Dnia 23.11.2020 o godz. 16:29:13 @lbutlr pisze:
>
> This is not accurate. First, the direct message almost certainly arrives
> first.
Unless you use greylisting :) - in that case list message usually arrives
first, as the direct message is generally from previously unknown sender and
has to wait.
On 11/24/20 1:51 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> @lbutlr wrote:
>> On 23 Nov 2020, at 15:27, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
>>> Dnia 23.11.2020 o godz. 11:49:39 D'Arcy Cain pisze:
If someone replies to a mailing list and copies the sender then that
person gets two copies. The above recipe avoids that.
>>
Dnia 23.11.2020 o godz. 11:49:39 D'Arcy Cain pisze:
If someone replies to a mailing list and copies the sender then that
person gets two copies. The above recipe avoids that.
On 11/23/20 5:27 PM, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
If someone gets two copies - a direct one and the mailing list one - then
h
On 24.11.20 13:50, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
note that it's possible to Bcc: message to mailing list so it does not
contain list address in To:/Cc:
... as this message clearly shows.
I set mailing lists not to avoid duplicate messages (and usually drop direct
mail).
However, this thread
michael Schumacher wrote:
Joe,
Due to some recent malware (in attachments, obvious stuff) wanted to add AV scanning. I
gather "Amavis-new" is the hot ticket these days,
I deal with Sophos products and would like to use their linux product to do the
scanning. Seems to be precious little on
> michael Schumacher wrote:
>> Joe,
>>
Due to some recent malware (in attachments, obvious stuff) wanted to add AV
> scanning. I gather "Amavis-new" is the hot ticket these days,
>>> I deal with Sophos products and would like to use their linux product to do
> the scanning. Seems to be preci
On 24 Nov 2020, at 05:50, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 23.11.20 16:30, @lbutlr wrote:
>> Or you use procmail/Sieve to add a reply-to header to messages that have
>> the mailing list email in the headers.
> It's silly to set up procmail rule to remove "duplicate" message and then
> set up ru
On 23 Nov 2020, at 23:51, Bob Proulx wrote:
> @lbutlr wrote:
>> On 23 Nov 2020, at 15:27, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
>>> Dnia 23.11.2020 o godz. 11:49:39 D'Arcy Cain pisze:
If someone replies to a mailing list and copies the sender then that
person gets two copies. The above recipe avo
On 23 Nov 2020, at 23:55, Bob Proulx wrote:
> @lbutlr wrote:
>> Bob Proulx wrote:
>>> But so many people use Gmail these days that they have gotten used to
>>> the way Gmail does things. And Gmail de-duplicates and saves the
>>> first message with any particular message-id that arrives. And then
On 24 Nov 2020, at 02:44, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> Dnia 23.11.2020 o godz. 16:29:13 @lbutlr pisze:
>>
>> This is not accurate. First, the direct message almost certainly arrives
>> first.
>
> Unless you use greylisting
That's a whole different issue and anyone using greylisting now I would never
Dnia 24.11.2020 o godz. 12:20:23 @lbutlr pisze:
> > I'm not talking about client getting confused about threading. I'm talking
> > about the fact that when you get only an off-list message and reply to it,
> > the reply goes only to the original sender and not to the list,
>
> No, that is not the
On 24 Nov 2020, at 13:57, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> Dnia 24.11.2020 o godz. 12:20:23 @lbutlr pisze:
>>> I'm not talking about client getting confused about threading. I'm talking
>>> about the fact that when you get only an off-list message and reply to it,
>>> the reply goes only to the original sen
Dnia 24.11.2020 o godz. 14:37:13 @lbutlr pisze:
> > Only the copy that went through the mailing list has those,
>
> No.
>
> Please re-read what I wrote.
So, I looked through my archives and found an actual message from this
mailing list, that someone sent both to me and to list. Below are the ac
Hi Richard,
Amavisd-new can be extended to support SAVDI. I am using it in one of my
installation. Just google search amavisd + savdi, there are numerous
documentation on how to do so.
Kind regards
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020, 9:07 PM Richard Siddall
wrote:
> michael Schumacher wrote:
> > Joe,
> >
>
On 24 Nov 2020, at 15:08, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> Dnia 24.11.2020 o godz. 14:37:13 @lbutlr pisze:
>>> Only the copy that went through the mailing list has those,
>>
>> No.
>>
>> Please re-read what I wrote.
>
> So, I looked through my archives and found an actual message from this
> mailing list
Dnia 24.11.2020 o godz. 16:25:54 @lbutlr pisze:
>
> Note that the headers you include have NEITHER a reply-to header NOR an
> X-Listname header. Why? Because those are added BY MY MAILSERVER.
[...]
> Not talking about average mail users, Never have been talking about
> average mail users. This s
On 24 Nov 2020, at 17:23, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> That's the reason why I ignore the specifics of your setup and concentrate
> on de-duplication in general.
Interesting rationalization. But sure, have it your way.
--
'A man like that could inspire a handful of broken men to conquer a
cou
On 24/11/20 3:56 am, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jaroslaw Rafa:
Dnia 23.11.2020 o godz. 10:18:39 D'Arcy Cain pisze:
I used to have a client who was not getting emails from one of his
friends. Turned out that the friend's client/MUA was not adding the
message ID.
Doesn't Postfix automatically add M
On 25/11/20 1:53 am, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
However, this thread is off-topic. We should close it with conclusion:
don't avoid duplicate mail based on Message-Id:
A better conclusion would be to not consider messages with a missing or
empty Message-Id to be duplicates of each other. I
Steven,
A bit more information about your postfix server configuration will be greatly
appreciated.
postconf -n
If possible, let us see the log when loop occurs.
regards
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org On
Behalf Of Steven Jones
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 8:49 AM
To: postfix-users@
Hi,
I had missed something simple I guess,
lists..xx.nz local:
in the transport file
Once in mail gets delivered to mailman OK.
regards
Steven
From: Koga Hayashi
Sent: Wednesday, 25 November 2020 3:45 PM
To: Steven Jones ; postfix-users@postfix.org
21 matches
Mail list logo
