I had a user that has a 3G data dongle and we found that their messages were
being discarded. SpamAssassin was identifying the sender IP as from a DUL and
assigned a very high score. I realized that I had not set the content-filter to
be excluded for submission users, so I went and did that in m
On Nov 19, 2009, at 2:39 PM, Jay wrote:
> I had a user that has a 3G data dongle and we found that their messages were
> being discarded. SpamAssassin was identifying the sender IP as from a DUL and
> assigned a very high score. I realized that I had not set the content-filter
sue? Or is it possibly a problem somewhere
else, i.e. with the `mail` command? Where can I begin to look to troubleshoot
this further? What configuration info can I provide that might help? A full
dump of `postconf -n`? All of master.cf?
Thank you,
Jay
> On 10 Mar 2020, at 2:02 pm, Noel Jones wrote:
>
> On 3/9/2020 9:09 PM, Jay wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>> I’m having a strange situation on one of my macOS X Servers (10.13.6)
>> running postfix 3.1.1.
>> The server is configured to only use virtual_domains and virtu
> On 11 Mar 2020, at 3:33 am, Noel Jones wrote:
>
> On 3/10/2020 12:03 AM, Jay wrote:
>>> On 10 Mar 2020, at 2:02 pm, Noel Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> On 3/9/2020 9:09 PM, Jay wrote:
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>> I’m having a strange situation
tion failed; cannot authenticate to server
>> smtp.gmail.com[74.125.47.109]: no mechanism available
>> Feb 11 18:23:18 nagios postfix/smtp[22560]: private/defer socket: wanted
>> attribute: status
>> Feb 11 18:23:18 nagios postfix/smtp[22560]: vstream_fflush_some: fd 15 flush
>> 377
>> Feb 11 18:23:18 nagios postfix/smtp[22560]: vstream_buf_get_ready: fd 15 got
>> 10
>> Feb 11 18:23:18 nagios postfix/smtp[22560]: input attribute name: status
>> Feb 11 18:23:18 nagios postfix/smtp[22560]: input attribute value: 0
>> Feb 11 18:23:18 nagios postfix/smtp[22560]: private/defer socket: wanted
>> attribute: (list terminator)
>> Feb 11 18:23:18 nagios postfix/smtp[22560]: input attribute name: (end)
>> Feb 11 18:23:18 nagios postfix/smtp[22560]: 83BA05EE905:
>> to=, relay=smtp.gmail.com[74.125.47.109]:587,
>> delay=1526, delays=1526/0.04/0.78/0, dsn=4.7.0, status=deferred (SASL
>> authentication failed; cannot authenticate to server
>> smtp.gmail.com[74.125.47.109]: no mechanism available)
-- Always glad to help,
--Jay Bendon - Bendon Consults
, dsn=4.7.0, status=deferred (SASL
authentication failed; cannot authenticate to server
smtp.gmail.com[74.125.47.109]: no mechanism available)
-- Always glad to help,
--Jay Bendon - Bendon Consults
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jay Bendon:
>> I setup a nagios s
rname = no
smtp_tls_key_file = /etc/pki/tls/gmail_relay/gmail.key
smtp_tls_note_starttls_offer = yes
smtp_tls_scert_verifydepth = 5
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtpd_tls_ask_ccert = yes
smtpd_tls_req_ccert = no
tls_random_source = dev:/dev/urandom
unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550
-- Always glad to help,
--
Thanks Wietse,
I used what was recommended by the readme and that resulted in the
same error. I also tried a few other settings in there and no better
results.
-- Always glad to help,
--Jay Bendon - Bendon Consults
-Senior Engineer
+1-402-321-7388
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Wietse
:/dev/urandom
unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550
end
-- Always glad to help,
--Jay Bendon - Bendon Consults
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> > Postfix also logged this message, amidst your
n n - - pipe
flags=Fq. user=foo argv=/usr/local/sbin/bsmtp -f $sender $nexthop $recipient
-- mechanisms on smtp.gmail.com:587 --
-- mechanisms on [smtp.gmail.com]:587 --
-- mechanisms on smtp.gmail.com --
-- end of saslfinger output --
end
-- Always glad to help,
--
That fixed it!
Thanks so much for your help Wietse.
