Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-07 17:16:
I'll let Jörg at sys4 take a look at this.
+1
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0
tests=ARC_INVALID,ARC_SIGNED,AWL,
DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,DMARC_MISSING,
KAM_SHORT,MAILING_LI
Matthew McGehrin via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-07 18:31:
Any workarounds in Thunderbird to override this behavior?
imho if you show Reply-To in this list you will see original poster ?
i have not tryed it self yet, using roundcube mostly
___
P
toganm--- via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-07 18:32:
Abusix Mail Intelligence;
https://lookup.abusix.com/search?q=188.68.34.52
https://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/188.68.34.52.html
not even on dnswl.org :/
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-
Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-07 18:57:
* toganm--- via Postfix-users :
Maybe it would have been a better idea to check if the mail server is
listed
in any rbl sites. For one it is listed in Abusix and my server is
rejected it as a result
What makes you believe the I
Michael via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-09 11:57:
On Monday, 6 March 2023 17:08:49 CET, Wietse Venema wrote:
This week, the Postfix mailing lists will be migrated from Majordomo
at
Cloud9.net to Mailman at Sys4.de.
[...]
what a coincidence!
https://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/196.0.87.222
Matthew McGehrin via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-09 21:07:
The Reply-To has always been the original poster for 10+ years. No
sense changing it now. :)
its just not safe to dkim sign
if maillists stop breaking dkim it would be lots better
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=5.0
test
PGNet Dev via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-12 14:46:
systemctl list-units | egrep "regex|clam|spam|dkim" |grep service
clamav-daemon.serviceloaded active running clamd scanner
clamav-milter.serviceloaded active running clamav milter
dkimpy-milter.s
Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-12 16:10:
* Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users :
approach to subscriber self management. Once you've become a
registered
MLM platform participant you can easily change settings that will
apply to all
lists you've subscribed to in one plac
Mar 17 11:38:31 localhost postfix/smtpd[22150]: lost connection after
STARTTLS from list.sys4.de[2a03:4000:10:51d:b8ce:63ff:feca:a5a0]
Mar 17 12:09:10 localhost postfix/smtpd[23415]: lost connection after
STARTTLS from list.sys4.de[2a03:4000:10:51d:b8ce:63ff:feca:a5a0]
maybe it works ?
can i m
postfix--- via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-17 16:17:
I have 12 of these attempts so far today.
Ralf forgot to check "posttls-finger junc.eu" :)
its solved now
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an e
Gerd Hoerst via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-18 14:54:
smtpd_tls_mandatory_protocols = !SSLv2, !SSLv3, !TLSv1
smtpd_tls_protocols = !SSLv2,!SSLv3,!TLSv1
in main.cf
in main.cf put a # in this lines, so its default from postconf -d
but unfortunately i have a sender (its a printer
Peter via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-19 11:37:
Assuming you are correct then you still gain nothing with this
setting, and if you are not correct then it will cause you to
downgrade potential encrypted connections to plain text. I know
someone will likely argue with me, but I can really th
Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-22 11:43:
Dnia 20.03.2023 o godz. 21:46:59 Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
pisze:
Luckily here a couple of shops remain, even for clothes and
electronics (mostly household). It is much uglier a bit further
[...]
I replied to you off-list (a
Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-22 16:22:
Dnia 22.03.2023 o godz. 16:18:11 Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users
pisze:
>raj@rafa:~$ mailq
>-Queue ID- --Size-- Arrival Time -Sender/Recipient---
>5508C41121 8652 Mon Mar 20 23:35:40 r...@ra
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-22 16:36:
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 04:28:36PM +0100, Benny Pedersen via
Postfix-users wrote:
>> mx ~ # posttls-finger sdaoden.eu
>> posttls-finger: Connected to sdaoden.eu[217.144.132.164]:25
>> posttls-finger: < 220 sda
duluxoz via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-23 06:41:
Sorry Everyone, but I need to test if my posts are going through
+1
Please ignore (or feel free to send me a confirmation)
if that going through ? :)
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-u
and i noticed
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; list.sys4.de;
dkim=pass header.d=junc.eu header.i=@junc.eu;
arc=pass;
dmarc=pass (Used From Domain Record) header.from=junc.eu
policy.dmarc=reject
Authentication-Results: list.sys4.de;
dkim=pass header.d=junc.eu header.i=@junc.eu; arc=pass;
fh--- via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-24 02:16:
When other users in this postfix system send email to users in this
domain, will it be delivered locally? How can I force postfix to
deliver messages just following MX records?
make sure postfix database files do not have this domain in there
Peter via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-26 01:05:
Mailman has a setting that addresses this, reply_goes_to_list.
