Re: delaying postfix until/unless VPN is up/connected

2020-03-24 Thread Wietse Venema
Ranjan Maitra: > However, I am a little confused as to what I should do. It appears > to me that an example such as here: > https://blog.skbali.com/2019/03/start-a-script-on-boot-using-systemd/ > would be enough to get this started at boot? I suggest that you ask about how to run a command at boot

Re: delaying postfix until/unless VPN is up/connected

2020-03-24 Thread Ranjan Maitra
On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 08:49:26 -0400 (EDT) Wietse Venema wrote: > Ranjan Maitra: > > However, I am a little confused as to what I should do. It appears > > to me that an example such as here: > > https://blog.skbali.com/2019/03/start-a-script-on-boot-using-systemd/ > > would be enough to get this

Re: delaying postfix until/unless VPN is up/connected

2020-03-24 Thread Jaroslaw Rafa
Dnia 24.03.2020 o godz. 08:49:26 Wietse Venema pisze: > Ranjan Maitra: > > However, I am a little confused as to what I should do. It appears > > to me that an example such as here: > > https://blog.skbali.com/2019/03/start-a-script-on-boot-using-systemd/ > > would be enough to get this started at

Re: delaying postfix until/unless VPN is up/connected

2020-03-24 Thread Ranjan Maitra
On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:51:38 +0100 Jaroslaw Rafa wrote: > Dnia 24.03.2020 o godz. 08:49:26 Wietse Venema pisze: > > Ranjan Maitra: > > > However, I am a little confused as to what I should do. It appears > > > to me that an example such as here: > > > https://blog.skbali.com/2019/03/start-a-scrip

Re: Gmail and spam, a request

2020-03-24 Thread Richard Salts
On 23/03/2020 8:55 am, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: It is best to not modify the message headers at all, which iseffectively what the Postfix list does (it adds a Sender: header which should not be covered by the upstream DKIM signature). I know the Sender header has traditionally been used by mail

Re: Gmail and spam, a request

2020-03-24 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 01:43:07PM +1100, Richard Salts wrote: > On 23/03/2020 8:55 am, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > It is best to not modify the message headers at all, which iseffectively > > what the Postfix list does (it adds a Sender: header which should not be > > covered by the upstream DKI