-- Always glad to help,
--Jay Bendon - Bendon Consults
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jay Bendon:
>> -- listing of /usr/lib64/sasl2 --
>> total 2748
>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Feb 10 19:
Everything is built inhouse and guarded very closely. U will not be able to
duplicate their product without significant financial investment or just use
their product.
On Oct 19, 2010 10:27 PM, "Julio Cesar Covolato" wrote:
Hi!
I wonder know what system Gmail use. They use postfix as mta? I
We currently have a postfix MX front-end that uses MailScanner, clamav,
and spamassassin to preprocess incoming email. We use LDAP lookups to
determine valid recipients. Email that makes it through all of that
gets moved to a Cyrus imap mailstore using LMTP
(mailbox_transport = lmtp:cyrusimap
ak current setups.
I'm definitely interested in any technical reasons why a patricia/radix
trie is *not* currently implemented. Contrary to that, would anyone
else be interested in this as a feature request?
As always, thanks for all the hard work everyone puts into Postfix. It
is greatly
ction, but I can say for sure that it
doesn't work.
Jay
--
Jay Deiman
\033:wq!
I have a primary SMTP-server that receives for domain.tld (duuuh) and it stores
it in Maildirs.
I also want to forward every mail received for the domain to another server that
will do the exact same thing.
I know that i can forward mail to another address via the virtual_mailbox_maps
file but i
On 2011-09-09 01:17, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jay Ess:
I have a primary SMTP-server that receives for domain.tld (duuuh)
and it stores it in Maildirs. I also want to forward every mail
received for the domain to another server that will do the exact
same thing.
Use pcre-based recipient_bcc_maps
On 2011-09-09 02:00, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jay Ess:
On 2011-09-09 01:17, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jay Ess:
I have a primary SMTP-server that receives for domain.tld (duuuh)
and it stores it in Maildirs. I also want to forward every mail
received for the domain to another server that will do the
On 2011-09-09 02:06, Noel Jones wrote:
Use smtp_generic_maps to rewrite the new address back to the original
during delivery.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_generic_maps
@other.example.com @example.com This can be done either globally or
with an -o override in a dedicated master.c
th
"root final.recipi...@external-domain.com" in /etc/postfix/virtual which
will give me the mails with the correct headers as per the example mail
to my preferred account, but I am not quite sure this is how it is supposed
to be configured.
I hope you can help me clear up my confusion.
Thank You,
Jay
Is there a way to exempt users from the always_bcc option (i.e.,
general counsel doesn't want mail logged in the system)? I seem to
recall there was a way to build an exclusion class, but my brain's
gone to bed before I have tonight, it would seem...
--Jay
I'm attempting to map local_recipient_maps via a Pgsql query.
The database contains the username portion of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a way to append @example.com to the result of the lookup query?
--Jay
e played around with the experimental
releases and there are a couple of features I'm really excited about
getting into production, but I want to wait for a stable release (even
though the Postfix "experimentals" are more stable than a lot of other
projects "stable" releas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Victor Duchovni wrote:
| On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:31:58AM -0500, Jay Deiman wrote:
|
|> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
|> Hash: SHA1
|>
|> I'm wondering if there is a release schedule available somewhere. I
|> poked a
icted aliases that needs protection.
As has been mentioned previously, mailman or another mailing list
manager has already solved this problem in a more robust fashion...
--
Jay Chandler / KB1JWQ
Living Legend / Systems Exorcist
Today's Excuse: the xy axis in the trackball is coordinate
ferdamnsure(tm) going to want to have a gateway system in front of this
with a list of legitimate users to avoid becoming an outscatter source,
though.
--
Jay Chandler / KB1JWQ
Living Legend / Systems Exorcist
Today's Excuse: All of the packets are empty
D 7.0-RELEASE-p2.
Many thanks for your help!
I've upgraded today as well, but don't see that message in my logs on
FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p4.
I seem to recall seeing some new options in Postfix a month or so ago
that may be relevant-- something to do with alerting on permission /
link exis
"? If so, do I just separate the responses with a newline or is
there some other delimiter I should use?