According to mm docs, this adds the original From: address as a CC
there will be a day when mailman dont sink ships, so titanik survived
it, if just mailman was called AFTER rspa
Peter via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-26 06:15:
DKIM and ARC signatures need to be checked right after the message is
received,
not really, all that is needed is to frezze stata of dkim, arc, dmarc at
recieve state, when this is frezzed in arc, then downstreams can trust
it or dont care
Elisamuel Resto via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-26 20:27:
No mailing list that does mangling will do DKIM properly UNLESS, as
suggested before, mail is signed by the ML server after mangled.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,
AUTHRES_ARC_NONE,AUT
Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-26 22:48:
Dnia 26.03.2023 o godz. 13:27:48 Elisamuel Resto via Postfix-users
pisze:
DKIM/SPF/DMARC were created to work with legitimate mail and to help
detect (and possibly reject) mail that is forged or modified by a
third party. That is what m
Dan Mahoney (Gushi) via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-28 12:10:
Hey there all,
Dayjob sometimes receives mail for one domain that we'd like to have
bypass certain milters (specifically, we want to exempt them from some
filtering/scanning mitlers since the domain is pretty much entirely
passthr
Nuno Pereira via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-30 20:29:
We have tried to figure out why this happens, but haven't found a
solution until now.
logs ?
It should be mentioned that failure notifications are sent from
@virtualdomain.com when it's the case.
i don't know yet
note hopefully yo
tom--- via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-04-08 14:57:
If message has image included, or has UTF8 chars, is base64 encoding
must be used? Thank you again.
utf-8 is 7bit, so no
The same is true for HTML entries, many news mails have utf8 and
qoutedprintble, and always its HTML, hmm:)
there is
tom--- via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-04-09 04:02:
I have this setting in main.cf:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated,
reject_unauth_destination,
check_policy_service unix:private/policyd-spf,
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject
tom--- via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-04-09 08:18:
I was exactly using google DNS. Do u mean Google will block queries for
RBL?
incorrect questions gives incorrect answers
google does not block you, but the rbls is blocking google
we all live in a free world of unlimited problems to solve
tom--- via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-04-09 09:51:
what action code policyd should return for passing the request to next
check?
DUNNO
as in https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/quota_plugin/
90-quota.conf example
___
Postfix-users mai
postfix--- via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-04-15 17:12:
Apr 14 23:00:08 mailserver postfix/smtps/smtpd[1653]: connect from
unknown[192.168.1.44]
Apr 14 23:00:08 mailserver postfix/smtps/smtpd[1653]: SSL_accept error
from unknown[192.168.1.44]: Connection reset by peer
Apr 14 23:00:08 mailserver
Oleksandr via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-04-15 19:37:
Please, here are the results of executing this command in attachment:
port 465 is twice in master
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to post
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-04-15 20:06:
As stated above, there was no need. What's needed now is a PCAP file
with a full recording of exactly one TCP connection between the camera
and Postfix on port 465.
first remove the 2nd port 465
imho postfix list this as error ?
_
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-04-15 20:12:
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 08:09:58PM +0200, Benny Pedersen via
Postfix-users wrote:
> As stated above, there was no need. What's needed now is a PCAP file
> with a full recording of exactly one TCP connection between the c
Bill Cole via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-04-18 21:10:
On 2023-04-18 at 14:54:22 UTC-0400 (Wed, 19 Apr 2023 02:54:22 +0800)
tom--- via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
How to reject messages by languages?
