virtual MAILBOX: separate domains, non-UNIX accounts

Noip.com manages DNS for my FQDN. Should virtual_mailbox_domains = mail.example.com or only example.com Thanks for your help.

Re: virtual MAILBOX: separate domains, non-UNIX accounts

On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 6:17 AM, Magnus Bäck wrote: > On Monday, August 23, 2010 at 23:20 CEST, > Mike <1100...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Noip.com manages DNS for my FQDN. > > Should virtual_mailbox_domains = mail.example.com > > or only example.com >

Multiple Domains; No Local Accounts - bad uid in virtual_uid_maps

Incoming mail is getting dropped into /var/spool/postfix/defer . I'm seeing this error in /var/log/messages: Aug 24 17:21:48 sato postfix/virtual[581]: warning: recipient m...@example.com: bad uid example.com/mike/ 3001 3001 in virtual_uid_maps Aug 24 17:21:48 sato postfix/virtua

Re: Multiple Domains; No Local Accounts - bad uid in virtual_uid_maps

Thank you, gentlemen. I always appreciate a good "RTFM" from talented folks who actually know where they are pointing. :-) I do appreciate the help and definitely do not intend to aggravate and vex. Mike

virtual mailbox: separate domains, non-unix accounts

Trying to complete initial setup of postfix. My box is on a dynamic ip internet connection. I have a FQDN and DNS forwarding service through no-ip.com. I am starting with this one domain, and one virtual user. Thus far, postfix is not receiving mail and when I try send email by testing with "telne

Re: virtual mailbox: separate domains, non-unix accounts

Sahil, Thank you for your help. I created the virtual_alias_maps and now receive the expected response when initiating telnet session: ~:/var/spool# telnet localhost 25 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. 220 localhost ESMTP Postfix quit 221 2.0.0 Bye Connection

Re: virtual mailbox: separate domains, non-unix accounts

On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 10:01 PM, masegaloeh wrote: > Your problem was similiar to problem that i found in this link > http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0608/1215.html > > The solution is "Try turning off chroot operation in master.cf" > http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#no_chroot > -- >

Re: virtual mailbox: separate domains, non-unix accounts

On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 11:00 PM, masegaloeh wrote: > On 4/18/2011 8:28 AM, Mike wrote: >> >> I manually created the /var/spool/example.com/user1/  directories. >> I also applied directory ownership to: vmail:vmail > > why you create directory in /var/spool/example.c

Re: virtual mailbox: separate domains, non-unix accounts

On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Mike <1100...@gmail.com> wrote: > ~# ls -la /var/spool/vmailbox > total 12 > drwxr-xr-x  3 1001 vmail 4096 2011-04-17 12:19 ./ > drwxr-xr-x 17 root root  4096 2011-04-17 12:03 ../ > drwxr-xr-x  3 1001 vmail 4096 2011-04-17 13:39 example.com/ &

Postfix w/TLS, virtual domain, non-unix account

I've got postfix working with TLS in a virtual domain configuration. The postfix server is accepting mail with no problems; per log: Apr 26 06:05:23 sato postfix/smtpd[26962]: connect from mail-iy0-f180.google.com[209.85.210.180] Apr 26 06:05:23 sato postfix/smtpd[26962]: setting up TLS connection

Re: Postfix w/TLS, virtual domain, non-unix account

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > > This is all that would be logged with "smtpd_tls_loglevel = 1", and it > is quite sufficient. Excellent, will do and thanks for letting me know I'm now ready to configure an imap server. Mike

Re: high-speed postfix configuration

> The first thing that comes to mind is using a ramdisk for the queue directories. > But I'm doubting Postfix will work with queue directories on a ramdisk. Wietse can answer this. There's no reason Postfix won't work with /var/spool/postfix mounted from RAM. The standard filesystem(s) used

Re: Reverse Hostnames with '_msdcs' not valid

On 12-08-29 08:01 AM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: We suspect (and verified with an internal client with custom rDNS) that the _msdcs entry is at fault. This hostname does not seem to get accepted. As soon as I remove the '_' it works fine. Have a read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hostname#Res