Thanks,
Jay
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkjhAYMACgkQQ0lr+ZVKSBiv9AC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Noel Jones wrote:
| Jay Deiman wrote:
|> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
|> Hash: SHA1
|>
|> Hello all,
|>
|> I'm wondering, when setting up a policy daemon, can you respond to
|> Postfix with multiple actions?
|
| Th
On Oct 29, 2008, at 1:29 AM, Simone Felici wrote:
I know, there is enough written on the net and on the mailinglist
too, but have found only old results, maybe the meanwhile something
is different, also I would ask you...
Which filesystem do you use on your mailserver?
I'm going to migrate
On Oct 29, 2008, at 9:03 PM, Tony Yarusso wrote:
We're having no end of trouble setting up a new server here, so I'm
hoping someone can explain what's going on. Basically, we have a new
server that of course will generate messages from cron jobs, PHP
mailers, and that sort of thing, and we wan
s UFS.
--Jay
On Nov 3, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
smtp-finger: Connected to wec-imail1.wachovia.com[169.200.91.91]:25
smtp-finger: < 220 wec-imail1.wachovia.com ESMTP Ready.
smtp-finger: > EHLO hqmtaint02.ms.com
smtp-finger: < 250-wec-imail1.wachovia.com Hello hqmtaint02.ms.com
[205.228.53
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefan Palme wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have something like this in my main.cf:
>
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> reject_non_fqdn_sender,
> reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
> reject_unknown_sender_domain,
> reject_unknown_recipient_
here, either a basic syntax
issue or a misunderstanding of how the transport maps actually work.
I would greatly appreciate a nudge in the right directly.
Thank you,
Jay
Kai:
I think this issue might be the same as the one that I'm encountering in my
post yesterday titled, "Postfix not using LMTP Transport in map".
Can you look at your logs and see if you're getting a similar message to
what I have below?
Host postfix/lmtp[22981]: C0EEEA8: to=http://postfix.1071
Greetings,
the aliases files are limited to 1024 chars/record because of NIS.
but postfix looks like it would take hash maps instead for things
like aliases. does this work around the 1024 character limit?
i hope, i hope. the chaining biz is annoying.
j.
hi,
i'm trying to convert from sendmail to postfix.
i have a utility (let's call it) that looks through
files in the sendmail mail queue and determines whether the
msg is a bounce message that i don't really want to send out.
i stop sendmail, then delete the q and d files, and re
Greetings,
My users have a script like so (sanitized for everyone's sake):
/usr/ucb/mail -s "a subject" \
-r contracts \
-c "list o folks"\
-b "diff list o folks" \
"real recip list" \
< some_file
I just switched the machine from sendmail to postfix.
the "-r contracts" "doesn't work". that is,
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 02:36:13PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 7/29/2010 2:24 PM, Jay G. Scott wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> My users have a script like so (sanitized for everyone's sake):
>> /usr/ucb/mail -s "a subject" \
>> -r contracts
what's the deal w/ no configure script?
you do know that you DON'T NEED autoconf/automake to install, right?
they're not hiding behind that old dodge, are they? i'm so sick of
that.
if i supply a configure script, will you guys use it?
every time i try to go to a newer version of postfix, the
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:33:26PM -0500, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:23:13PM -0500, Jay G. Scott wrote:
> >
> > what's the deal w/ no configure script?
> >
> > you do know that you DON'T NEED autoconf/automake to install, right?
&
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 01:40:29PM -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> On 8/4/2010 1:23 PM, Jay G. Scott wrote:
>> what's the deal w/ no configure script?
>>
>> you do know that you DON'T NEED autoconf/automake to install, right?
>> they're not hi
ument,
objectively, anyway.
j.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553g...@arlut.utexas.edu
Head of Sun Support, Sr. System Administrator
Applied Research Labs, Computer Science Div. S224
University of Texas at Austin
was drawn to postfix because
it seemed to me that, after all those years, the MTA was due for a
bottom-up rewrite. well, that's just my $0.02.
thanks.
j.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553g...@arlut.utexas.edu
Head of Sun Support, Sr. System Administrator
Applied Research
e so that mxhost2/ns6 does start
doing things without bothering mxhost1?
