On 2014-10-23 16:27, Noel Jones wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/23/2014 8:32 AM, Patrik Båt wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> *main.cf config:* smtp_tls_policy_maps =
>> hash:/etc/postfix/maps/tls_policy transport_maps =
>> proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql/relay-transpor
Hi,
In
"Postfix/milter benchmarking" on Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:45:06 -0700,
Julian Mehnle wrote:
> I'm developing a new milter and I need to benchmark it when plugged into
> Postfix. What are my best options for generating an SMTP stream of messages
> directed at a single Postfix instance at
Dear postfix users,
today we discovered a problem with one of our mailrelays. Maillog
contains lines like the following:
Oct 23 10:53:00 rv-smtpext-201 postfix/pickup[11413]: [ID 947731
mail.warning] warning: maildrop/6B8F696F6: error writing 2737698C0: no
recipients specified
Looking deep
* Noel Jones [2014-10-24 00:36]:
> > I tried to implement this by using a check_recipient_access pcre_table
> > like this:
> >
> > /etc/postfix# cat recipient_access.pcre
> > /^postfix-reject-address@.+$/ REJECT
> >
>
> This must match the recipient address as sent by the client and
> logged
Jan P. Kessler:
> Dear postfix users,
>
> today we discovered a problem with one of our mailrelays. Maillog
> contains lines like the following:
>
> Oct 23 10:53:00 rv-smtpext-201 postfix/pickup[11413]: [ID 947731
> mail.warning] warning: maildrop/6B8F696F6: error writing 2737698C0: no
> recip
Sebastian Wiesinger:
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> check_recipient_access
> proxy:mysql:$config_directory/sql/mysql_check_recipient_access.cf,
> ...
>
> (Also I had to extend proxy_read_maps for this).
Argh. I forgot to include that in the default proxy
Oct 23 10:53:00 rv-smtpext-201 postfix/pickup[11413]: [ID 947731
mail.warning] warning: maildrop/6B8F696F6: error writing 2737698C0: no
recipients specified
The Postfix sendmail command awas invoked with no recipients on the
command line, and (with -t) with no recipients in the message header.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 01:59:57PM +0200, Jan P. Kessler wrote:
> # egrep "6B8F696F6|2737698C0" /var/log/maillog
> Oct 23 10:46:58 rv-smtpext-201 postfix/smtpd[1020]: [ID 197553 mail.info]
> 6B8F696F6: client=mail-la0-f45.google.com[209.85.215.45]
> Oct 23 10:46:58 rv-smtpext-201 postfix/cleanup[2
A maildrop queue file is created when something submits mail with
the Postfix sendmail command, or when a maildrop queue file is
renamed from the incoming/active/deferred queue with the "postsuper
-r" command.
Local submission:
sendmail command command->postdrop command->maildrop queue file->
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:24:13AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> A maildrop queue file is created when something submits mail with
> the Postfix sendmail command, or when a maildrop queue file is
> renamed from the incoming/active/deferred queue with the "postsuper
> -r" command.
>
> Local submiss
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:24:13AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > A maildrop queue file is created when something submits mail with
> > the Postfix sendmail command, or when a maildrop queue file is
> > renamed from the incoming/active/deferred queue with the "postsuper
> > -r"
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:14:59AM +0200, Patrik B?t wrote:
> Another question, if I do the lookup of transport in transport_maps, I
> can't use the domain in tls_policy_map?
As documented, the lookup key for TLS policy is the smtp nexthop.
Sometimes the nexthop is the recipient domain, other tim
Viktor:
TOO MUCH MANUAL QUEUE MANAGEMENT.
Wietse:
So I speculate that what you see was the result of a "postsuper -r"
race condition.
Thanks! That was it. A colleague told me, that the queue on that system
and a subsequent content filter had been congested and users were
waiting impatient
Jan P. Kessler:
> Viktor:
> > TOO MUCH MANUAL QUEUE MANAGEMENT.
>
> Just one more question: Looking at the queue directories, I found:
>
> # find /var/spool/postfix/defer -type f|wc -l
> 13532
Bleh.
> While postqueue sais:
>
> # postqueue -p
> Mail queue is empty
>
> Is this also a conse
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 03:55:55PM +0200, Jan P. Kessler wrote:
>
> # find /var/spool/postfix/defer -type f|wc -l
> 13532
These are not mail messages (those would be in "deferred" not
"defer"). These are "defer logs", used to construct the per-recipient
error reasons in bounce messages.
Th
Hi.
Hello!
Is there a way to limit connections from web applications on the same
server for postfix?
The web application sends messages via smtp on localhost (127.0.0.1:25).
Need to limit the maximum 5k messages per hour. Is that possible?