Odd postfix and firewall log entries

I recently started seeing these log entries in the Postfix log and the firewall log. The sequence happens once a day, sometimes twice. Each time it appears to be a different client IP address. In summary, I see an aborted connection attempt to Postfix, then a short while later I see Postfix tryi

Re: Odd postfix and firewall log entries

On 10/1/2012 at 3:35 PM Viktor Dukhovni wrote: |On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 11:05:59AM -0400, Mike. wrote: | |> I recently started seeing these log entries in the Postfix log and the |> firewall log. The sequence happens once a day, sometimes twice. Each |> time it appears to be a differe

Postscreen status script

I implemented the postscreen capability on a small MTA I run for friends and family. Once I got postscreen configuration producing the results I wanted, I soon tired of watching the detailed maillog to see how postscreen was operating. So I wrote a quick shell script to summarize the log file an

Re: Postscreen status script

On 1/29/2013 at 1:14 PM Brian Evans wrote: |On 1/29/2013 1:07 PM, Mike. wrote: |> I implemented the postscreen capability on a small MTA I run for |> friends and family. Once I got postscreen configuration producing the |> results I wanted, I soon tired of watching the detailed maill

Re: Postscreen status script

On 1/29/2013 at 1:43 PM Brian Evans wrote: |On 1/29/2013 1:29 PM, Mike. wrote: |> |> On 1/29/2013 at 1:14 PM Brian Evans wrote: |> |> |On 1/29/2013 1:07 PM, Mike. wrote: |> |> I implemented the postscreen capability on a small MTA I run for |> |> friends and family

Re: Postscreen status script

On 1/29/2013 at 2:01 PM Brian Evans wrote: |On 1/29/2013 1:43 PM, Brian Evans wrote: |> Because of that, I have skewed numbers: |> All "incoming" log records: 10187 |> All "status=sent" log records: 7506 |> All "status=deferred" log records: 3302 |> rejected: -621 (-6%) |> |> It is not a simple

Re: Postscreen status script

On 1/29/2013 at 2:06 PM lcon...@go2france.com wrote: |On Tuesday 29/01/2013 at 1:37 pm, Mike. wrote: |> |I suggest you simplify and use only postscreen log lines. | |"sent" and "deferred" are not postscreen actions. | |and "sent" double counts when postfix sends

Re: Postscreen status script

On 1/30/2013 at 3:55 AM Eliezer Croitoru wrote: |On 1/29/2013 8:07 PM, Mike. wrote: |> |> I implemented the postscreen capability on a small MTA I run for |> friends and family. Once I got postscreen configuration producing the |> results I wanted, I soon tired of watching the deta

Postscreen status script, take two

I made some changes to the script based upon the excellent feedback I received here. The script no longer wanders beyond the postscreen log records in order to gather the information needed to determine the postscreen rejection rate. So that removes the problems caused by multiple-recipient m

Re: Postscreen status script, take two

On 2/2/2013 at 9:52 AM Sahil Tandon wrote: |On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 14:23:19 -0500, Mike. wrote: | |> I made some changes to the script based upon the excellent feedback I |> received here. |> |> The script no longer wanders beyond the postscreen log records in |> order to gather

Re: Postscreen status script, take two

On 2/2/2013 at 9:52 AM Sahil Tandon wrote: |Be careful with grep(1) patterns. You overstate CONNECTs by |including 'NOQUEUE: reject: CONNECT' in the count. I tightened up that regex to include only the CONNECT occurrences I want. | Meanwhile, the script | understates total DNSBL rejections

Re: quiet or broken

On 3/11/2013 at 8:28 PM Wietse Venema wrote: |Either it has become very quiet here, or something has broken. | | Wietse = Quiet here. I'm just sitting back and watching Postfix do its thing. Thanks!

google outbound SMTP whitelisting

I wanted to put google's outbound SMTP servers on a postscreen whitelist, but the list seems to be dynamic. I found this web page that explains how to get the list of IP addresses: http://support.google.com/a/bin/answer.py?hl=en&hlrm=de&answer=60764 So I wrote a quick script that outputs to stdo

Re: google outbound SMTP whitelisting

On 5/20/2013 at 3:14 PM Benny Pedersen wrote: |Mike. skrev den 2013-05-19 21:08: | |> Comments are welcome. | |wishfull thinking here: make postscreen postfix policy compatible = That's beyond the scope of the project. :) More seriously, if I were to integrate it more

Re: performance of postfix

On 13-05-22 07:53 AM, Selcuk Yazar wrote: Hi, we have Postfix with LDAP backend , everything is working good but i think we have some performance issues , but i can't sure :/ ( Our mailbox folders are located Storage Drive mapped at Redhat Enterprise) Have you looked at your logs to dete

Re: Is it time for 2.x.y -> x.y?

