Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 03:55:54PM +0800, Joan Moreau via Postfix-users wrote:
>
> > > This should be either the instance independent:
> > >
> > > relay/unix/syslog_name =
> > > ${multi_instance_name?{$multi_instance_name}:{postfix}}/$service_name
> > >
>
There's a particularly obnoxious ESP that won't take no for an answer,
repeatedly retrying delivery attempts despite 5xx responses -- unless
"no" is spelled exactly "550 5.1.1 ...", apparently.
Cute. I'll just throw that into an access map, and... nope, they get
550 5.0.0, as noted in access(5).
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
> Rob Foehl via Postfix-users:
> > There's a particularly obnoxious ESP that won't take no for an answer,
> > repeatedly retrying delivery attempts despite 5xx responses -- unless
> > "no" is spelled exactly "550 5.1.1 ...", apparently.
>
> That's what Postfix says
Steve Matzura via Postfix-users:
>
> On 10/21/2024 12:42 PM, postfix--- via Postfix-users wrote:
> >> 2024-10-21T16:29:00.942189+00:00 theglobalvoice postfix/qmgr[3900]:
> >> E53B5103176: from=<>, size=3212, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
> >> 2024-10-21T16:29:01.124528+00:00 theglobalvoice postfix/smtp[
On 10/21/2024 1:14 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Steve Matzura via Postfix-users:
On 10/21/2024 12:42 PM, postfix--- via Postfix-users wrote:
2024-10-21T16:29:00.942189+00:00 theglobalvoice postfix/qmgr[3900]:
E53B5103176: from=<>, size=3212, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
2024-10-21T16:2
This should be either the instance independent:
relay/unix/syslog_name =
${multi_instance_name?{$multi_instance_name}:{postfix}}/$service_name
How to do that ?
I should have also asked for "multi_instance_name", but I
assume that's set correctly in each instance (check!).
it is
That
On 2024-10-21 at 16:43:05 UTC-0400 (Mon, 21 Oct 2024 16:43:05 -0400)
Steve Matzura via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
[ big snip...]
Here's a returned mail message I received when I tried to simply send
a message to myself. This shows me no mail is going out at all. I
actually was
[
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 03:55:54PM +0800, Joan Moreau via Postfix-users wrote:
> > This should be either the instance independent:
> >
> > relay/unix/syslog_name =
> > ${multi_instance_name?{$multi_instance_name}:{postfix}}/$service_name
> >
> How to do that ?
By not NOT setting:
relay
Support Privianet via Postfix-users:
> Hi,
>
> Some old domains still have their MX records pointing towards my server
> but no more address. Their domain is not listed in relay_domains anymore.
>
> When a server tries to send a message to a previously existing address,
> it gets a 554 'Relay a
Steve Matzura via Postfix-users:
>
> On 10/21/2024 1:14 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> > Steve Matzura via Postfix-users:
> >> On 10/21/2024 12:42 PM, postfix--- via Postfix-users wrote:
> 2024-10-21T16:29:00.942189+00:00 theglobalvoice postfix/qmgr[3900]:
> E53B5103176: fr
On 10/21/2024 1:33 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Steve Matzura via Postfix-users:
On 10/21/2024 1:14 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Steve Matzura via Postfix-users:
On 10/21/2024 12:42 PM, postfix--- via Postfix-users wrote:
2024-10-21T16:29:00.942189+00:00 theglobalv
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 12:28:59PM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> > Cute. I'll just throw that into an access map, and... nope, they get
> > 550 5.0.0, as noted in access(5). Makes sense, but standards compliance
> > isn't a terribly compelling argument when the other side can't
On 10/21/2024 12:42 PM, postfix--- via Postfix-users wrote:
2024-10-21T16:29:00.942189+00:00 theglobalvoice postfix/qmgr[3900]:
E53B5103176: from=<>, size=3212, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
2024-10-21T16:29:01.124528+00:00 theglobalvoice postfix/smtp[4038]:
E53B5103176: to=,
orig_to=,
relay=mail.ga
Hi,
Some old domains still have their MX records pointing towards my server
but no more address. Their domain is not listed in relay_domains anymore.
When a server tries to send a message to a previously existing address,
it gets a 554 'Relay access denied' answer. I would like them get a mor
Rob Foehl via Postfix-users:
> There's a particularly obnoxious ESP that won't take no for an answer,
> repeatedly retrying delivery attempts despite 5xx responses -- unless
> "no" is spelled exactly "550 5.1.1 ...", apparently.
That's what Postfix says for an unknon unknown recipient:
rcpt to:
5
Everything's been fine up until this morning. With no knowledge of any
changes by anyone, I'm now getting entries in mail.log that look like this:
2024-10-21T16:29:00.942189+00:00 theglobalvoice postfix/qmgr[3900]:
E53B5103176: from=<>, size=3212, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
2024-10-21T16:29:01.124
2024-10-21T16:29:00.942189+00:00 theglobalvoice postfix/qmgr[3900]: E53B5103176:
from=<>, size=3212, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
2024-10-21T16:29:01.124528+00:00 theglobalvoice postfix/smtp[4038]: E53B5103176:
to=, orig_to=,
relay=mail.gandi.net[2001:4b98:e00::9]:587, delay=0.19, delays=0/0/0.09/0.0
You’ve been told about 10 times now to check your reverse dns ptr records for the ips used for outbound mail. have you done that? doesn’t look like itfurther you need to check your forward mx records are correct.once you’ve checked and fixed all of that there will be something new to say.On Oct 21,
Joan Moreau via Postfix-users:
> Hi Wiestse?
>
> I have no "claim", I am not " accusing" anyone of anything, I am just
> sharing a problem I have and happy to work together on finding the root
> cause.
>
> Being aggressive with users won' t work
Please provide logging that shows that mail enters
Hi Wiestse
I have no "claim", I am not " accusing" anyone of anything, I am just
sharing a problem I have and happy to work together on finding the root
cause.
Being aggressive with users won' t work
Best
Joan
On Mon, 2024-10-21 at 11:00 -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
wrote:
> Vikto
Clearly something has changed. It may be simply that you are now routing to the isp via ipv6 instead of ipv4, for example.google how to, and check that all of your public ip (v4 and v6) that may show up as your source address when connecting to outside SMTP servers have PTR records.this will typica
> Absolutely nothing has changed. I'm the only one who even has a clue how to
> make these kinds of changes, and I've been
> away from this project for a week now.
Mail providers are always tweaking things to try and stay ahead of the
spammers. It may be that this provider you're sending to just
Hi Wietse
Thanks for the config, but it still closes the port when I try to do a test.
Anyway the task changed a bit, we have to keep the original From, but only
change the Return-Path/Reply-to for every email sent.
Also it doesn't have to be specified for each port in master.cf, so maybe
somet
Etienne Gladu via Postfix-users:
> Hi Wietse
>
> Thanks for the config, but it still closes the port when I try to do a test.
LOOK. IN. YOUR. LOGS. You probably made more than one mistake.
> Anyway the task changed a bit, we have to keep the original From,
> but only change the Return-Path/Reply
On 10/21/2024 3:06 PM, Andrew Athan via Postfix-users wrote:
Clearly something has changed. It may be simply that you are now
routing to the isp via ipv6 instead of ipv4, for example.
google how to, and check that all of your public ip (v4 and v6) that
may show up as your source address when
25 matches
Mail list logo