For example, only English, Germany and Chinese messages will be
accepted. All oth
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; list.sys4.de; dkim=fail;
arc=none (Message is not ARC signed);
dmarc=none
Authentication-Results: list.sys4.de; dkim=fail;
arc=none (Message is not ARC signed); dmarc=none
when originating mails is not dkim signed then i belive dkim=fail here
should be repor
imho a bug
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-04-23 16:43:
On 23.04.23 11:19, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
Subject: [pfx] postfix does not add Return-Path if mail is missing it
imho a bug
it's added in local if delivering to mbox or maildir:
http://www.postfix.org/
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-02 15:28:
perhaps you would want to set up spam filter?
spamassassin has check for date in future and also many other for
spammy signs.
Viktor provided a milter that test it before queue, while spamassassin
is after queue ?
but yes
Corey Hickman via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-04 14:18:
We have 3 smtp servers for sending messages. When mail in one server
has delivery issue, how can we setup it to use another more servers
for second/third delivery?
retroisk answer, when postfix maillist was on cloud9, it had 3 ipv4, 3
Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-04 14:41:
* Corey Hickman via Postfix-users :
Hello list,
We have 3 smtp servers for sending messages. When mail in one server
has
delivery issue, how can we setup it to use another more servers for
second/third delivery?
You could use sm
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-04 15:28:
Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users:
[OT] answer, when postfix maillist was on cloud9, it had 3 ipv4, 3
ipv6, and i have newver seen mails that was remotely tempfailed used
another ip in cloud9, why this ?
Because each host had its own
Tom Reed via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-16 14:16:
Should we reject failed message on DKIM validation stage, or DMARC
validation stage, or both?
if dkim is based on reject you will ignore dmarc policy, just dont
reject is safe :)
tip, add ipwhitelist in both so you never ever reject mai
Tom Reed via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-16 14:41:
so for both DKIM and DMARC failure you send them to spam folder?
what dmarc policy ?, none, quarantine, reject ?
forget dkim here, its not designed to be a spam scanner
___
Postfix-users mailing
João Silva via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-16 14:49:
Yes, straight to a Spam folder.
a bit silly if its a maillist, if its spam why not unsubscribe ?
i loose maybe :/
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send
Scott Kitterman via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-16 15:04:
DMARC does have such a policy component. Rejecting mail which fails
DMARC for domains that have a policy of p=reject is common. DMARC
does have a high error rate for some types of email, so I would
recommend a careful evaluation of
Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-16 15:20:
* Scott Kitterman via Postfix-users :
DKIM has no policy mechanism associated with it, so there's no basis
in any standardized mechanism to determine if a DKIM failure should be
cause for rejection. I don't think it makes logical
mailmary--- via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-16 11:50:
Isn't the above useless? Should it say something like:
SASL LOGIN authentication failed: failed@email.address
PS:
I know that I can add -v to the smtpd submission process to get
thousands of debug lines and among them is the user/email
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-16 13:52:
That is not the case.
i know my weakforced is not perfekt but i see all detail before reject,
even if postfix dont log it
https://github.com/PowerDNS/weakforced
___
Postfix-users mailing
mailmary--- via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-16 14:14:
so why not report the email, instead of a base64 string?
how usefull is decode of base64 here ?
its what happens next it more usefull to log
https://github.com/PowerDNS/weakforced
___
Postfi
Bill Cole via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-16 17:34:
I have no idea what the answer to that is, as I don't use OpenDMARC.
You may want to figure out where, if anywhere, OpenDMARC support is
available.
http://www.trusteddomain.org/opendmarc/
___
Po
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-17 09:28:
On 16.05.23 16:38, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
dmarc does not imho use ARC results yet :/
You must configure trusted ARC signers. You can't blindly trust ARC
just like you can't blindly trust SPF
i
Tom Reed via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-17 09:31:
On 16.05.23 16:38, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
dmarc does not imho use ARC results yet :/
You must configure trusted ARC signers.
You can't blindly trust ARC just like you can't blindly trust SPF
May I ask what
Byung-Hee HWANG via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-19 04:26:
Thanks for advice!