On 5/31/2013 at 4:56 PM wie...@porcupine.org wrote: |After the confusion that Postfix 2.10 is not Postfix 2.1, = In 20/20 hindsight, perhaps Postfix 2.1 should have been Postfix 2.01, allowing 100 minor versions before the major version was forced to change. I have a similar pro

Re: Is it time for 2.x.y -> x.y?

On 5/31/2013 at 10:23 PM Jim Wright wrote: |On May 31, 2013, at 3:56 PM, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote: | |> After the confusion that Postfix 2.10 is not Postfix 2.1, maybe it is |time to change the release numbering scheme. | |If they can't figure it out, they shouldn't be running

Re: monitoring with Icinga?

On 13-06-02 12:34 PM, Lars Nielsen wrote: My primary use is to recieve emails for my domains. Next I want to relay general emails for a limited amount of authenticated users. Ok, so with step one, you're going to want to have another system send email to a mailbox you host once every 'n' min

Re: Monitoring

On 13-07-17 09:14 AM, Roman Gelfand wrote: > Is there open source web based postfix server monitoring software? > > I am looking to see if there is something to monitor queue size, etc... > > Thanks in advance Nagios has a "check_mailq" plugin that works very well with Postfix. -- Looking for (

Re: ..:: Keep HTML format ::.. (solved)

On 9/4/2013 at 11:32 AM Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez wrote: |On 9/4/13 11:08 AM, Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez wrote: |>> Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez wrote: |>>> Thanks for the response, the thing is that if you send an email on the |>>> same exchange everything looks fine, if you se

Re: Postfix Repos

I asked this under a thread but am asking again in its own thread to see if I get better visibility. Does anyone know of any good bleeding edge postfix repos? I am using whatever the CentOS distros come with and it appears to be an older version. I¹d like to look into some of the newer features

Re: Postfix doubling up as SMTP load balancer

In $PREVIOUSJOB, we had a number of internet facing SMTP machines, which looked up accounts/mailboxes/transport maps etc from MySQL; all changes were done on a master database on a separate machine, and synced out with MySQL replication to all of the SMTP machines. This way we could take any single

Postfix -> bogofilter -> Dovecot -> Sieve

ideas that you might have to accomplish this. Mike.

Re: Some DNSSEC/DANE questions

On 1/3/2022 2:38 PM, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote: >[snip] > > One more question: Does anyone know of a "reflector" like service that one > can use to test DANE validation, i.e. a site that one is allowed to send > test messages to, that *only* has DANE as the trust mech (so, say, a > self-signed

Re: OpenDKIM

On 11/7/2015 9:09 AM, Steve Jenkins wrote: > On Saturday, November 7, 2015, John Allen > wrote: > > Interesting! > I tried a couple of DKIM test sites, one says I am signing my > emails, the other says I am not!! > Mailradar say I am not signing! > DKIMVal

Re: DANE statistics

On 12/10/2015 9:29 AM, Dirk Stöcker wrote: > Hello, > > does anyone here have statistics about DANE enabled mail servers? And > maybe also a timeline showing an increase (hopefully)? I'm running DANE > for some time now and I don't ever get a Verified connection (except to my > second server).