(I sent test emails from mxhost2/ns6 to inside and outside addresses
and the headers show they all go through mxhost1.)
j.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553g...@arlut.utexas.edu
Head of Sun S
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:47:55PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jay G. Scott:
> > relayhost = ns4.arlut.utexas.edu
> > transport_maps = hash:/VOLUMES/postfix/etc/pftransport
> > Mail leaving my site from ns6 should go straight
> > to ns4, and not touch mxhost1. I
gnored? Because
that doesn't seem natural to me. Relayhost ought to be honored
when the transport_map is irrelevant -- well, that's what
I've been expecting. Is that part of what I'm doing wrong?
j.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553g...@arlut.utexas.edu
He
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 03:41:26PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jay G. Scott:
> > Am I to understand that transport_map=value
> > existing at all means relayhost=value is ignored?
>
> No.
>
> Please answer the questions that I asked in my other response.
I will, bu
he values i put in,
and i've done the postmap or postalias as appropriate on these 4 files.
-----
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553g...@arlut.utexas.edu
Head of Sun Support, Sr. System Administrator
A
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 06:02:23PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jay G. Scott:
> >
> > a while back i posted to the effect that i couldn't get postfix to deliver
> > mail all by itself.
> >
> > it was pointed out that because i had two versions of postfi
y.
what's the syntax in that case?
g...@arlut.utexas.edu relay:[...@vme.arlut.utexas.edu]
or
g...@arlut.utexas.edu relay:[vme.arlut.utexas.edu]
or
g...@arlut.utexas.edu relay:g...@[vme.arlut.utexas.edu]
that is, what do i do about the user name on the right hand side?
i tried the middle one o
first, my problem from october is resolved, thanks to the help i got
from this list. basically i lacked the requisite knowledge. i'm
getting closer to competent, thanks.
(was: postfix not delivering all by itself. (it is now.))
i'm considering adding greylisting and SPF to postfix.
(ah, FWIW i
greetings,
i'm pretty new at this. my problem could be obvious.
i have a primary internet connection and a backup. sometimes the primary
side will tell the backup side to deliver mail for it. at least, that's
what i think based on what i see in the maillog snippets below.
mail that should be
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:40:38PM +0100, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2010-11-17 Jay G. Scott wrote:
> > now -- my relay_recipient_maps parameter points to pfknown_users
> > which has the form:
> > ttt OK
> > do i have to have ...@arlut.utexas.edu OK ?
>
= 0
11466: fxstat(2, 3, 0x08046AB8)= 0
11466: fstat64(5, 0x080467C0) = 0
11466: fxstat(2, 3, 0x08046C08)= 0
and the pattern "smtpd" doesn't appear anywhere in the truss output.
so what c
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 02:56:51PM -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 01:38:11PM -0500, Jay G. Scott wrote:
>
> > -
> > /etc/postfix/main.cf snippet:
> > -
> >
Greetings,
I'm a newbie at the mail w/ authentication thing.
So tell me what to read, since what I need is how to find answers and
not just the answers. But I've been searching the web and
I'm getting close, but no exact matches.
postfix-2.3.3
cyrus-sasl-*-2.1.22
saslauthd is running.
This is j
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 04:28:22PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> Jay G. Scott wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>
> Instructions to test SASL:
> http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#server_test
[snip]
Sigh. Truly, I am a noob.
I spent all morning getting the sasl2-sample-[server
Yes, I had too many backslashes.
Thanks.
Now I will get back to the other instructions.
Thanks again.
j.
- Forwarded message from Noel Jones -
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:30:32 -0500
From: Noel Jones
To: "Jay G. Scott"
CC: postfix users list
Subject: Re: conf
hi,
the goal: require AUTH and TLS to send email.
using these instructions:
http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/smtpauth/postfix_tls_support.html
postfix 2.3.3 from the RH enterprise rpm.
partial successes:
i can get tls to insert a header if i'm only using tls. (ie, tls but no au
Greetings,
Koetter and Evans were both right.
I get email w/ both tls headers and auth headers now.
Thanks.