[renewalparams]
reuse_key = True
preferred_chain = ISRG Root X1
And
I can't say anything yet. I need some test for long time. If i am sure
what DANE is,
posttls-finger example.org, basic
Tom Reed via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-23 01:53:
I am not sure why I need a backup mx indeed, but if you make a simple
dig,
you find gmail, fastmail, protonmail, comcast, free.fr those big
providers
do have backup MXs.
Though yahoo, outlook don't have backup MX as a comparison.
one mx
Byung-Hee HWANG via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-25 05:42:
Thanks for good tool, because still i feel very hard to make "3 1 1"
tlsa things. Someday far later, i'll try this "3 1 1" things.
Actually i cannot say anything about DANE. Still work in progress ...
postfix tls output-server-tlsa
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-30 14:30:
There's no good reason to have mail sent to mx2 unless mx1 is down.
and subject says load balancing, not backup mx
imho OP asked not to have mx backup, but load balancing, in with case
HA-Proxy would help more
also if load balan
Michael via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-06-05 10:07:
Hello list,
I have a postfix with rspamd as milter. When a mail is sent with many
recipients, rspamd gets the mail with all recipients. If I want to
reject only one specific recipient, the whole mail is rejected. Is
there any way to split the
Víctor Rubiella Monfort via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-06-08 14:06:
echo "HELLO" | sendmail -N 'never' t...@test.es; echo $?
-N parameter only controls DSN, it does not do REJECT or BOUNCES
sendmail -f t...@test.es -bv t...@test.es -N never
more funny results
hopefully test.es is your dom
wesley--- via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-06-09 02:17:
Hello,
for this spf setting,
bar.org. 3600 IN TXT "v=spf1 -all"
no ip addresses were provided.
does it mean all IP are passed, or no IP can pass?
no ip will pass
essentially all mails is rejected from that domain if recipient enforc
Robert Senger via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-06-29 17:21:
...
The point is that spamassassin needs to know the username when
processing an email, to update the correct bayes database. The username
given to spamassassin by spamass-milter is the email address of the
recipient. This is fine, as
Israel britto via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-07-04 00:07:
How can I delete all mailer-daemon messages from my mail server?
no logs, no problem :)
more help post atleast postconf -nf with logs
mailer-daemon is not a bug or anything to solve, unless logs tels
otherwize
Maurizio Caloro via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-07-16 10:05:
when i want to provide the file access via postmap, it inflates to
double size.
cidr files should not be postmapped
not even if in postgresql :)
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-
Maurizio Caloro via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-07-16 13:06:
There's no point in postmap'ing cidr tables.
http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html
- Permanent allow/denylist test
Out of curiosity: what's your use case that requires checking the
client's
IP against a 47
Peter via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-08-15 10:44:
This is a bad idea for several reasons. If you want submission use
ports 465 and/or 587 as they are intended. Don't try to use a service
that is meant for a different purpose for this.
mta to mta can use port 465 or 587 aswell for intended
Jon Smart via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-08-16 04:01:
How can I disable auth on port 25? I really don't want users to use
port
25 for auth sender. i am using postfix version 3.6.4 on ubuntu 22.04.
its default disabled, no ?
unsure give us "postconf -n | grep auth"
my own is
mx ~ # postco
Peter via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-08-16 09:01:
mta to mta can use port 465 or 587 aswell for intended purpose :)
This is incorrect, MTAs should not and will not connect to any port
other than port 25 for MX traffic.
you are correct if you only have ONE mta
so its valid if both client an
Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-08-19 02:30:
Ciao. And a nice weekend from Germany i wish.
(And sorry for being off-topic.)
postfix have not lua support yet, maybe it will come ?
reminds me of OS/2 REXX, if ibm can make it good, why ignore it ?, lua
is still limeted more t
Danil Smirnov via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-08-30 18:32:
I've tried some approaches with no luck, this seems rather tricky. Is
it possible to achieve this at all without using the second Postfix
server?
virtual_alias:
f...@example.org f...@example.net
postmap this file
basicly what you w
Bryan K. Walton via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-09-20 22:22:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 03:01:21PM -0500, Noel Jones via Postfix-users
wrote:
The check_sender_access must be BEFORE any permit_mynetworks or
permit_sasl_authenticated.