Regards
--
-
_En
Am 24.10.2014 um 20:47 schrieb Julio Cesar Covolato:
Is there a way to limit connections from web applications on the same
server for postfix?
The web application sends messages via smtp on localhost (127.0.0.1:25).
Need to limit the maximum 5k messages per hour. Is that possible?
not a postf
Julio Cesar Covolato:
> Hi.
>
> Hello!
> Is there a way to limit connections from web applications on the same
> server for postfix?
> The web application sends messages via smtp on localhost (127.0.0.1:25).
>
> Need to limit the maximum 5k messages per hour. Is that possible?
You don't want to
* on the Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 03:41:22PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Is there a way to limit connections from web applications on the same
>> server for postfix?
>> The web application sends messages via smtp on localhost (127.0.0.1:25).
>>
>> Need to limit the maximum 5k messages per hour. I
On 10/24/2014 2:47 PM, Julio Cesar Covolato wrote:
Hi.
Hello!
Is there a way to limit connections from web applications on the same
server for postfix?
The web application sends messages via smtp on localhost (127.0.0.1:25).
Need to limit the maximum 5k messages per hour. Is that possible?
R
Am 24.10.2014 um 22:22 schrieb Mike Cardwell:
* on the Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 03:41:22PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Is there a way to limit connections from web applications on the same
server for postfix?
The web application sends messages via smtp on localhost (127.0.0.1:25).
Need to limit t
Am 24.10.2014 um 22:41 schrieb Rod K:
On 10/24/2014 2:47 PM, Julio Cesar Covolato wrote:
Hi.
Hello!
Is there a way to limit connections from web applications on the same
server for postfix?
The web application sends messages via smtp on localhost (127.0.0.1:25).
Need to limit the maximum 5k
Mike Cardwell:
Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> * on the Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 03:41:22PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> >> Is there a way to limit connections from web applications on the same
> >> server for postfix?
> >> The web application sends m
* on the Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:42:27PM +0200, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Is there a way to limit connections from web applications on the same
server for postfix?
The web application sends messages via smtp on localhost (127.0.0.1:25).
>>> Need to limit the maximum 5k messages p
Am 24.10.2014 um 22:56 schrieb Mike Cardwell:
* on the Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:42:27PM +0200, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Is there a way to limit connections from web applications on the same
server for postfix?
The web application sends messages via smtp on localhost (127.0.0.1:25).
Need to limi
Mike Cardwell:
> If a user attempts to send more email than they are allowed to and the mail
> server starts rejecting it and the users code doesn't handle this case, then
> from the shared hosting companies point of view, it is a problem at the
> users end.
In that case, Postfix can require that
On 10/24/2014 4:47 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 24.10.2014 um 22:41 schrieb Rod K:
On 10/24/2014 2:47 PM, Julio Cesar Covolato wrote:
Hi.
Hello!
Is there a way to limit connections from web applications on the same
server for postfix?
The web application sends messages via smtp on localhos
* on the Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:04:18PM +0200, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>>> the problem is that a website script can't handle a temporary reject
>>
>> That's not true.
>
> it is true - period
>
> nobody right in his brain implements a mail queue in a scripting
> language like PHP where the scri
* on the Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 05:09:21PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> If a user attempts to send more email than they are allowed to and the mail
>> server starts rejecting it and the users code doesn't handle this case, then
>> from the shared hosting companies point of view, it is a problem at
Am 25.10.2014 um 00:28 schrieb Mike Cardwell:
* on the Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:04:18PM +0200, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
and so you end in lose random mails if for whatever reason the app exceeds
the limits
Web-apps that weren't written to handle retries, don't handle retries. I'll
agree with th
* on the Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 04:51:42PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> I did this for a shared hosting system about ten years ago using the
>> ident functionality in Exim. I installed a local ident daemon and
>> then configured Exim to talk to it. Once Exim knew the user, it could
>> apply user-l
I've known for many years that Messagelabs, now part of Symantec,
requests a valid client certificate from a narrow list of CAs if you
want to use starttls with their servers, at least *.eu.messaglelabs.com.
This effectively kills off the use of any self-signed, expired and
invalid certificates. T
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 01:13:38AM +0200, Per Thorsheim wrote:
> I've known for many years that Messagelabs, now part of Symantec,
> requests a valid client certificate from a narrow list of CAs if you
> want to use starttls with their servers, at least *.eu.messaglelabs.com.
Can you explain what
Am 24.10.2014 um 20:47 schrieb Julio Cesar Covolato:
> Hi.
>
> Hello!
> Is there a way to limit connections from web applications on the same
> server for postfix?
> The web application sends messages via smtp on localhost (127.0.0.1:25).
>
> Need to limit the maximum 5k messages per hour. Is tha
34 matches
Mail list logo