Since I'm a noob it had to be something like that.
j.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553g...@arlut.utexas.edu
Head of Sun Support, Sr. Operating Systems Speci
Greetings,
client = thunderbird 3.0 beta 3
postfix 2.3.3
linux, host == jgstoy
doing TLS encryption and authentication.
windows/thunderbird 2.0.0.22 works
windows/outlook 2003 works
looking at /var/log/maillog i see that thunderbird 3 is setting
up a TLS connection okay.
but the authenticati
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 03:25:45PM -0500, Blake Hudson wrote:
> Original Message
> Subject: thunderbird 3.0, cram-md5 failing
> From: Jay G. Scott
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Date: Thursday, August 13, 2009 3:03:38 PM
>> Greetings,
>>
>>
r at least allow it.
Thus, I had to have PLAIN LOGIN in smtpd.conf. I surmise that
mech_list: PLAIN LOGIN is turning on loggin in through /etc/passwd.
Clearly, I'm a noob.
j.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553g...@arlut.utexas.edu
Head of Sun Support, S
gs=F user=ftn argv=/usr/lib/ifmail/ifmail -r $nexthop ($recipient)
bsmtp unix - n n - - pipe
flags=Fq. user=foo argv=/usr/local/sbin/bsmtp -f $sender $nexthop $recipient
-- mechanisms on smail.arlut.utexas.edu --
-- end of saslfinger output --
--
Jay Scott
ell someone what i'm doing.
thx in advance.
j.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553g...@arlut.utexas.edu
Head of Sun Support, Sr. Operating Systems Specialist
Applied Research Labs, Computer Science Div. S224
University of Texas at Austin
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:39:12PM +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> * Jay G. Scott :
> > okay, maybe i'm catching on.
> >
> > i set up the /etc/sasldb2 method of authentication.
> > that's doing so far what i want.
> >
> > 1. o
il.mc
file there was a line where you told it about puremessage and its
port number.
what's the equivalent in postfix?
thanks in advance.
j.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553g...@arlut.utexas.edu
Head of Sun Support, Sr. Operating Systems Specialist
Applied Research Labs, C
x_maps =
virtual_minimum_uid = 100
virtual_transport = virtual
virtual_uid_maps =
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553g...@arlut.utexas.edu
Head of Sun Support, Sr. System Administrator
Applied Research Labs, Computer Science Div. S224
University of Texas at Austin
accomplish this? i can't do this (right?)
user@*.arlut.utexas.edu OK
at least, i can't find that kind of thing documented.
right now, it looks like i'm going to use postfix on the outside
the firewall servers, and sendmail (because of the above) on
the inside servers. not wha
web pages people are sending me to, but
if the answer is there i can't figure it out. i haven't tried
the regexp N. Jones suggested. that'll be harder to try because
there's an automatic updating process that will change things behind
my back. i'm still thin
cific recipient domains by using a check_recipient_access map, similar
> to this example (but using the recipient, not the sender)
> http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#forged_sender
>
>
> -- Noel Jones
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553
h_destination reject_unknown_recipient_domain
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/relay_checkpermit
transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/pftransport
unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/pfmalias hash:/etc/aliases
thanks again.
j.
--
Jay Scot
Hello,
This machine has a list of legitimate users but does not deliver
mail locally. (It's a mail gateway.)
Presently user schumi gets copies of his mail delivered to three
systems. The three destinations are listed in virtual_alias_maps.
schumi: sch...@inm.arlut.utexas.edu,
wait a sec. i think my test procedure is not working.
i won't be able to check until this afternoon.
it may be the other configurations i thought i was trying
weren't actually being used at all.
j.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553g...@arlut.utexas.edu
Head of S
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 09:05:15AM -0500, Jay G. Scott wrote:
>
> wait a sec. i think my test procedure is not working.
> i won't be able to check until this afternoon.
> it may be the other configurations i thought i was trying
> weren't actually being used at all.
t
Can someone tell me whether the following is correct?
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/pfmalias hash:/etc/aliases
It begins to look like if the file ___HAS___ colons, like the aliases
man page that comes with postfix says, and you use
postalias hash:/etc/postfix/pfmalias
wi
Thanks to all who have tried to help me so far.
I'm sorry to be such a pest. I've tried a number of things and still
can't get it.
Management wants email to
user@ .arlut.utexas.edu
will be treated as though it had been addressed to
u...@arlut.utexas.edu
(sendmail can do this.)