Re: WoSign/StartCom CA in the news

On 9/28/2016 4:55 AM, li...@lazygranch.com wrote: > CACert came up in my search. I will look into it. Suggestions always > appreciated since I'm quite comfortable with people out there knowing more > than me. > > I didn't like the Let's Encrypt 90 day deal with mysterious upload to your > serve

Re: WoSign/StartCom CA in the news

On 9/28/2016 10:53 AM, KSB wrote: > On 2016.09.28. 17:47, Mike wrote: >> On 9/28/2016 4:55 AM, li...@lazygranch.com wrote: >>> CACert came up in my search. I will look into it. Suggestions always >>> appreciated since I'm quite comfortable with people out

postscreen log scanner script updated

I cleaned up my pslogscan.sh script a bit. Aside from some general cleanup, I did some re-formatting of the output to make it look a bit cleaner, and allow for some flexibility in display widths. I also went from linear processing of multiple items to loop processing of those items. You can do

Re: postscreen log scanner script updated

On 9/29/2014 at 10:44 AM Mike. wrote: |I cleaned up my pslogscan.sh script a bit. Aside from some general |cleanup, I did some re-formatting of the output to make it look a bit |cleaner, and allow for some flexibility in display widths. I also |went from linear processing of multiple items to

Re: Goodbye IBM, Hello Google

o say, I will continue to support Postfix. | | Wietse = Sincere congratulations, and the best of the future for you at Google! Mike.

Re: postfix stats

On 5/7/2015 at 11:09 AM Alex Regan wrote: |Hi, | |>> I've been using pflogsumm but it's old and doesn't know about |>> postscreen. I'd like to see how many connections are being refused by |>> postscreen. What do you like? logwatch? awstats? other? |>> |> |> http://logreporters.sourceforge.net/

Exploring DANE and Postfix

Postfix 2.11.5 on FreeBSD 10.1 AMD64 I'm starting to look at implementing DANE on Postfix, and I have a question or two... Reading the info here: http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html#client_tls_dane I see the following prerequisite: "A compile-time DNS resolver library that supports DNSSEC. Po

Re: Exploring DANE and Postfix

On 7/26/2015 2:06 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 01:50:58PM -0400, Mike wrote: [snip] > >> Is there a way to see if this prerequisite has been satisfied by the >> version of Postfix I am running on my system. > > Send mail to one of the known

Re: Exploring DANE and Postfix

On 7/26/2015 2:11 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: [snip] > > Postfix needs to be build on a system where libresolv supports > DNSSEC. This is already available in a FreeBSD 7.2 virtual machine > that I have lying around. I'm running on FreeBSD 10.1, and it looks fine. Many thanks for the comments.

Re: Exploring DANE and Postfix

On 7/26/2015 2:11 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Mike: >> Postfix 2.11.5 on FreeBSD 10.1 AMD64 >> >> I'm starting to look at implementing DANE on Postfix, and I have a >> question or two... >> >> Reading the info here: >> http://www.postfix.org/TLS_REA

Re: Exploring DANE and Postfix

On 7/31/2015 11:54 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:47:55AM -0400, Mike wrote: > >> To test the server's configuration, I found this site: >> https://dane.sys4.de/ >> that lets me know if Postfix server DANE (along with DNSSEC and TLSA) is &g

Forward Secrecy in the Postfix SMTP Client

On this page: http://www.postfix.org/FORWARD_SECRECY_README.html#client_fs There is: Once the parameters are in place, update main.cf as follows: /etc/postfix/main.cf: smtpd_tls_dh1024_param_file = ${config_directory}/dh2048.pem smtpd_tls_dh512_param_file = ${config_dire

Re: Forward Secrecy in the Postfix SMTP Client

On 8/9/2015 12:48 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 12:42:00PM -0400, Mike wrote: > >> On this page: >> http://www.postfix.org/FORWARD_SECRECY_README.html#client_fs >> >> There is: >> >> Once the parameters are in place, update

Re: Postfix 20 years ago

On 2/12/2017 1:06 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Last month it was 20 years ago that I started writing Postfix code. Many thanks for the amazing Postfix. The quality and functionality of the software is among the best. Mike.

Re: postscreen log summary

On 7/24/2017 12:12 PM, Scott Techlist wrote: > Anyone have or know of a log parser/tool that includes postscreen logs? I > don't think Jim's pflogsum includes any type of postscreen data. > > Would be nice to have some reporting that included how much I'm potentially > preventing vs. processing.

