8Prq0ZOEmwCfdf1j8LNjJ9/PySk1YBkB2+NP
I1gAn2o1q4uE1oT2HiaMenlBoQjLw5Kl
=CfV+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
rop" queue sub-directory.
>
$ ll /usr/sbin/postdrop
- -rwxr-sr-x 1 root maildrop 15008 Sep 25 11:13 /usr/sbin/postdrop
$ ll /var/spool/postfix/maildrop
drwx-wx--- 1 postfix maildrop 0 Feb 7 16:29 maildrop
- --
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
-BEGIN PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/07/2015 11:20 PM, James Moe wrote:
> postdrop: warning: mail_queue_enter: create file
> maildrop/546331.4026: Permission denied
>
After checking the settings in main.cf and running "postifx
set-permissions," this pr
er.cf:smtp unix - - n - - smtp
master.cf:relay unix - - n - - smtp
master.cf: -o smtp_fallback_relay=
- [ end ]----
- --
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/25/2015 01:02 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> James Moe:
>
> Postfix logs all connections.
>
Where?
> Why do you think that Postfix is pinging hosts?
>
I first noticed the pings in the SMTP proxy logs. Further
investigat
e monitoring software? nagios? monit?
>
Suricata.
- --
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iEYEARECAAYFAlVkCAgACgkQzTcr8Prq0ZN2OwCfReyW0Pp5Vcfe6pj16IwSWUwF
9eEAoJItruNWW2Yr6GWazlR45C8akn3s
=1++T
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/25/2015 12:47 PM, James Moe wrote:
> Basically, Postfix is pinging the SMTP server to... do something?
> Verify the connection is still active? The ping occurs about every
> 5 minutes. There are four pings each time.
>
Found
r our main MTA:
250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN CRAM-MD5 DIGEST-MD5 GSSAPI
SASL has plugins installed for PLAIN, CRAM-MD5, DIGEST-MD5, and
GSSAPI; none are the 32-bit versions, though, and should not be needed.
It is probably a configuration error.
- --
Jame
s.cf lookup error for
"r...@sma-server3.sma.com"
2017-05-07T20:48:44-0700 sma-server3 postfix/cleanup[10270]: warning:
9AAFB15E206: virtual_alias_maps map lookup problem for
r...@sma-server3.sma.com -- message not accepted, try again later
-- James Moe moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com 520.743.3936 Think.
quit
No complaints here.
What is the problem?
Original-Recipient: rfc822;
Final-Recipient: rfc822;
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Remote-MTA: dns; postfix.org
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;host mail.cloud9.net says:
554 5.7.1 : Helo command rejected: Access denied
--
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-m
rd
localunix - n n -- local
virtual unix - n n -- virtual
lmtp unix - - n -- lmtp
anvilunix - - n - 1 anvil
--
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe
that I made recently and then forgot it.
And not understanding its implications, I failed to configure it properly.
Thank you all for your insight and support.
--
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
Think.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ot 70 Nov 13 03:05 ca-certificates/
$ ls -l /var/lib/ca-certificates/
dr-xr-xr-x 1 root root 17324 Nov 13 03:05 pem/
Any real directories are not group/other writable. Only the links have
the writable attributes.
Are the links what triggers the warning message?
--
James Moe
moe dot james at
is another one
in the path to the certificates. If I changed the one symlink in
postfix, would it still warn about the other symlink?
--
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
Think.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
smtpd_tls_received_header = no
--
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
Think.
2019-03-27T14:16:57-0700 sma-station14l postfix/smtp[19939]: smtp_stream_setup:
maxtime=300 enable_deadline=0
2019-03-27T14:16:57-0700 sma-station14l postfix/smtp[19939]:
vstream_buf_get_ready: fd 19 got
, including the password,
to the system journal.
How do I get postfix to stop doing that?
debug_peer_level = 1
--
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
Think.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
.cf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7597 Mar 26 13:51 /etc/postfix/master.cf
--
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
Think.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
the debug_peer_list parameter.
# debug_peer_level =
# The debug_peer_list parameter specifies an optional list of domain
# debug_peer_level parameter.
#debug_peer_list = 127.0.0.1
debug_peer_list = mail.sma.com
#debug_peer_list = example.com
#debug_peer_level = 3
--
James Moe
moe dot james a
On 09/04/2019 10.27 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> That's DEBUG-PEER-LIST, not DEBUG-PEER-LEVEL.
>
Ah. My confusion.
Had I set "debug_peer_level" to 0 (zero), would that have prevented
the verbose output as well?
--
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot c
On 09/04/2019 10.27 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> That's DEBUG-PEER-LIST, not DEBUG-PEER-LEVEL.
>
Yes, commenting the correct option works.
Thank you.
--
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
Think.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
y)
2019-04-16T07:23:02-0700 sma-station14l postfix/qmgr[10816]: A531515E50:
removed
--
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
Think.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ot;MAIL FROM" settings of your mail client and make sure you set the "MAIL 550
FROM" address to an email account which is hosted on the server. (in reply to
RCPT TO command))
[ end ]
--
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
Think.
_
. I am not clear why that is blank.
--
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
Think.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
tname" resolved this issue.
Thank you.
--
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
Think.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
37 matches
Mail list logo
