ter via Postfix-users wrote:
* Curtis J. Blank via Postfix-users:
I would like to get some insight as to the cause and correct
configuration to use. [...]
Maybe it is simply too early in the morning for me to get your point,
but what insight are you looking for, exactly?
You already found out that
Thank you, Alexander, Matus, Jaroslaw, Peter, and Bill, just the kind of
ideas I was looking for.
My old postfix server is running 2.11 and I have not dealt much with
postfix really since then because like I said it just worked, did what I
needed it to do. Currently I'm working with 3.9 and I
ch off that backbone.
TCP/IP was in it's infancy too at the time. That was over 30 years
before ipv6 was around so localhost was 127.0.0.1 and now to me, oh
yeah, ::1 is too now.
-Curt
On 6/28/24 12:09, Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users wrote:
* Curtis J. Blank via Postfix-users:
What I
tool to drill the hole in the cable. When the DESTA came out and you
could use Thinwire (coax) that was a revolution!. Yes I'm old. LOL
https://gunkies.org/wiki/DEC_Ethernet_Transceivers
On 6/28/24 12:59, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote:
Always in a good mood. It's a waste not
tfix-users wrote:
On 29/06/24 03:17, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote:
Well Peter all the "mynetworks =" that I have defined explicitly
state 127.0.0.1 not localhost and all the logging shows 127.0.0.1 not
localhost. So that is why I say I am using 127.0.0.1. So I cannot
follow
Yeah I thought of including the config but that OP was long due to all
the logging so I didn't want to make it longer. I did say in my OP I
would provide anything if requested.
-Curt
On 6/28/24 21:11, Peter via Postfix-users wrote:
On 29/06/24 05:59, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users
set to use 127.0.01 explicitly.
If anyone can explain the detailed why I am curious to know.
Thanks,
-Curt
On 6/28/24 22:16, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote:
Peter, my misunderstanding, sorry. This is what I discovered today in
my testing. I explicitly used 127.0.0.1 and not localhost
ual_alias_domains = lmdb:/etc/postfix/virtual
virtual_alias_maps = lmdb:/etc/postfix/virtual
On 6/28/24 23:27, Peter via Postfix-users wrote:
On 29/06/24 15:16, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote:
Peter, my misunderstanding, sorry. This is what I discovered today
in my testing. I expl
-o mynetworks=127.0.0.0/8
-o smtpd_use_tls=no
-o smtp_use_tls=no
spamtnsp unix - n n - - local
-o alias_maps=lmdb:/etc/aliaases
On 6/29/24 01:26, Peter via Postfix-users wrote:
On 29/06/24 18:09, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote:
I don'
On 6/29/24 04:01, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote:
On 29.06.24 01:41, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote:
No I am not confusing inbound and outbound
not you, someone other perhaps :-)
and for this I'm only concerned about inbound and actually only on
ports 10024-26
On 6/29/24 08:40, Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users wrote:
* Curtis J. Blank via Postfix-users:
Everything except this that is:
mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, $mydomain, www.$mydomain
Should this be set to:
mydestination = $myhostname, 127.0.0.1.$mydomain, $mydomain, www
On 6/29/24 09:38, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
On 2024-06-28 at 23:45:33 UTC-0400 (Fri, 28 Jun 2024 22:45:33 -0500)
Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
OK I tired this. What "mydestination" is set to does not matter
whether it's localhost or 127.
I meant to mention I do not see any connections/traffic on port 10026 in
the mail logs.
-Curt
On 6/29/24 10:21, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote:
On 6/29/24 04:01, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote:
On 29.06.24 01:41, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote:
No I am not
in those log entries.
Just saying looks like my expectations were off...
On 6/29/24 11:59, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote:
On 29.06.24 10:28, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote:
I meant to mention I do not see any connections/traffic on port 10026
in the mail logs.
see
201 - 214 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