Re: Letsencrypt tip

On 9/11/2017 5:21 AM, Dominic Raferd wrote: > > > On 11 September 2017 at 11:59, Gary > wrote: > > As you know, letsencrypt certs can be automatically updated. > However, you need to reload/restart Postfix/Dovecot to use the new > cert. My email client i

Re: rsyslogd and postfix

On 4/25/2018 2:08 PM, @lbutlr wrote: > This might be of use to others out there. I decided that monitoring mail.log > was too much of a pain with all the postscreen and dnsblog 'noise' from > obscuring the information that I wanted to see, so I split those log events > into their own log file us

Re: rsyslogd and postfix

On 4/26/2018 3:08 PM, @lbutlr wrote: > On 2018-04-26 (06:46 MDT), Mike wrote: >> >> I have a similar log strategy but I let postfix do it for me. >> >> For example, my postscreen entry in master.cf is: >> >> >> smtp inet n -

Re: Understanding the importance of submission

On 3/20/2019 11:39 AM, Ralph Seichter wrote: > * Yassine Chaouche: > >> So the only thing that I need submission port for seems to be to force >> TLS connexions, right ? > > You already mentioned having different policies, so the possibilities > are numerous. Having the dedicated submission port

Postfix can not bind to address (IP)

want to implement SPF and it fails. I tried to set: smtp_bind_address = x.x.x.10 inet_interfaces = x.x.x.10, 127.0.0.1 And I get the error: fatal: parameter inet_interfaces: no local interface found for x.x.x.10 Any help and suggestion are highly appreciated. thanks, Mike

Re: Postfix can not bind to address (IP)

Thanks for helping me with this - you're right! On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Mike Pogue: >> You're right, the ip set on smtp_bind_address was wrong. Updated this >> and restarted postfix. >> >> Got an error related to clamsmptp

Restrict delivery of mail to some addresses to local senders

Sorry for this simple and probably already asked question but I couldn't find any answer anyway... How to restrict delivery of mail to some addresses (especially local aliases) to senders from local domains only? e.g. I would like only senders from @mycompany.com to be allowed to send a message

relaying from localhost

nt to relay all mail originating from the webserver on localhost. If what we're trying to do is very bad practice, we'll come up with another solution. But if there's no problem with it in principle, can anyone offer any hints for how to set it up? Many thanks, Mike.

Re: relaying from localhost

Hi Magnus, Thanks for replying. > > If that is the case, why isn't mydestination empty? You have emptied > local_recipient_maps, but this means that all addresses are accepted > (and then possibly bounced, which is bad). > Because I was getting messages in the logs like this, and /var/spool/cl

Re: relaying from localhost

On Sunday 07 June 2009 09:14:24 mouss wrote: > > maybe be because you forgot to put that domain under relay_domains. > Ah, right, yes. Thanks! > > you don't have permit_mynetworks here. and btw, the order of your checks > is dubious. > > smtpd_recipient_restrictions = > reject_non_fqdn_r

Rate control for SMTP delivery to speicific domain

Hello Everyone. Our company sends out newsletters to people who have subscribed their mail address in-store (retail). I have been working in attempt to slow down E-Mail deliveries to Hotmail, as our server attempts deliveries too quickly and will get blocked by their servers. I have googled and

RE: Rate control for SMTP delivery to speicific domain

> > > > smtphotmail unix - - - - 3 > smtp > > Who told you to set a wakeup timer of 3 seconds? Remove it. No-one did. I had intended to set a max processes limit.. As I understand it, this would be setting the Max Processes limit. smtphotmail unix

RE: Rate control for SMTP delivery to speicific domain

in > > On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Mike Hutchinson wrote: > > > As I understand it, this would be setting the Max Processes limit. > > smtphotmail unix- - - - 3 smtp > > That is how you set maxproc, but why do you need 3 for this transpor

RE: Rate control for SMTP delivery to speicific domain

> > > > What version of Postfix is this? > > > > Postfix mail_version = 2.5.1 > > The rate control features introduced in 2.5.0 were improved in later > patches, you must upgrade to the latest 2.5 release if you want to > enforce inter-message delays. > Sounds interesting. I shall investigate a

RE: Rate control for SMTP delivery to speicific domain

> > > >>> And setting the wakeup timer would be like this: > >>> smtphotmail unix- - - 3 - smtp > >> > >> That is how you set the timer. > > > > Yes, not what I am doing / want to do. > > > >>> My apologies. Ill go back and start from scratch. > >> > >> What

RE: Rate control for SMTP delivery to speicific domain

> >> > >> What version of Postfix is this? > > > > Postfix mail_version = 2.5.1 > > That's what I suspected. Upgrade; see RELEASE_NOTES for > destination_rate_delay fix last year. Also show logs confirming your > special transport is actually being used. Excellent. Sounds like I have my answer.