Thanks Noel!
That was the issue. I had check_sender_access
Ivan Ionut via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-10-16 09:33:
And in my logs I have this example of blocked email(a non-spam one):
blocked using dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net
blocked using spam.dnsbl.anonmails.de
if this 2 dnsbl lists ips in dnswl.org then its time to remove in
postscreen, imh
Noel Butler via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-11-05 04:53:
On 03/11/2023 10:22, Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users wrote:
- SPF breaks all hosts which have users that effectively want
their email to be forwarded to a different address.
This is basically any campus, and much, much more.
FUD...
Jesper Dybdal via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-11-05 13:48:
To avoid using a public name server for DNSBL lookups, I would like the
DNSBL checks to be done using only the name server running on
localhost.
But I would like the rest of the system to have for instance Google as
a secondary name se
rest of the system to have for instance Google
as a secondary name server.
On 05.11.23 15:12, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
its more simple to let postfix use /etc/resolver.conf as is, and then
let spam filter use loopback ips only
spamassassin local.cf:
this does not apply for
Dino Edwards via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-11-14 13:43:
I would appreciate some assistance.
https://amavisd-milter.sourceforge.net/
just use that, it replace all milters you have
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsu
Damian via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-11-14 19:28:
https://amavisd-milter.sourceforge.net/
just use that, it replace all milters you have
This is a confusing statement.
in what way ?, if you can configure opendmarc with postfix why is
amavisd milter a problem ?
amavisd only miss openARC
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-11-14 19:44:
Dino Edwards via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-11-14 13:43:
I would appreciate some assistance.
On 14.11.23 18:13, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
https://amavisd-milter.sourceforge.net/
just use that, it replace
Dino Edwards via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-11-15 10:42:
That's what Dino is trying to do. Make amavis-over-milter add an DKIM
AR-header, then make OpenDMARC evaluate DMARC using that header. It
may be true that SpamAssassin 4 has a DMARC test, but Amavis >does not
use such test hit for a poli
Vincent Lefevre via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-11-21 17:44:
So, if I understand correctly, the admin at Inria is wrong.
MX is optional if A/ exists for same domain/subdomain
BTW, in the mean time, I could see on another machine that exim4
has the same behavior as postfix.
parrent MX
Togan Muftuoglu via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-12-31 11:56:
mailbox_transport = lmtp:172.16.0.216:24
virtual_transport = lmtp:172.16.0.216:24
this it is
transport_destination_recipient_limit = 1
imho not needed
How do I achieve that postfix sends all mail both for the virtual
domains a
John Fawcett via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-01-08 18:09:
#/etc/postfix/regexp_recipient_bcc
a...@xx.com devnull
d...@xx.com devnull
@xx.com zz...@xx.com
Postfix will still generate bcc messages for emails to abc and def but
they won't actually get sent out.
this is why always_bcc
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-01-11 15:56:
natan via Postfix-users:
Hi Wietse Have you thought about postfix repo for Debian, just like
dovecot has for his relase ?
I'm asking by the way
Yes. It will happen some time.
so next is gentoo ebuilds ? :)
Gerd Hoerst via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-01-14 16:20:
Hi !
OK is set now
RejectFailures false
in /etc/opendmarc.conf
and
127.0.0.1
localhost
hoerst.net
.hoerst.net
in /etc/opendkim/trusted.hosts
How can i check if its now correct with my setup, that mail which is
not coming from smpt o
Gerd Hoerst via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-01-14 18:05:
Hi !