60$@com>
Feb 27 07:39:03 ns4 postfix/qmgr[18269]: 1B4831D62B0:
from=, size=5855, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553g...@arlut.utexas.edu
Head of Sun Support, Sr. System Administrator
Applied Research Labs, Computer Science Div. S224
University of Texas at Austin
that is, when someone leaves our employ, we used the sendmail
redirect feature to reply
551 user has moved, try user@arl.REDIRECT
i've been looking for the postfix equivalent, but haven't found
it. is there such a thing?
j.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553
sorry for the earlier post. i kept looking and found it as
"relocated users". i'll be pursuing that.
j.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553g...@arlut.utexas.edu
Head of Sun Support, Sr. System Administrator
Applied Research Labs, Computer Science Div.
27;d test it, but I don't control the other machines in the transport
map, and I have a feeling management will frown on me sending test
messages to other than myself.
Thx, j.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553g...@arlut.utexas.edu
Head of Sun Support, Sr. System Admin
Transport_maps will still be honored, won't it?
I'd test it, but I don't control the other machines in the transport
map, and I have a feeling management will frown on me sending test
messages to other than myself.
Thx, j.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553g..
canonical_maps = regexp:/etc/postfix/pfrecipient_canonical
recipient_delimiter = +
relay_domains = vme.arlut.utexas.edu
relay_recipient_maps = regexp:/etc/postfix/pfrecipient_canonical
relayhost = vme.arlut.utexas.edu
sample_directory = /etc/postfix
sendmail_path = /usr/sbin/sendmail.postfix
setgid_group = postdro
ion.
Does the problem above ring a bell? He's using Outlook as
his client.
What else should I tell you?
So far I haven't been able to align his bounced msgs with
my log files.
Thx, j.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553g...@arlut.utexas.edu
Head of Sun Support, Sr. Sy
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 05:08:08PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 3/3/2014 4:45 PM, Jay G. Scott wrote:
> >
> > I have one user telling me that he has a long mailing list
> > (on the order of 34 -- hardly long) and some of the recipients
> > bounce. If he mails them o
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 04:19:16PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jay G. Scott:
> > overlook a "too many hops" notice.
> >
> > I've seen these at my site before, they've been going on for years,
> > but they're still rare. Maybe 4-6/year. I che
ns2.arlut.utexas.edu #
However, that address is okay -- sendmail -bv says it's deliverable.
So is this disconnect between service availability and what the
user sees normal? or fixable?
j.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553g...@arlut.utexas.edu
Head of Sun Support,
t?
j.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553g...@arlut.utexas.edu
Head of Sun Support, Sr. System Administrator
Applied Research Labs, Computer Science Div. S224
University of Texas at Austin
My maillog entries like like this:
Mar 18 03:45:40 jgs postfix/pickup[20868]: [ID 197553 mail.info] 8C94B4F6B:
uid=0 from=
What is the "[ID 197553 mail.info]" part?
Can I turn it off?
Thanks.
j.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553g...@arlut.utexas.edu
Head of S
RE: the after-queue, simple filter example
Just trying to figure out how it works.
I have a feeling I don't fully understand the full implications of
"after-queue".
>From master.cf:
# custom filter
filter unix- n n - 10 pipe
flags=Rq user=filter null_se
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 03:37:34PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 6/10/2014 3:05 PM, Jay G. Scott wrote:
> >
> > RE: the after-queue, simple filter example
> >
> > Just trying to figure out how it works.
> > I have a feeling I don't fully understand the
delivered unfiltered, no bounces, no hops.
main.cf:
content_filter = filter
got it filtered, but resulted in the hops bounce.
What am I missing?
j.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 03:37:34PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 6/10/2014 3:05 PM, Jay G. Scott wrote:
> >
> > RE: the after-queue
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 08:02:55PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 6/10/2014 5:45 PM, Jay G. Scott wrote:
> >
> > After trying various combinations of things in
> > main.cf and master.cf, I find that, using the script
> > below, if the mail reaches the filter script, the
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 04:42:42PM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:37:46AM -0500, Jay G. Scott wrote:
>
> > I had two smtp lines in the master.cf file. Splutter.
>
> You're supposed to. One is for the Postfix SMTP server
> (inbound mail):
&
97 matches
Mail list logo