Patch: support BURL

Hello Postfix community, Attached please find a patch that adds support to postfix-2.7.0 for RFC 4468 - Submission BURL. BURL requires a pre-configured trust relationship between the submission server and the IMAP server. This patch adds a new configuration file normally named "submit.cred" that

Re: Patch: support BURL

Thank you for pointing out that I did not explain the contents of the submit.cred file well enough. This file contains a single username and password per IMAP server which postfix uses to authenticate to that IMAP server. Typically the username is "submit". It does NOT contain regular users'

Re: Patch: support BURL

>> +if (in_stream == NULL) { >> +/* must fail the entire transaction */ >> +chat_reset(state, var_smtpd_hist_thrsh); >> +mail_reset(state); >> +rcpt_reset(state); >> +return -1; >> +} > > Why no response to the client? The function imap_open() respo

Re: Patch: support BURL

> In the mean time, the authors may want to enforce strict sanity > checks on IMAP server output such as the reply payload length, and > also make sure that their vstream_limit code behaves when reads > are alternated with writes (either refuse to allow read/write/read, > or enforce the limit as pr

Re: Patch: support BURL

> How would this work for messages that are never saved to the Drafts folder? Then instead the message could be saved to the Sent folder instead, and the submission server could fetch it from there. The MUA would have to remove it from the Sent folder if sending failed, of course. Nothing magi

Re: Patch: support BURL

> This interpretation is incorrect, the 3-digit SMTP code, must match the > 3-part DSN code. For transient errors use 454. Thank you.

Re: rate limit issue

a year since we set it up). > Do you realize the entries you just posted are misspelled domains? They are not sbcglobal.net, comcast.net, or earthlink.net. -Mike

Mail to local domains

Hello all, I am writing to ask for a procedure for sending a broadcast E-Mail to locally hosted domains on a postfix system. Currently we use postfixadmin for this, but this is undesirable as it will often double-up or triple-up entire sends (we intend to fix this, eventually). I know the

RE: Mail to local domains

> > Currently we use postfixadmin for this, but this is undesirable as it will > > often double-up or triple-up entire sends (we intend to fix this, > > eventually). I know the previous system we used was basically a script that > > copied a file into everyone's Inbox under their Maildir folder - w

RE: dealing with Yahoo slowness

> -Original Message- > Florin Andrei a écrit : > > There seems to be a massive difference between the speed of various > > providers, in terms of accepting messages for delivery. Yahoo stands out > > as, by far, the slowest of the big ones. > > > > Because the messages are legitimate, we si

RE: dealing with Yahoo slowness

> > # Slow these destinations to avoid blacklisting, see /etc/postfix/transport > > for domains configured > > hotmail_destination_concurrency_limit = 2 > > hotmail_destination_rate_delay = 2s > > hotmail_destination_recipient_limit = 5 > > yahoo_destination_concurrency_limit = 4 > > yahoo_destinat

RE: dealing with Yahoo slowness

> -Original Message- > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix- > us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Florin Andrei > Sent: Tuesday, 15 June 2010 6:00 a.m. > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: Re: dealing with Yahoo slowness > > On 0

Separate Submission Instance on Same IP as MX

fix-submission instance, the "smtp inet ... smtpd" entry is commented out, and "submission inet ... smtpd" is enabled. Thanks, Mike

Re: Separate Submission Instance on Same IP as MX

On 08/01/2010 02:37 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: > On 08/01/2010 04:11 AM, Mike Morris wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm working on a mail server deployment that will only have one server >> for MX and SASL submission purposes. Generally I like to have separate >> Postf

Re: Separate Submission Instance on Same IP as MX

On 08/01/2010 09:29 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Mike Morris: >> Hi, >> >> I'm working on a mail server deployment that will only have one server >> for MX and SASL submission purposes. Generally I like to have separate >> Postfix instances to handle a specific

