Is it possible to make a header_checks rule apply only to a certain client?
I've got an annoying piece of software which sends messages through Postfix.
This software insists on including a "Sender" header that I wish to filter out
with Postfix, but only for this certain client (or the envelope s
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:28:03 +0100, Terry Carmen wrote:
> Martin Strand wrote:
>> Is it possible to make a header_checks rule apply only to a certain client?
>>
>> I've got an annoying piece of software which sends messages through Postfix.
>> This software insist
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:22:42 +0100, Noel Jones wrote:
>> No, it's only the "Sender" *header* that's causing problems, not the actual
>> envelope sender.
>> I added an IGNORE line to filter out all Sender headers, but I would prefer
>> to only apply that filter to this specific client.
>> After r
At my company we're doing almost the exact same thing.
FOr this we use Postfix on RHEL5 with MySQL for domains, users and aliases.
With about ~10k accounts everything works great except the forwarding vs SPF
problem, ie:
1. someu...@hotmail.com sends a message to i...@yourcustomer.com
2. your ser
On Mon, 18 May 2009 03:48:54 +0200, Carlos Williams
wrote:
> I find it confusing to know / understand what
> configurations Postfix auto assumes and what is required to be
> specified in my main.cf.
>
> Can someone please shed some light on this for me?
Use postconf -d to see the default value:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:00:21 +0100, J.D. Bronson
wrote:
I have noticed (at times) that sometimes email gets greylisted
when the user doesn't exist in my system. The mail ultimately get's
rejected, but I cant figure out why it's greylisting when it's invalid
to begin with? Greylisting, to me..s
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:20:56 +0200, Wietse Venema
wrote:
Eduardo Júnior:
But my box Postfix provides mail services to many domains and I created
a only SSL certificate with the name server as Common Name.
And I get many warnings because the Common Name in the certificate
doesn't match
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:23:29 +0200, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz
wrote:
> But I wonder if any of you knows about a beggning manual for dummy sysadmins
> to let them to work with already postfix installation.
I think the architecture overview gives a pretty good idea of how it all works:
http://www.
You could add another mysql alias map:
[main.cf]
virtual_alias_maps = proxy:mysql:/path/to/virtual_alias_maps
[virtual_alias_maps]
query = select 'supportst...@isp.ltd'
from your_virtual_domains
where '%u' in ('postmaster', 'abuse', 'any-other-local-part')
and domain =
Yes, you can use certificate authentication instead of a password.
However, this has absolutely nothing to do with Postfix.
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:03:02 +0100, Alejandro Esteban Galvez
wrote:
Hi! I want known if exist any command of direct ssh connection. The means of
this, is a command wher
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 10:30:47 +0100, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre
wrote:
You could too take a look to Postfix Quota Reject.
http://postfixquotareject.ramattack.net. It's a postfix policy daemon
which allow mail to be rejected at smtp dialogue when mailbox are
overquota... can work from the own mai
Hi all.
I'm looking to implement an auto-response mechanism which:
- only sends responses to senders who pass SPF checks
- responds from certain virtual aliases as well as certain virtual users
- doesn't respond to mailing lists
- finds the response message/subject through mysql
- supports per-rec
On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:24:33 +0100, Robert Schetterer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martin Strand schrieb:
Hi all.
I'm looking to implement an auto-response mechanism which:
- only sends responses to senders who pass SPF checks
- responds from certain virtual aliases as well as cert
We're an email service provider hosting ~3000 domains. Customers can delegate
their domains to our nameservers and administer email accounts with a web
interface.
I figured it would be a good idea to reserve the postmaster@ and abuse@
addresses for hosted domains and forward them to our own pos
On Sat, 08 Nov 2008 03:58:25 +0100, Gerald V. Livingston II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Martin Strand wrote:
>> We're an email service provider hosting ~3000 domains. Customers can
>> delegate their domains to our nameservers and administer email
>> accoun
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:14:56 +0100, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Horne wrote:
>>
>> At least a couple of times per year, some large mail provider makes me
>> jump through their hoops to get my users' mail to them (bellsouth/at&t
>> after the merger was a nightmare), but you know what? I
16 matches
Mail list logo