Still no success..
sorry then, i just use amavisd :=)
but what are logged from opendkim ?
grep -r MTA /path/to/logdir/
note is try to help get MTA working
___
Postfix-users mailing li
ARC-Authentication-Results i=1; list.sys4.de; dkim=pass
header.d=junc.eu; arc=none (Message is not ARC signed); dmarc=pass (Used
From Domain Record) header.from=junc.eu policy.dmarc=reject
Authentication-Results mx.junc.eu (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit
key) header.d=postfix.org header.b="ip
Carl Brewer via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-02-03 03:09:
In a world where error messages are increasingly being obfuscated, it's
great to see :
Feb 3 00:00:28 rollcage13 postfix/postscreen[22418]: warning:
postscreen_access_list: non-null host address bits in
"2403:5814:f681:ab0c::0/48", pe
Joachim Lindenberg via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-02-12 13:07:
Any idea for the cause and a fix?
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-use
lists--- via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-02-24 09:49:
check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/client_checks,
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/sender_checks,
check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/rbl_override,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
check_policy_service unix:private/polic
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-03-03 15:59:
milters vrfydmn and milterfrom, which allow you to reject mail where
envelope and header from: are different
ok if smtpd_milter_maps knows all maillist ips to not use milters, it
could be ok
neither of these controls the
David Bürgin via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-03-03 17:59:
Gerben Wierda:
Aliases are nice, to receive mail. But when you reply, the address
behind the alias is exposed.
I’m puzzling a bit over this statement … I also use aliases but was not
aware that they would expose my real address?
As a
Stephen Satchell via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-03-08 06:52:
grep relay= mail.log | grep -v relay=local
I can then use the message ID to get all the log information for each
questioned transaction.
Am I on the right road? Please disabuse me of any incorrect notions.
is it not grep -i r
Glenn Tenney via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-03-18 03:52:
My question in one, hopefully simple sentence, is:
In Postfix, how do I configure Postfix such that all email to
"user@some.domain" will return an error code (e.g. 550 user unknown)
to bounce that email
Victor gave a vierd config
Glenn Tenney via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-03-18 08:50:
Thanks. I’m hosting several domains: a couple need to accept any
user@ except some that specifically need to be rejected delivering
locally; some domains are more normal, just accept specific users &
deliver to some local user (sometimes
it go into endless loop if mx is missing, so it does not do a/
failback testing, is this a bug ?
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-03-24 02:31:
The code should be fixed, but nobody has complained loudly enough.
time out or not, dnssec is green, tlsa is yellow, should smtp test be
needed when tlsa is not green ?
if smtp test is not done without tlsa green i think problem
Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-04-02 10:14:
Hey there all,
I’m setting up a staging version of dayjob’s ticket system, and we’d
basically like postfix to still function, but instead of touching the
internet at all, just deliver everything to a single file (or a
maildir, I suppos
Authentication-Results list.sys4.de; dkim=pass header.d=porcupine.org;
arc=none (Message is not ARC signed); dmarc=pass (Used From Domain
Record) header.from=porcupine.org policy.dmarc=none
intended ?
dmarc can't be aligned with this missing, i just complain for the
authres in spamassassin ca
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-04-15 15:21:
Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users:
Authentication-Results list.sys4.de; dkim=pass header.d=porcupine.org;
arc=none (Message is not ARC signed); dmarc=pass (Used From Domain
Record) header.from=porcupine.org policy.dmarc=none
intended
Dimitris via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-04-15 16:22:
a totally different approach :
you could advise those with gmail accounts to use gmail as an email
client and pull emails from your server.
maybe not ideal (=trusting their email credentials within google), but
eitherway, people using gmai
Iker SAENZ via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-04-16 14:14:
postfix-users suscribe
you are already
but incase you like to have one more email address subscribed follow
links below here
List-Id: "For discussions about using Postfix: questions, problem
reports,
or feature requests. Open subsc
Peter via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-04-25 09:19:
On 15/04/24 10:14, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
Authentication-Results list.sys4.de; dkim=pass
header.d=porcupine.org; arc=none (Message is not ARC signed);
dmarc=pass (Used From Domain Record) header.from=porcupine.org
Peter via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-04-25 09:22:
You make a confusing, factually incomplete post with claims that are
incorrect and then complain about a lack of clear response on a
different list? If you're going to run down the postfix list for your
own failure at least have the decency
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