Re: Separate Submission Instance on Same IP as MX

On 08/05/2010 11:57 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: > On 08/01/2010 08:42 PM, Mike Morris wrote: >> On 08/01/2010 02:37 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: >> >>> On 08/01/2010 04:11 AM, Mike Morris wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I

Re: I think that thing smtpd_recipient_restrictions does not work

hecks.pcre file returns an OK when the RHS of an email address is anything for an LHS of postmater, hostmaster, and abuse, and it immediately precedes reject_unauth_destination in smtpd_recipient_restrictions. What is the purpose of configuring recipient validation in such a manner? The OP would be better served by correctly configuring the proper address classes. -Mike

Re: I think that thing smtpd_recipient_restrictions does not work

On 01/21/2011 05:25 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > On 1/21/2011 7:13 PM, Mike Morris wrote: >> On 01/21/2011 04:56 PM, Noel Jones wrote: >>> On 1/21/2011 5:08 PM, Condor wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> i have postfix 2.7.2 and i have problem with restri

Re: I think that thing smtpd_recipient_restrictions does not work

n 'OK' or 'permit' result prior to those checks. Maybe it's time you provided your current postconf -n output, as well as the full contents of access maps you're using. Also, replacing your 'OK' results in your access maps with permit_auth_destination may be safer in case you accidentally move them after reject_unauth_destination again in the future. -Mike

relay_recipient and/or relay_domains issue

I have two issues that I believe are connected so I'm putting them into one submission to the list: ISSUE 1 I want to forward root's mail to a local user called mike. The user's email address is m...@ascendency.net and is a legitimate use

Re: relay_recipient and/or relay_domains issue

On Feb 15, 2011, at 3:45 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: > On 02/15/2011 07:07 PM, Mike Loiterman wrote: >> I have two issues that I believe are connected so I'm putting them into one >> submission to the list: >> >> >> ISSUE 1 >> =

Re: relay_recipient and/or relay_domains issue

On Feb 15, 2011, at 4:08 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: > On 02/15/2011 10:56 PM, Mike Loiterman wrote: >> On Feb 15, 2011, at 3:45 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: >> >> >>> On 02/15/2011 07:07 PM, Mike Loiterman wrote: >>> >>>> I have two issu

Re: postscreen test

e or if you have issues w/the French: postcull postreject postdiscard --- Mike

Re: postscreen test

tp versus smtpd. If there exists a different By itself, it is not. I'd suggest that increasing the number of support questions for little gain is not prudent. Uniquely distinct names have value. my 2c. --- Mike

Re: postscreen test

On 7/16/09 6:02 PM, Noel Jones wrote: postquack (like water off a ducks back) But I can't beat prefix. I like prefix too; that Ralf is very clever. postfix/postprefix might twist one's mind. Or, go biblical: postsmite. ;-) Good fun.

Re: postscreen test

gt; both words above are more in the tradition of describing what the program >> does >> e.g. pickup, cleanup, tlsmgr etc. which I actually like very much about >> Postfix naming convention. >> > "screener", then. > Oh, wait ... > > > but then, there is also "anvil" > > J.L. > "Anvil" is a name I always liked for a Postfix daemon, and I was also thinking that building on that theme would be a good idea. However, I'm not clever enough to come up with an example. "Vise" was all that I could come up with. -Mike

Re: allow sasl authenticated on submission port and bypass rbl

On 8/3/09 12:26 AM, Nick Sharp wrote: Hi all, Since adding check_sender_access to stop our domain from emailing unauthed from the outside and our Wireless Broadband now being in the pbl.spamhaus.org list, we want to allow TLS/SASL Auth'd users to email from their broadband cards and get them byp

Re: HELO/EHLO rejection rate

and direct comparison against the other tools would help clarify any confusion. -- Mike

Re: error message

erstand this message? If it's postfix, which database needs updating, and how do I do it? If it's logwatch, please tell me, and I apologize for wasting your time... -- Mike

Re: error message

On 9/11/09 5:05 PM, ghe wrote: On Sep 11, 2009, at 5:51 PM, Mike Cappella wrote: I don't understand this line from today's logwatch report: 308 *Warning: Database file needs update This message appears when you have a map file that requires postmap'ing to bring the db

  1   2   3   >